Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › OK-03 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, OK-03
Representative since 1993
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
7 priorities from frankdlucas.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The United States Constitution is the bedrock document that protects our freedoms and guarantees us our liberties. Frank has sworn an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution and that includes fighting for our shared conservative values. The Second Amendment reads, “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, which is why Frank believes protecting the ability of law-abiding citizens to bear arms is a fundamental right. Another document that guides our American values is the Declaration of Independence. It states that individuals are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”. Frank believes every life is worth protecting- including the life of an unborn child. From supporting legislation protecting unborn children to safeguarding our Second Amendment rights, Frank will always stand up for our conservative values.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · frankdlucas.com/issues
Heading as listed on frankdlucas.com/issues ↗ (opens frankdlucas.com/issues at this heading)
Our District’s rural communities are the backbone of Oklahoma’s economy. The more than 28,000 family farms that call the Third District home sold nearly $4.2 billion worth of products into the global marketplace. As a fifth-generation Oklahoman living on the family farm as a cattle rancher and wheat farmer, Frank knows just how important it is to support the communities that clothe and feed billions around the world. Often times Washington forgets about rural America. Frank stands up for rural Oklahoma- providing for Oklahoma’s farmers, pushing for an increase in rural broadband, fighting to save rural hospitals, and encourages more fair and free trade between our trading partners. Agriculture is a way of life in Western Oklahoma and Frank is a strong voice for all of the District’s rural communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · frankdlucas.com/issues
Heading as listed on frankdlucas.com/issues ↗ (opens frankdlucas.com/issues at this heading)
Our veterans represent the very best of our great nation. While nothing can measure up to the sacrifices made by these brave men and women, America must keep its promise to support and provide for those who served. From health care to education, our veterans, and the families they call home, deserve easy access to the benefits they earned. Oklahoma is home to more than 303,000 veterans, and Frank will make sure Washington never leaves a soldier or veteran behind.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · frankdlucas.com/issues
Heading as listed on frankdlucas.com/issues ↗ (opens frankdlucas.com/issues at this heading)
America’s immigration system is broken. While our nation prides itself as being a nation of immigrants, we are also a nation of laws. Frank supports President Trump and believes we must do more to secure the Southern border and provide more resources to our law enforcement and border patrol officials to keep our communities safe. Immigration reform also means modernizing America’s outdated immigration policies- prioritizing high-skilled entrepreneurs and streamlining agricultural worker programs- helping create a legal workforce that will bolster the American economy
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · frankdlucas.com/issues
Heading as listed on frankdlucas.com/issues ↗ (opens frankdlucas.com/issues at this heading)
Oklahoma’s economy is strongest when taxes are low, businesses are able to thrive, and government gets out of the way. From voting for historic tax reform to cutting unnecessary regulatory red tape, Frank supports lowering taxes, reducing burdensome regulations, and increasing free and fair trade- guaranteeing more Oklahomans take home more money at the end of a long-day’s work. He knows what small business owners and family farmers really want is for the government to get out of the way and let them grow their business. Allowing our small businesses and family farms thrive not only creates jobs but it promises a brighter future for all of Oklahoma’s families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · frankdlucas.com/issues
Heading as listed on frankdlucas.com/issues ↗ (opens frankdlucas.com/issues at this heading)
There is no greater role the federal government has than that of providing for our national defense. After nearly a decade of cuts by the previous administration, Congress must restore the strength of America’s military and provide our troops the tools they need to successfully complete their mission. We live in an increasingly dangerous world where our nation faces enemies that threaten our safety and security; which is why Frank supports a strong and fully capable U.S. military. Oklahoma’s Third District plays a critical role supporting America’s military. From Altus Air Force Base to Vance Air Force Base, Frank will always fight to make sure our District leads the nation in supporting the global superiority of our Air Force.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · frankdlucas.com/issues
Heading as listed on frankdlucas.com/issues ↗ (opens frankdlucas.com/issues at this heading)
Washington has a spending problem. Our national debt is now more than $22 trillion and it’s growing each and every day. Families and small businesses across Oklahoma must live within their means, Frank believes Washington should do the same. Reducing the size of government in Washington and cutting wasteful governmental spending, we can lift the fear of leaving behind a crushing debt to our children and grandchildren.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · frankdlucas.com/issues
Heading as listed on frankdlucas.com/issues ↗ (opens frankdlucas.com/issues at this heading)
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 14 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Agriculture
House Committee on Financial Services
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Lucas’ 45 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00287912
$1.05 has been spent for every dollar raised across 9 reports ($1.1M of $1.1M). Cash on hand went from $569.7K on Mar 31, 2025 to $570.5K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $48,188 | $96,765 | $569,708 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $216,298 | $51,373 | $734,633 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $103,098 | $52,136 | $785,595 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $104,712 | $76,829 | $813,477 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $86,925 | $59,333 | $841,069 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 27, 2026 | $170,931 | $539,120 | $472,880 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $177,128 | $117,496 | $532,512 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $132,641 | $89,800 | $575,353 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $15,165 | $20,044 | $570,474 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Endorsements we could not read
Advanced · 55,616 votes (71%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 363 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $794.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 119 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $167.5K.
Total reported receipts $1,055,085
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
58% of the money placed by state came from inside Oklahoma: $97.8K of $167.5K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 64 contributions · 58% | $97,754 |
| 16 contributions · 9.3% | $15,500 |
| 4 contributions · 8.4% | $14,000 |
| 12 contributions · 6.4% | $10,750 |
| 2 contributions · 4.2% | $7,000 |
| 6 contributions · 3.4% | $5,750 |
| 2 contributions · 2.7% | $4,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.7% | $4,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 14 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 24 contributions · 24% of ranked | $36,500 |
| 6 contributions · 12% of ranked | $18,300 |
| 10 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $3,500 |
A further $12,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,358) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $30 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $887,912
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 319 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
4 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $12,988 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 41% of all spending | $455,995 |
| 19 payments · 9% of all spending | $99,651 |
| 18 payments · 5.6% of all spending | $61,865 |
| 4 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $29,178 |
| 2 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $29,000 |
| 10 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $17,077 |
| 6 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $12,025 |
| 1 payment · 0.8% of all spending | $9,116 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 contributions · 11% of ranked | $18,300 |
| 11 contributions · 10% of ranked | $17,000 |
| 6 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $13,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 6 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $12,250 |
| 5 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 11 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $9,500 |
| 9 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $7,304 |
| 2 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,358) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.