Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00749481 · files monthly
“God-fearing patriots from every walk of life and every corner of America are answering the call to run for office and take back our country.
Congressman August Pfluger’s Raptor PAC is fighting to provide these outstanding conservative candidates with the air support they need to win in November and help us take back Congress.”
Raptor PAC, on its own site, raptorpac.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
God-fearing patriots from every walk of life and every corner of America are answering the call to run for office and take back our country.
Congressman August Pfluger’s Raptor PAC is fighting to provide these outstanding conservative candidates with the air support they need to win in November and help us take back Congress.
We’re committed to bringing the fight to places the GOP never should have lost – and breaking ground in parts of the country that are turning red for the first time.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · raptorpac.org
Heading as listed on raptorpac.org ↗ (opens raptorpac.org at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 230 | $964.2K · 92% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 11 | $34K · 3.3% |
| Other PACs and committees | 16 | $46K · 4.4% |
| All recipients | 257 | $1M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 30 | $124.7K |
| Florida | 21 | $74K |
| Ohio | 12 | $54K |
| California | 12 | $46.5K |
| Tennessee | 10 | $45K |
| Georgia | 10 | $39K |
| Iowa | 5 | $38K |
| South Carolina | 6 | $34.5K |
The largest 8 of 45 states.
The 10 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $95K, more than the $39.5K this committee's own reports show on the line.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 5 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 5 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $20K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,184,619
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 contributions · 50% | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 25% | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 25% | $5,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 100% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $15,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total reported disbursements $1,259,195
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $258.5K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Raptor Technologies, LLC pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $24.8K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “RAPTOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC”, found by searching “RAPTOR”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Raptor PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a leadership PAC. Its FEC record names Pfluger Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Raptor PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $15K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 7 payments | $922.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 5 payments | $91.4K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC. · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL OF AMERICA · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to KOCH, INC. · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ALTRIA GROUP, INC. · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PHILLIPS 66 · 2 payments | $7.5K |
$1.2M from 31 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to JERRY CARL VICTORY COMMITTEE · 4 payments | $15K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ASHLEY HINSON VICTORY COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to KEAN VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM CELESTE · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MILLER-MEEKS VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GROW THE MAJORITY · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to FRESHMAN AGRICULTURAL REPUBLICAN MEMBERS TRUST AKA FARM TRUST · 2 payments |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 100% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $15,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total itemized disbursements $1,231,984
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 674 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 29 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $34,426 |
| 2 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $22,593 |
| 5 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $20,276 |
| 4 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 12 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $11,382 |
| 3 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM VAN EPPS · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CAREY VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEXT GENERATION VICTORY · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CLAY FULLER VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JACE VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
$1M across 275 recipient committees, or 83% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.