Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Democracy on the Line
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00935015 · files quarterly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“Save Democracy 2026 is running a nationwide effort to confront and defeat Republican extremism up and down the ballot in the 2026 midterm election. To the halls of Congress, Governors mansions, Lieutenant Governorships, Secretaries of State, and State Legislative Chambers, Save Democracy 2026 will be investing millions of dollars to elect strong Democratic leaders who will protect our right to vote, ensure the security of our elections and reform our broken campaign finance system.
At every turn, we have witnessed Donald Trump and Republicans delegitimize our elections, purge millions of Americans from the voter rolls, impose burdensome voting restrictions, cripple the postal service, and block communities of color from their fundamental right to vote.”
SD 2026, on its own site, savedemocracypac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
4 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Same day voter registration
No excuse absentee voting
Prepaid return postage for absentee ballots
Online voter registration Automatic voter registration
Mobile voting options
At least 30 days of early voting Full restoration of the Voting Rights Act
Eliminating rigorous voter ID laws
Restored voting rights for convicted felons that have completed their sentences
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · savedemocracypac.com
Heading as listed on savedemocracypac.com ↗ (opens savedemocracypac.com at this heading)
Require 501 C4’s to disclose donors
Public financing for elections
Overturn the disastrous Citizens United Vs. FEC Supreme Court ruling
Disclose all online political ad purchases
Crack down on foreign interference in our elections
Donald Trump, Mike Johnson, Republican Legislatures and Secretaries of State all know that their power is contingent on the system being rigged in their favor.
We’re seeing it first-hand with Trump’s attempts to gerrymander the 2026 midterm election in his favor.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · savedemocracypac.com
Heading as listed on savedemocracypac.com ↗ (opens savedemocracypac.com at this heading)
Heading as listed on savedemocracypac.com ↗ (opens savedemocracypac.com at this heading)
We have seen Senate and House Republicans defund our elections, encourage foreign interference in our elections and allow the rich and powerful to unfairly influence our government.
House Democrats passed “For the People Act” House Resolution 1 in 2019 to expand voting rights and crack down on corruption in government.
Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans wouldn’t even bring the bill up for a vote.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · savedemocracypac.com
Heading as listed on savedemocracypac.com ↗ (opens savedemocracypac.com at this heading)
When then Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp was running for Governor in 2018, over 500,000 voters were removed from the voter rolls leading up to his election.
As the top election official in their state, Secretaries of State control election procedures across our country.
To fully see fair and secure elections, we need reform minded democratic leaders overseeing elections.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · savedemocracypac.com
Heading as listed on savedemocracypac.com ↗ (opens savedemocracypac.com at this heading)
At Donald Trump’s prompting, Republican legislators in Texas, North Carolina, Missouri, and Ohio worked with surgical precision to implement gerrymandered maps that now prevent communities of color from having fair representation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · savedemocracypac.com
Heading as listed on savedemocracypac.com ↗ (opens savedemocracypac.com at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to CRUSH MAGA PAC · 7 payments | $3M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $5K |
$3M from 2 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 4 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $3.3M from 4 sources in all.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 59,916 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $919K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $7,515,400
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9,593 contributions · 16% | $149,560 |
| 4,161 contributions · 7.1% | $64,955 |
Total reported disbursements $7,249,409
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $5,498,126 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$7.2M spent from Jan 2026 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $4.8M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
No lobbying disclosures matched
SD 2026 is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Its FEC record names Democracy on the Line as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
SD 2026 is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| 4,250 contributions · 6.5% | $59,388 |
| 2,418 contributions · 4.5% | $41,707 |
| 1,766 contributions · 3.9% | $35,464 |
| 1,871 contributions · 3.8% | $34,610 |
| 2,472 contributions · 3.7% | $34,258 |
| 2,661 contributions · 3.7% | $34,114 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 53,367 contributions · 90% of ranked | $800,714 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,679 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $28,673 |
| 3 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 188 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $2,243 |
| 304 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $2,084 |
| 20 contributions · 0.1% of ranked | $1,114 |
| 147 contributions · 0.1% of ranked | $1,084 |
| 83 contributions · 0.1% of ranked | $932 |
A further $31,398 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,225,149) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 50,352 contributions · 86% of ranked | $765,499 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,940 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $33,649 |
| 117 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $10,039 |
| 105 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $3,165 |
| 112 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $2,865 |
| 156 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $2,687 |
| 108 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $2,358 |
| 304 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $2,084 |
A further $31,398 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,225,149) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,697,891
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 107 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 23 payments · 16% of all spending | $1,155,902 |
| 7 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $198,001 |
| 43 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $164,886 |
| 2 payments · 1% of all spending | $72,213 |
| 2 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $39,500 |
| 3 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $22,500 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $13,300 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $13,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.