Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › KS-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, KS-04
Representative since 2017
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
8 priorities from estesforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
I will never support the Federal Government taking power further away from We the People. From our Second Amendment rights, to the education of our children, to our right to worship as we choose, our liberties must be protected from those who would use power to tell us what to believe and how to educate our children.
The 2nd Amendment is a cornerstone of our Bill of Rights. I firmly believe that every law-abiding citizen has a right to defend themselves, their family and their property. I will fight against efforts in Washington to take away these rights. I am a proud NRA member, and as your Congressman, I will continue supporting the rights of gun owners, sportsmen and hunters.
I believe that every human being has an inalienable right to life. I am proudly pro-life, and I’ve introduced legislation to protect unborn babies with a prenatal Down syndrome diagnosis. I’ve also worked to defund Planned Parenthood and ensure that taxpayer dollars are not used for abortions – a common sense stance shared by a majority of Americans.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · estesforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on estesforcongress.com ↗ (opens estesforcongress.com at this heading)
Protecting the country is the most critical role our federal government plays, and it’s one I take very seriously. I’m so proud to represent the men and women of McConnell Air Force Base. Each day, these courageous patriots from across the country are defending our freedoms and protecting our citizens in a dangerous world. I’ve worked to secure more tankers for McConnell and supported pay raises for our troops. I’ve also had a focus on constituent services in my Wichita office to help our veterans who deserve our respect and support.
When it comes to protecting the United States, our nation is under attack on multiple fronts. After four years of the failed Biden administration border, Republicans in Congress have stepped up to secure the border, reduce illegal crossings, and deport the worst of the worst. Our policies are clearly working, but the contrast is stark – Democrats tried to convince the American people for four years that the border was secure when it clearly wasn’t. Given the opportunity, they would take us right back to an unsafe border with millions of illegal criminals coming into our country.
Beyond our borders, we have crises overseas. The Democrats’ botched Afghanistan withdrawal and foreign policy weakness allowed Russia to invade Ukraine and Hamas to attack Israel. Not only that, but for 47 years, Iran has chanted “Death to America” while being the largest sponsor of terrorism and directly and indirectly killing Americans. President after president has warned about the dangers of a nuclear Iran, but now we are on the path to eliminating the threat and providing an opportunity for stability and peace in the Middle East. These conflicts abroad are consequential to our safety here at home, and Congress has worked to support our men and women in uniform so that we can end the conflicts that started under the previous administration and continue moving toward greater peace.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · estesforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on estesforcongress.com ↗ (opens estesforcongress.com at this heading)
Individuals in the private sector grow the economy, not the government. That’s why I’ve been a major proponent of lower taxes for everyday Kansans. In 2017, we passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, major legislation that lowered taxes for nearly every American. Even The New York Times admitted that most Americans received a tax cut despite repeated false claims from the media and the left. In 2025, Republicans continued to deliver for Kansans, making the most meaningful elements of TCJA permanent, expanding the Child Tax Credit, increasing the standard deduction, eliminating taxes on overtime and tips, and implementing a senior tax deduction that essentially covers Social Security taxes for 88% of Americans.
While big-government politicians look at ways to pad the coffers of the U.S. Treasury, I will continue fighting for you to keep more of your hard-earned money. You – not Washington – are the best person to spend and invest your money.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · estesforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on estesforcongress.com ↗ (opens estesforcongress.com at this heading)
Too many politicians want to use health care as a political talking point, but they aren’t interested in real solutions.
Health care is more than just affordable access to health care – it’s about making our country healthy. I’ve supported the efforts to Make America Healthy Again. So many parents in Kansas have worked to remove artificial dyes and additives from their diet and are taking steps to provide healthier options for their families. They have fought against Washington bureaucrats who have allowed the status quo to dictate health policy for our nation. Not anymore – families have allies in our nation’s capital who want to join them to Make America Healthy Again.
Last year, I was also pleased to support the Working Families Tax Cuts that includes $50 billion for rural health care. The legislation thankfully passed, but every Democrat voted against this critical funding for rural health care. Kansas will see $222 million of this funding – critical funding following 16 years of rising premiums and less affordability. Instead of addressing the real problems with health care costs, Democrats have tried to mask it by covering over high prices with expensive subsidies that reward the insurance companies and punish patients. I’ve cosponsored legislation to provide transparency to health care and ensure families and individuals in the 4th District are the primary voice in making their health care decisions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · estesforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on estesforcongress.com ↗ (opens estesforcongress.com at this heading)
Unelected bureaucracies in Washington have far too much control in our lives. Agencies like the EPA inflict unnecessary burdens on Kansans through massive, overreaching regulations. That’s why I’ve strongly supported policies that limit the federal government, roll back unnecessary regulations and give more power to Kansans and their local governments. In order to really change Washington, we have to remove power from those sitting in cubicles handing down rules and regulations more than a thousand miles away.
The insiders run too much in Washington. One of the biggest problems in Washington is the revolving door between Congress and the lobbying industry. Congressional votes should be based on the best interests of their districts and the nation, not on lining up a high paying lobbyist job. I support legislation that would prevent a former member of Congress from working as a lobbyist for five years following the completion of their term. This five-year ban would help shut the revolving door and lessen the influence of special interests in Washington. Also, I oppose special perks for members of Congress, which is why I support legislation that would require Congress to live by the same rules as the American people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · estesforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on estesforcongress.com ↗ (opens estesforcongress.com at this heading)
Throughout my time in Congress, I’ve worked on advancing legislation that puts more money in Kansans’ pockets and encourages growth. As an engineer in the private sector, working in the aerospace industry, and as the former Sedgwick County and Kansas State Treasurer, I’ve seen firsthand what it takes to create jobs and the problems that occur when government gets in the way. I am committed to fighting to roll back the burdensome regulations and out-of-control spending that keep the economy from reaching its full potential. I will work for common sense solutions that prioritize the American people over government red tape.
Growing up on my family’s farm that has been in operation for over 100 years, I’ve seen firsthand the effects of onerous government regulations on farmers. I have fought the intrusive arm of the EPA and other agencies. I will support free and fair trade so that Kansas farmers can continue to feed the world. I will work to put an end to burdensome tax policies that harm our family farms.
The 4th district has felt the pain inflicted by the Obama administration on our economy. Manufacturing jobs have disappeared and millions of Americans and many Kansans have left the labor force. As an engineer in the private sector, working in the aerospace industry and as former Sedgwick County Treasurer, I have seen firsthand what it takes to create jobs and the problems that occur when government gets in the way. I am committed to fighting to roll back the burdensome regulations and out of control spending that keep the economy from reaching its full potential. I will work for common-sense solutions that prioritize the American people over government red tape.
Growing up on my family’s farm that has been in operation for over 100 years, I’ve seen firsthand the effects of onerous government regulations on farmers. I will fight the intrusive arm of the EPA and other agencies. I will support free and fair trade so that Kansas farmers can continue to feed the world. I will work to put an end to burdensome tax policies that harm our family farms.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · estesforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on estesforcongress.com ↗ (opens estesforcongress.com at this heading)
Growing up in rural Kansas on my parents’ land, I experienced the work ethic of farm life. In addition to our chores, my siblings and I learned the fundamentals of ag production in Kansas. And just like the ever-changing weather in our state, we also experienced the ups and downs of working the land.
In Congress, I’ve been a champion for the policies that have a positive impact on farmers and ranchers for generations to come. While some grab headlines about current markets and prices, my focus has always been on long-term solutions that create open markets for ag producers, dismantle burdensome regulations like WOTUS and the lesser prairie-chicken protections, ensure the death tax doesn’t crush family farms, and provide common sense safeguards for the ag producers that are feeding, clothing and fueling our world. There’s a reason the Kansas Farm Bureau has consistently endorsed me – and I’ve consistently worked with them and the farmers and ranchers across Kansas to ensure the policies that we enact in Washington are the right policies for the Sunflower State.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · estesforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on estesforcongress.com ↗ (opens estesforcongress.com at this heading)
Families in the 4th district know they have to balance their budgets. Business owners understand they won’t be in business long without a balanced budget. Even local and state governments have to balance their books. The federal government should not play by a different set of rules. I have supported balanced budget amendments that will force the federal government to get its financial house in order. I’ve even proposed a simple 1% accross-the-board spending reduction – while protecting our Armed Services – yet every Democrat voted against it.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · estesforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on estesforcongress.com ↗ (opens estesforcongress.com at this heading)
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 17 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Ways and Means
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Estes’ 48 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00632067
94¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($2.1M of $2.2M). Cash on hand went from $1.3M on Mar 31, 2025 to $1.3M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $248,757 | $195,004 | $1,252,029 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $388,404 | $244,946 | $1,395,486 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $240,916 | $152,724 | $1,483,678 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $251,996 | $106,175 | $1,629,500 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $371,671 | $378,324 | $1,622,846 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $339,605 | $195,876 | $1,766,575 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $13,687 | $22,584 | $1,757,677 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $310,832 | $432,316 | $1,636,194 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $37,909 | $348,744 | $1,325,359 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 66,613 votes (81%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 615 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.3M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 20 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $383.2K.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 249 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $292.3K.
Total reported receipts $2,203,776
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
52% of the money placed by state came from inside Kansas: $152.3K of $291.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 136 contributions · 52% | $152,268 |
| 28 contributions · 11% | $32,251 |
| 26 contributions · 10% | $29,250 |
| 12 contributions · 6.2% | $18,000 |
| 6 contributions · 3.9% | $11,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% | $7,000 |
| 7 contributions · 2.2% | $6,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 24 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 46 contributions · 12% of ranked | $31,700 |
| 7 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $16,600 |
| 9 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $11,800 |
| 4 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 12 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $8,350 |
| 4 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $20,324 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($13,148) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $2,342 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,610,920
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 846 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
68 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $240,177 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 17% of all spending | $361,372 |
| 14 payments · 15% of all spending | $317,830 |
| 4 payments · 9.6% of all spending | $199,000 |
| 20 payments · 7.5% of all spending | $156,532 |
| 21 payments · 6.2% of all spending | $129,503 |
| 1 payment · 5.8% of all spending | $121,000 |
| 97 payments · 5.2% of all spending | $107,008 |
| 25 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $29,479 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 49 contributions · 13% of ranked | $36,700 |
| 18 contributions · 8.4% of ranked | $23,520 |
| 18 contributions · 8.2% of ranked | $22,824 |
| 11 contributions · 7% of ranked | $19,500 |
| 15 contributions · 6% of ranked | $16,750 |
| 19 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $16,100 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 10 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $16,100 |
| 11 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $13,000 |
A further $13,824 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($13,148) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.