Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: The Farm Credit Council
Political fund of The Farm Credit Council
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00193631 · files monthly
“The Farm Credit Council is the national trade association representing the institutions of the Farm Credit System before Congress, the Executive Branch and others. Learn more about the Farm Credit Council.”
The Farm Credit Council, the organization this committee is the political fund of, farmcredit.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
6 priorities from the site of The Farm Credit Council, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Farm Credit helps U.S. agricultural producers feed the world, rural businesses grow and rural families thrive.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com
Heading as listed on farmcredit.com ↗ (opens farmcredit.com at this heading)
Join Farm Credit to encourage Congress to pass the outstanding Farm Bill provisions important to farmers, ranchers and rural communities.
Your voice helps ensure a strong farm economy and supports the future of agriculture and rural communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues/farm-bill
Farm Credit supports rural communities and agriculture with reliable, consistent credit and financial services, today and tomorrow.
For more than 100 years, Farm Credit has fulfilled its mission – through good times and bad.
To fulfill our mission, Farm Credit raises funds in the world’s capital markets and invests them in rural America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/about-us/mission
We serve every part of agriculture from the smallest operations to the largest – and everything in between.
Whether helping a young farm family begin, supporting our veterans as they return home and take up farming or financing U.S. agricultural exports around the globe, Farm Credit is committed to the success of American agriculture.
Our loans and related financial services support farmers and ranchers, farmer-owned cooperatives and other agribusinesses, rural homebuyers and companies exporting U.S. ag products around the world.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/about-us/mission
Our nationwide network of customer-owned financial institutions offers a wide range of financial products specifically tailored to the individual needs of agricultural producers, farmer-owned cooperatives and other agribusinesses, commercial fishers, rural homebuyers and rural infrastructure providers.
Farm Credit’s financial strength means that our customer-owners have access to the most modern loan products available, from the smallest loan to a farmer starting out to a large multi-lender loan syndication needed to bring broadband to an entire rural community.
For agricultural producers, we make loans to buy land, operate farms, purchase equipment, build facilities and much more.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/about-us/mission
Farm Credit supports the ingenuity and dedication of our customers as they explore ways to operate sustainably.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues/financing-climate-smart-agriculture
Farm Credit’s legislative priorities reflect its strong and steadfast support for rural communities and agriculture.
Whether it is time to pass a new Farm Bill, advocate for the federal crop insurance program or promote policies to strengthen rural America, these issues originate from our customer-owners thanks to our cooperative structure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues
Short Heading ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
Farm Credit supports a strong Farm Bill that will provide certainty to agricultural producers across the country.
This includes a robust crop insurance program, investment in rural communities and more.
Learn about the Farm Bill
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues
Heading as listed on farmcredit.com/issues ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
Short Heading ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
From natural disasters to severe market disruptions, Farm Credit supports a strong crop insurance program that provides the critical safety net for the farm families who feed the world.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues
From natural disasters to severe market disruptions, Farm Credit supports a strong crop insurance program that provides the critical safety net for the farm families who feed the world.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues/crop-insurance
Heading as listed on farmcredit.com/issues ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
Short Heading ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
From planting cover crops and crop rotation to conservation tillage and other regenerative practices, environmentally sustainable practices benefit producers, the land they operate, their local communities and make agriculture more resilient to climate risks.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues
Heading as listed on farmcredit.com/issues ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
Short Heading ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
Farm Credit supports increased investment in rural infrastructure to improve quality of life in the countryside and increase the competitiveness of rural America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues
Farm Credit supports increasing investment for rural infrastructure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues/rural-infrastructure
Heading as listed on farmcredit.com/issues ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
Heading as listed on farmcredit.com/issues ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
Supporting rural infrastructure providers is a critical component of how Farm Credit supports rural communities and agriculture.
American agriculture not only feeds the world, it also creates millions of jobs for U.S. workers.
Our nation’s ability to produce and efficiently transport food and fiber globally is crucial to our nation’s competitiveness internationally.
Deteriorating infrastructure threatens our competitiveness.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · farmcredit.com/issues/rural-infrastructure
Heading as listed on farmcredit.com/issues/rural-infrastructure ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues/rural-infrastructure at this heading) · “Rural Infrastructure” on farmcredit.com/issues ↗ (opens farmcredit.com/issues at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 127 | $754,000 | $0 | $754,000 | 64% |
| Democratic | 60 | $339,000 | $0 | $339,000 | 29% |
| Other or unresolved | 22 | $85,000 | $0 | $85,000 | 7.2% |
| Shown support | 209 | $1,178,000 | $0 | $1,178,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 60 | $339K · 23% |
| Republican candidates | 126 | $753K · 51% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 23 | $86K · 5.9% |
| Other PACs and committees | 46 | $286.5K · 20% |
| All recipients | 255 | $1.5M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 21 | $109.5K |
| Michigan | 11 | $80K |
| California | 13 | $73K |
| Minnesota | 8 | $60K |
| Ohio | 9 | $58K |
| Illinois | 8 | $55K |
| Alabama | 6 | $38K |
| Kentucky | 5 | $37.5K |
The largest 8 of 46 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,986 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.4M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,637,481
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 181 contributions · 15% | $217,807 |
| 138 contributions · 6.8% | $97,340 |
| 176 contributions · 6.7% |
Total reported disbursements $1,509,258
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $256.9K, March 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late M6 report, 2017$1.9K assessed
Case 3334 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
Besides giving through its PAC, Farm Credit Council pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $401K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “FARM CREDIT COUNCIL”, found by searching “FARM CREDIT COUNCIL”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
The Farm Credit Council PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names The Farm Credit Council as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
The Farm Credit Council PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $12.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to AMY KLOBUCHAR VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
$5K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to SELL · 3 payments | $12.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to LETLOW VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $12.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY · 5 payments | $10.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to FINSTAD VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to VICENTE GONZALEZ VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to AUSTIN SCOTT VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BOOZMAN · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to HISPANIC LEADERSHIP TRUST PARTNERSHIP · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
$1.5M across 259 recipient committees, or 97% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $95,727 |
| 84 contributions · 6.1% | $87,325 |
| 110 contributions · 5.3% | $75,019 |
| 107 contributions · 4.6% | $65,550 |
| 65 contributions · 4.1% | $58,215 |
| 65 contributions · 3.4% | $48,009 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 206 contributions · 10% of ranked | $145,671 |
| 236 contributions · 9% of ranked | $128,767 |
| 82 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $75,260 |
| 46 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $73,399 |
| 103 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $64,705 |
| 69 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $64,176 |
| 61 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $60,297 |
| 45 contributions · 4% of ranked | $56,700 |
A further $2,383 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($145,418) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 481 contributions · 29% of ranked | $375,774 |
| 287 contributions · 17% of ranked | $225,233 |
| 49 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $63,050 |
| 24 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $40,200 |
| 28 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $23,525 |
| 21 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $20,050 |
| 23 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $19,800 |
| 18 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $18,700 |
A further $4,333 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($145,418) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,479,275
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 608 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $19,467 |
| 3 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $12,500 |
| 4 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $12,500 |
| 5 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,500 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.