Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › UT-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, UT-04
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
7 priorities from mikekennedyforutah.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Mike Kennedy ran for Congress to do the job the right way: follow the Constitution, rein in federal overreach, and stand up for Utah families dealing with higher costs.
Before Congress, Mike served in Utah’s part-time legislature, where he helped deliver tax relief, balance budgets, and defend individual freedoms. That experience carries into how he serves today, focused on doing the work and delivering where it matters.
Congressman Kennedy has: ↗ (opens mikekennedyforutah.com/issues at this heading)
- Passed legislation to strengthen wildfire prevention and protect Utah communities
- Worked to improve rail safety and protect supply chains that Utah jobs rely on
- Led efforts to expand energy production and improve permitting so projects can move forward and create jobs
- Introduced legislation to expand technical education and strengthen workforce pathways
- Worked to improve healthcare access, especially in rural communities
- Taken action to protect American research and jobs from foreign adversaries
- Consistently opposed wasteful spending and federal overreach
Mike will continue working to lower costs, expand opportunity, and restore a federal government that operates within its proper role.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikekennedyforutah.com/issues
Families across Utah are still feeling the impact of higher prices. Before Mike took office, inflation peaked at over 9%. Families are still dealing with the effects of that increase today.
Mike is focused on relief that shows up in paychecks and family budgets.
Congressman Kennedy has: ↗ (opens mikekennedyforutah.com/issues at this heading)
- Supported and helped advance eliminating taxes on tips and overtime so working Utahns keep more of what they earn
- Supported strengthening the Child Tax Credit and protecting it from inflation
- Backed a deduction for car loan interest to support working families
- Worked to expand access to Health Savings Accounts and Flexible Spending Accounts
- Sponsored the Let’s Get to Work Act to strengthen workforce participation
Mike has pushed back on spending policies that drive inflation and increase costs because decisions made in Washington affect families here in Utah. He will continue working to lower costs and make life more affordable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikekennedyforutah.com/issues
Washington has a spending problem, and Mike has been clear about that from day one.
Congressman Kennedy has: ↗ (opens mikekennedyforutah.com/issues at this heading)
- Voted against bloated spending bills
- Opposed policies that expand government without accountability
- Worked to reduce fraud and abuse in federal programs
- Pushed for stronger oversight of taxpayer dollars
- Continued to support term limits for members of Congress and unelected federal bureaucrats
Mike will continue working to restore discipline, protect taxpayers, and bring government back within its proper limits, with a focus on serving the American people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikekennedyforutah.com/issues
Energy policy directly impacts jobs, cost of living, and national security. Mike supports an all-of-the-above approach that puts American energy first and protects Utah’s ability to produce.
Congressman Kennedy has: ↗ (opens mikekennedyforutah.com/issues at this heading)
- Worked to expand domestic energy production to support Utah jobs and lower costs
- Pushed back on federal land decisions that limit access to Utah resources
- Supported efforts to cut red tape that delays projects and prevents job creation
Mike will continue working on energy affordability, reliability, and production here at home while strengthening American energy independence and dominance.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikekennedyforutah.com/issues
Mike supports securing the border, enforcing the law, and protecting our communities.
Congressman Kennedy has: ↗ (opens mikekennedyforutah.com/issues at this heading)
- Supported the Laken Riley Act to strengthen enforcement and protect communities from violent offenders
- Focused on stopping the flow of fentanyl into Utah communities
- Supported efforts to strengthen border security and restore enforcement
- Worked to go after drug cartels and human trafficking networks
At the same time, Mike believes the system needs to work. His father came to this country legally, and he understands the value of legal immigration and doing things the right way.
Utah has always been a place that welcomes people who come here legally, work hard, and contribute to our country. Mike supports fixing our legal immigration system so it is clear, consistent, and fair, while protecting our communities and keeping our nation secure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikekennedyforutah.com/issues
As a physician, Mike understands the system from the inside. He has worked to improve access to care, especially in rural communities where options are limited.
Congressman Kennedy has: ↗ (opens mikekennedyforutah.com/issues at this heading)
- Supported policies that make it easier to open and sustain rural hospitals
- Worked to expand telehealth so patients can get care closer to home
- Supported strengthening Health Savings Accounts to give patients more control
Mike will continue working to improve access to care while ensuring healthcare decisions are made by patients and doctors, not Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikekennedyforutah.com/issues
Mike believes the Constitution sets clear limits on federal power, and believes those limits matter.
Congressman Kennedy has: ↗ (opens mikekennedyforutah.com/issues at this heading)
- Defended the right to life, the Second Amendment, and religious liberty
- Pushed back on federal overreach and efforts to take power away from states and families
- Supported policies that give parents more transparency and a stronger voice in decisions affecting their children
As a Utah state senator, Mike sponsored and passed legislation to protect minors from dangerous and irreversible transgender surgeries. He took that stand despite intense backlash and did not back down, even when he received threats and his home was vandalized.
In Congress, he has continued that work by sponsoring the Chloe Cole Act to further protect children with serious, actionable policy.
Mike will continue defending the Constitution, protecting individual freedom, and standing with families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikekennedyforutah.com/issues
93% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 43 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Natural Resources
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Kennedy’s 35 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00864488
73¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 8 reports ($885.8K of $1.2M). Cash on hand went from $116.3K on Mar 31, 2025 to $448.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $67,687 | $76,565 | $116,324 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $216,416 | $96,247 | $236,493 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $163,196 | $158,720 | $240,969 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $162,860 | $111,687 | $292,142 |
| PRE-CONVENTION 2026 through Apr 5, 2026 | $192,060 | $113,355 | $370,847 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $169,174 | $153,464 | $386,557 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $226,546 | $147,835 | $465,268 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $11,439 | $27,889 | $448,818 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Lighthouse Research, Sep 17, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 350 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $612.3K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 270 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $431.6K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 12 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $46.5K.
Total reported receipts $1,209,378
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
77% of the money placed by state came from inside Utah: $333.9K of $431.6K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 176 contributions · 77% | $333,936 |
| 39 contributions · 6.1% | $26,228 |
| 9 contributions · 3.2% | $13,902 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% | $12,000 |
| 8 contributions · 2.1% | $9,060 |
| 10 contributions · 1.7% | $7,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% | $6,650 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% | $5,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 20 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 27 contributions · 13% of ranked | $54,365 |
| Written instead of an employer · 30 contributions · 12% of ranked | $50,510 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.9% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $9,900 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $6,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,840) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
No outside spending filed
The campaign also refunded $15,209 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $704,445
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 373 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
8 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $18,822 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 13 payments · 33% of all spending | $295,434 |
| 20 payments · 9% of all spending | $79,947 |
| 8 payments · 5% of all spending | $44,265 |
| 21 payments · 4% of all spending | $35,585 |
| 2 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $23,000 |
| 4 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $22,218 |
| 11 payments · 2% of all spending | $17,573 |
| 15 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $16,001 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 29 contributions · 13% of ranked | $56,406 |
| 21 contributions · 11% of ranked | $45,642 |
| 26 contributions · 8.6% of ranked | $36,460 |
| 5 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $28,041 |
| 21 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $26,694 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 7 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
A further $6,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,840) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.