Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › PA-02 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, PA-02
Representative since 2015
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
Brendan F. Boyle’s words are not shown
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 22 times in the 119th Congress.
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Boyle’s 57 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00543363
29¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($827.9K of $2.9M). Cash on hand went from $4M on Mar 31, 2025 to $5.9M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $220,388 | $43,266 | $4,015,405 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $491,660 | $386,992 | $4,120,073 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $610,266 | $61,029 | $4,669,310 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $199,844 | $56,823 | $4,812,331 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $244,022 | $96,297 | $4,960,057 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $331,918 | $44,353 | $5,247,622 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $353,859 | $40,963 | $5,560,518 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $357,037 | $68,649 | $5,848,905 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $74,861 | $29,519 | $5,894,247 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
32 endorsers listed on Brendan F. Boyle’s own campaign site: 1 party, 6 officials, 21 unions, 4 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Philadelphia Controller
Congressional Black Caucus Chair
U.S. House Democratic Caucus Chair
“I’m proud to join CBCPAC in endorsing my good friend and colleague, Brendan Boyle, for re-election to Pennsylvania’s 2nd District. As a lifelong Philadelphian, Brendan knows what it means to effectively advocate for the many diverse communities he represents,” said CBC member and Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries (NY-8). “Whether it’s standing up for union families, communities of color or anyone who needs a voice in Congress, Brendan has been there for his constituents. As we’ve fought to pass important legislation such as the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, Brendan has been one of our greatest champions. When we passed emergency legislation to support small business owners during COVID-19 shutdowns, including minority business owners in Philadelphia, Brendan was a leading force in getting it done,” said Chairman Jeffries.”
Congressman
State Representative
State Representative
For the full list of Progressive Turnout Project 2022 endorsements, CLICK HERE.
“I’m honored to receive the endorsement of the Progressive Turnout Project, an organization that is on the forefront of organizing across our country to engage in the most effective and basic way to win elections: talking directly to voters,” said Congressman Boyle. “Whether at the doorstep, on the phone or through other means, the way that we as Democrats will succeed in 2022 and beyond is by proactively engaging with voters on priority issues. This is how we won control of the House in 2018, and how we defeated Donald Trump and won control of the Senate in 2020.”
Advanced · 49,625 votes (100%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 556 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 384 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $477.2K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 3 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $167.1K.
Total reported receipts $2,883,855
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
23% of the money placed by state came from inside Pennsylvania: $108.8K of $477.2K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 137 contributions · 23% | $108,811 |
| 48 contributions · 19% | $89,750 |
| 53 contributions · 12% | $56,350 |
| 20 contributions · 8.1% | $38,850 |
| 36 contributions · 5.8% | $27,685 |
| 19 contributions · 4.8% | $23,125 |
| 7 contributions · 3.9% | $18,500 |
| 7 contributions · 3.9% | $18,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 25 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 85 contributions · 25% of ranked | $117,536 |
| Written instead of an employer · 64 contributions · 7% of ranked | $33,025 |
| 6 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $13,600 |
| 3 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $3,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($20,387) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $6,172 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $754,633
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 724 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
28 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $154,936 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 37% of all spending | $305,000 |
| 29 payments · 19% of all spending | $154,863 |
| 7 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $60,789 |
| 8 payments · 5.2% of all spending | $42,709 |
| 6 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $37,159 |
| 2 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $26,005 |
| 25 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $17,882 |
| 8 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $12,925 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 70 contributions · 20% of ranked | $92,986 |
| 20 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $41,250 |
| 60 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $31,300 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 15 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $24,550 |
| 11 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $17,650 |
| 7 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $17,500 |
| 11 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $16,250 |
| 16 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $14,584 |
A further $3,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($20,387) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.