Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Trade associationCordova, TennesseeActive
Connected organization: National Cotton Council of America
Political fund of National Cotton Council of America
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00023028 · files quarterly
“The National Cotton Council is a federation that works out common problems and develops programs of mutual benefit for its members.”
National Cotton Council of America, the organization this committee is the political fund of, cotton.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 133 | $642,000 | $0 | $642,000 | 63% |
| Democratic | 65 | $310,000 | $0 | $310,000 | 30% |
| Other or unresolved | 19 | $65,500 | $0 | $65,500 | 6.4% |
| Shown support | 217 | $1,017,500 | $0 | $1,017,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 65 | $310K · 21% |
| Republican candidates | 131 | $627K · 43% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 22 | $83K · 5.7% |
| Republican party committees | 2 | $120K · 8.2% |
| Other party committees | 3 | $90K · 6.2% |
| Other PACs and committees | 39 | $229K · 16% |
| All recipients | 262 | $1.5M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 29 | $112.5K |
| California | 15 | $87K |
| North Carolina | 14 | $68.5K |
| Georgia | 9 | $61.5K |
| New York | 12 | $54.5K |
| Florida | 12 | $49K |
| Oklahoma | 5 | $40K |
| Ohio |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,299 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $759.6K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
The 2 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $15.3K from 2 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $1,161,461
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 366 contributions · 32% | $246,045 |
| 126 contributions · 10% | $79,726 |
| 141 contributions · 9.7% | $73,387 |
| 106 contributions · 8.1% | $61,721 |
| 65 contributions · 6.9% | $52,530 |
| 102 contributions · 6.7% | $50,520 |
Total reported disbursements $1,470,099
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $373.1K, Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late 12G report, 2000$325 assessed
Case 327 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
National Cotton Council of America Committee for the Advancement of Cotton is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names National Cotton Council of America as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Cotton Council of America Committee for the Advancement of Cotton is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| 9 |
| $35K |
The largest 8 of 44 states.
Bars drawn to $60K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SOUTHERN COTTON GROWERS, INC. · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to MULLIN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $500 |
$21.5K from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $60K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 2 payments | $60K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $15K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SMITH VICTORY · 2 payments | $10K |
$1.5M across 273 recipient committees, or 99% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 61 contributions · 6.1% | $46,579 |
| 46 contributions · 3.6% | $27,263 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 904 contributions · 70% of ranked | $530,217 |
| 6 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $17,230 |
| 14 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $9,320 |
| 3 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $8,466 |
| 7 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $7,028 |
| 8 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $6,696 |
| 33 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $6,661 |
| 14 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $6,499 |
A further $587 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($118,924) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 837 contributions · 66% of ranked | $501,434 |
| 56 contributions · 4% of ranked | $30,501 |
| 63 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $28,176 |
| 33 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $20,993 |
| 17 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $18,110 |
| 36 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $14,791 |
| 5 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $11,362 |
| 15 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $10,187 |
A further $587 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($118,924) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,445,247
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 567 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 2 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 89 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $16,747 |
| 3 payments · 1% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ELECT DIVERSE DEMOCRATS PAC · 2 payments | $10K |