Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: End Citizens United
A political action committee related to Let America Vote (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00632398 · files monthly
“We have a voting problem in America. Voting in our country has never been easy, but there’s a new challenge: Politicians are trying to stop Americans from voting because of who they are likely to vote for in an election.
Extreme voter suppression laws that disproportionately impact people based on their race or ethnicity, gender, age, or income have started popping up all over the country. If we don’t fight back, more and more Americans will become disenfranchised.”
LET America Vote PAC, on its own site, letamericavote.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Extreme voter suppression laws that disproportionately impact people based on their race or ethnicity, gender, age, or income are popping up all over the country at an alarming pace.
If we don’t fight back, more and more Americans will become disenfranchised and lose their voice in our democracy.
Over the past decade, momentum on voting rights has gone dangerously in the wrong direction.
That is the mission of Let America Vote.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · letamericavote.org/about
Heading as listed on letamericavote.org/about ↗ (opens letamericavote.org/about at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LET AMERICA VOTE PAC · 1 payment | $75K |
$75K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LET AMERICA VOTE PAC · 32 payments | $4M |
$4M across 1 recipient committee, or 69% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 49,632 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $949.3K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $5,170,034
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7,594 contributions · 17% | $164,246 |
| 3,473 contributions · 6.8% | $64,804 |
Total reported disbursements $5,822,893
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$5.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $792.6K, January 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
A political action committee related to Let America Vote Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
LET America Vote PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| 4,740 contributions · 6.8% | $64,170 |
| 2,156 contributions · 5.9% | $55,641 |
| 2,469 contributions · 4.9% | $46,788 |
| 1,966 contributions · 3.5% | $33,448 |
| 1,789 contributions · 3.3% | $31,356 |
| 1,888 contributions · 3.3% | $31,011 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,895 contributions · 28% of ranked | $48,849 |
| Written instead of an employer · 410 contributions · 13% of ranked | $22,918 |
| Written instead of an employer · 341 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $9,887 |
| 1 contribution · 2.8% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 13 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $3,850 |
| 224 contributions · 2% of ranked | $3,536 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $2,000 |
A further $760,012 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,174,420) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 39,535 contributions · 78% of ranked | $692,512 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,441 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $46,331 |
| 116 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $7,575 |
| 285 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $6,771 |
| 5 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $6,250 |
| 192 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $5,081 |
| 13 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $3,850 |
| 227 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $3,676 |
A further $58,371 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,174,420) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $5,646,918
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 684 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
17 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $3,719 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 32 payments · 69% of all spending | $4,025,000 |
| 29 payments · 12% of all spending | $714,721 |
| 16 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $422,550 |
| 441 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $190,432 |
| 7 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $94,870 |
| 7 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $62,769 |
| 8 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $45,936 |
| 13 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $39,278 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.