Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MO-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, MO-04
Representative since 2023
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
10 priorities from alfordforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
I am 100% Pro-Life. I will always staunchly defend the right to life and protect the rights of the unborn. Every life is a sacred blessing from God and must be protected.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
The Constitutional right to keep and bear arms is one of the most important freedoms that we hold. Law-abiding citizens of this great nation should always enjoy this right and have the ability to protect themselves.
I will always fight tirelessly to ensure that no one infringes upon our Second Amendment rights.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
Federal overreach has desecrated our educational institutions and eroded every parent’s right to be involved in their children’s education. This is abhorrent and wrong. I will always do everything in my power to ensure the primary education of our children is handled by the states and localities in which they reside, and I will always protect our children against the federal government’s injection of their liberal agenda into our classroom.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
Ensuring a strong national defense is core to America’s national security and it is one of the most important duties of our Congress.
Through my seat on the House Armed Services Committee, I am honored to play an active role in helping to bolster our national defense and provide a powerful deterrence to the pacing threat from China.
I will always work to protect and maintain our nation’s military dominance, and to support the men and women in uniform who work tirelessly to serve our great nation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
Our Founding Fathers envisioned a government of citizen legislators serving short terms but, unfortunately, Washington has become a city of entrenched career politicians who prey upon, and perpetuate, the brokenness of our current system and only serve to please special interest groups.
We must reimpose accountability in our government by implementing term limits and eliminating career politicians. As such, I cosponsored term limit legislation my first week in Congress and pledge to always support term limits.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
Washington’s reckless spending has led to a growing and almost insurmountable national debt. We must do everything in our power to end government waste, eliminate fraud, and reign in this out-of-control spending to reduce the American deficit and get our economy back on the right track.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
I am always proud to stand with and support our law enforcement heroes. As such, I will always oppose the radical left’s efforts to Defund the Police and will advocate for increased funding to support the men and women who put their lives on the line every day to protect our communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
Missouri is home to more than 95,000 farms, which make agriculture the largest sector of Missouri’s economy. The hardworking men and women in this industry are of the utmost importance as they help to feed, fuel, and clothe our entire nation.
Despite this work, the radical left seems hellbent on demonizing these great Americans and on overregulating them to the point of extinction.
Through my work on the House Agriculture Committee, I will always work tirelessly to protect our farmers and ranchers from the left’s radical death tax and EPA overregulation through WOTUS and farm dust, streams, and ponds.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
Joe Biden and Congressional Democrats have completely dismantled our economy through reckless spending, onerous overregulation, and ridiculous federal mandates which have crippled our businesses and caused Americans to suffer through record-high inflation.
We must do everything in our power to right the wrongs of this feckless administration by reigning in federal spending, eliminating unnecessary regulations, lowering taxes, and implementing pro-growth policies to reignite our economy and allow Americans to thrive and prosper.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
The radical left’s embrace of illegal immigration and their support for open borders has led to a massive influx of drugs and illegal activity flowing through our Southern Border.
Instead of demonizing the men and women who work hard to protect us from this invasion, we must secure our border by building the border wall, increasing border security officers, and better enforcing our existing immigration laws.
As your congressman, I will always advocate for border security and will fight hard to secure our borders!
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfordforcongress.com/on-the-issues
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 18 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
House Committee on Small Business
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Alford’s 51 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00792598
67¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.1M of $1.6M). Cash on hand went from $243.8K on Mar 31, 2025 to $757K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $137,237 | $110,820 | $243,825 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $221,324 | $52,686 | $412,463 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $299,090 | $74,719 | $636,835 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $252,581 | $166,316 | $723,100 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $194,095 | $177,041 | $740,153 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $267,606 | $227,210 | $782,049 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $16,035 | $55,683 | $747,401 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $196,697 | $170,302 | $773,796 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $14,701 | $31,451 | $757,047 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 84,638 votes (78%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 690 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $707.9K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 349 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $657.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 1 transfer was filed this cycle, totaling $50.1K.
Total reported receipts $1,599,366
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
39% of the money placed by state came from inside Missouri: $275.5K of $699.6K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 270 contributions · 39% | $275,454 |
| 72 contributions · 16% | $112,075 |
| 54 contributions · 8% | $56,000 |
| 32 contributions · 7.8% | $54,911 |
| 34 contributions · 5% | $34,800 |
| 44 contributions · 5% | $34,750 |
| 26 contributions · 3.5% | $24,250 |
| 9 contributions · 1.9% | $13,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 42 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 60 contributions · 10% of ranked | $58,445 |
| Written instead of an employer · 33 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $36,750 |
| 4 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 10 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $8,750 |
| 3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $47,650 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($17,860) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $859,905
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 630 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
15 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $154,902 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21 payments · 25% of all spending | $267,391 |
| 2 payments · 9.4% of all spending | $100,140 |
| 2 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $48,554 |
| 2 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $44,890 |
| 12 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $39,459 |
| 6 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $33,900 |
| 15 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $23,345 |
| 2 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $22,104 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 53 contributions · 12% of ranked | $81,050 |
| 141 contributions · 11% of ranked | $70,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 63 contributions · 10% of ranked | $67,445 |
| 28 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $29,000 |
| 16 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $25,250 |
| 19 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $24,440 |
| 6 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 15 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $17,500 |
A further $39,900 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($17,860) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.