Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › IA-01 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, IA-01
Representative since 2021
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
6 priorities from millermeeks.house.gov, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
As a doctor, a veteran, and the proud representative of Iowa's First Congressional District, I've spent three terms in Congress fighting to deliver conservative, common-sense solutions that put people over politics. Whether it's cutting taxes, securing the border, strengthening our military, or lowering health care costs, I've worked every single day to honor the trust Iowans placed in me. That's exactly what my five-pillar Playbook for America delivers: putting Iowa first, lowering costs for working families, expanding access to affordable health care, backing law enforcement while rooting out fraud, and restoring trust in government.
Here's what I believe: Iowa doesn't need Washington to tell it how to live. Iowa needs Washington to get out of the way, cut the waste, lower the costs, and let hardworking families keep more of what they earn. Iowans feed and fuel this country. They raise their families on faith and hard work. They don't ask for handouts. They ask for a fair shot and a government that respects their sacrifice. But this isn't a victory lap. For every promise kept, there's more work to be done. That's why each pillar lays out not only what we've delivered for Iowa, but the fights still ahead, because the day we stop fighting is the day Washington stops working for the people. Iowa first, and the best is yet to come.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · millermeeks.house.gov/Playbook4America
Everything I do in Washington starts with a single question: is it good for Iowa? Our state is the backbone of this country, and Iowans deserve a representative who fights for them first, last, and always. From securing our border to backing our farmers to taking on the cancer epidemic striking too many Iowa families, this pillar is about putting the people of Iowa ahead of the politics of Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · millermeeks.house.gov/Playbook4America
For four years, Iowa families watched the cost of everything climb while their paychecks struggled to keep up. Groceries, gas, housing, and utilities all became harder to afford. I came to Washington to reverse that, and we've delivered real, tangible relief that Iowa families can feel in their budgets. This pillar is about one thing: making life more affordable for the people who work hard and play by the rules.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · millermeeks.house.gov/Playbook4America
I spent decades as a physician before I ever ran for office, caring for patients, running a practice, and seeing firsthand how a broken health care system fails the people who need it most. Rural Iowans shouldn't have to drive hours for care, seniors shouldn't be buried in costs, and no patient should be blindsided by a bill they never saw coming. And taxpayer-funded health care should go to the Americans it was built for, not to those who broke our laws to get here. This pillar brings a doctor's perspective to Washington and puts patients first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · millermeeks.house.gov/Playbook4America
Safe communities are the foundation of everything else. Iowa families deserve to feel secure in their homes and neighborhoods, and the brave men and women who wear the badge deserve our unwavering support, not the demonization pushed by the radical left. At the same time, every tax dollar lost to fraud is a dollar stolen from the hardworking Iowans who earned it. This pillar backs the blue and holds fraudsters accountable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · millermeeks.house.gov/Playbook4America
The American people have lost faith in Washington, and frankly, they have every reason to. Too many politicians treat public office as a path to personal profit while the people they serve get left behind. I believe elected officials should answer to their constituents, not their stock portfolios. This pillar is about restoring the integrity, accountability, and trust that self-government depends on.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · millermeeks.house.gov/Playbook4America
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 22 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Energy and Commerce
House Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Miller-Meeks’ 132 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00558825
85¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($7.8M of $9.1M). Cash on hand went from $1.1M on Mar 31, 2025 to $1.7M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $1,018,369 | $286,449 | $1,105,664 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,310,324 | $299,580 | $2,116,408 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $828,139 | $305,100 | $2,639,448 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $1,098,179 | $386,587 | $3,351,039 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,493,756 | $527,610 | $4,317,186 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $431,646 | $493,468 | $4,255,364 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,027,858 | $591,742 | $4,691,481 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,716,298 | $3,800,069 | $2,607,710 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $177,328 | $1,084,321 | $1,700,717 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Advanced · 35,165 votes (71%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 1,173 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.6M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 9,197 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 7 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 67 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $1.7M.
Total reported receipts $9,101,898
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
35% of the money placed by state came from inside Iowa: $723.5K of $2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,232 contributions · 35% | $723,461 |
| 1,137 contributions · 8.8% | $179,658 |
| 922 contributions · 8.3% | $170,330 |
| 984 contributions · 6.6% | $134,528 |
| 179 contributions · 5.4% | $111,522 |
| 352 contributions · 4.4% | $90,061 |
| 585 contributions · 4.1% | $83,214 |
| 224 contributions · 2.4% | $49,998 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 50 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 7,625 contributions · 46% of ranked | $829,490 |
| Written instead of an employer · 321 contributions · 8% of ranked | $144,186 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $22,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $16,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $13,500 |
| 2 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $10,500 |
A further $59,987 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,333,694) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $190,696 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $3,837,844
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 970 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
123 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $238,564 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 payments · 16% of all spending | $1,210,022 |
| 25 payments · 7.6% of all spending | $591,160 |
| 17 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $374,061 |
| 28 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $287,091 |
| 105 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $126,091 |
| 13 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $120,688 |
| 4 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $117,674 |
| 19 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $93,677 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 7,617 contributions · 42% of ranked | $831,236 |
| 120 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $102,279 |
| 40 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $81,400 |
| 29 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $54,900 |
| 57 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $52,825 |
| 31 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $50,043 |
| 78 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $49,358 |
| 73 contributions · 2% of ranked | $40,408 |
A further $57,087 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,333,694) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.