Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00513549 · files monthly
“Our mission is to provide energy and improve lives.
We are excited about the future of energy and helping the world move forward.”
Phillips 66, the organization this committee is the political fund of, phillips66.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 101 | $663,000 | $0 | $663,000 | 76% |
| Democratic | 21 | $161,000 | $0 | $161,000 | 18% |
| Other or unresolved | 14 | $53,000 | $0 | $53,000 | 6% |
| Shown support | 136 | $877,000 | $0 | $877,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 22 | $166K · 15% |
| Republican candidates | 102 | $660.5K · 58% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 16 | $63K · 5.6% |
| Other PACs and committees | 35 | $245K · 22% |
| All recipients | 175 | $1.1M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 32 | $203.5K |
| California | 8 | $60K |
| Louisiana | 6 | $50K |
| Oklahoma | 7 | $47.5K |
| North Carolina | 5 | $35K |
| Ohio | 5 | $32.5K |
| Colorado | 3 | $30K |
| Montana | 4 | $27.5K |
The largest 8 of 41 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 6,306 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $895.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $1,243,754
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,377 contributions · 66% | $587,917 |
| 698 contributions · 10% | $89,724 |
| 428 contributions · 5% | $45,139 |
| 298 contributions · 3.8% | $34,365 |
| 417 contributions · 3.6% | $32,114 |
| 375 contributions · 3% |
Total reported disbursements $1,454,776
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $1,137,336
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $230.5K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Phillips 66 pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $130.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “PHILLIPS 66”, found by searching “PHILLIPS 66”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Phillips 66 PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Phillips 66 as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Phillips 66 PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to MULLIN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
$5K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CAPITO · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SCALISE LEADERSHIP FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BARRASSO · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to HISPANIC LEADERSHIP TRUST PARTNERSHIP · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND DEMOCRACY NOW PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to FAMILIES FOR JAMES LANKFORD · 2 payments | $10K |
$1.1M across 179 recipient committees, or 78% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $27,183 |
| 263 contributions · 2.2% | $19,335 |
| 145 contributions · 1.3% | $11,669 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6,289 contributions · 94% of ranked | $839,205 |
| 3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $5,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($270,309) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 320 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $53,161 |
| 123 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $28,231 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 9 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $28,000 |
| 236 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $27,981 |
| 25 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $25,664 |
| 6 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 40 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $24,700 |
| 317 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $24,520 |
A further $5,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($270,309) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
All 423 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 4 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.