Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TX-26 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, TX-26
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
8 priorities from brandongillforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
In record time, President Trump, Secretary Noem, and Congress shut down and secured the southern border, ending Biden’s open-border abomination. I introduced legislation to codify President Trump’s Remain in Mexico policy, and we passed the One Big Beautiful Bill to fully fund our Border Patrol agents and complete the wall. Now, the work in Congress continues to ensure our immigration system supports the American worker and that Leftist open-border policies never return.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brandongillforcongress.com/issues
The past few years of Bidenomics left our nation in disaster for American families. The cost of living skyrocketed while wages collapsed. When President Trump took office, we turned the corner—but rebuilding the economy doesn’t happen overnight. Congress must continue to drive down costs and make the unaffordable affordable again. Its time to pass legislation to address housing affordability, prioritize the American worker, cut wasteful spending, and support a balanced budged.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brandongillforcongress.com/issues
We cannot be a free country if we are dependent on foreign adversaries for our energy. Texas is the energy capital of the country, and we should lead the nation in becoming energy independent under President Trump. A “Texas First” energy approach is the priority. It’s time to cut red tape across the industry and “drill, baby, drill!”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brandongillforcongress.com/issues
The individual right to own a firearm has roots going back to — and beyond — our nation’s founding. Firearms constituted a main form of defense from predators, criminals, and a tyrannical government. They also helped our nation tame this land from sea to shining sea. Even today, farmers, ranchers, and hunters rely on firearms to protect livestock and provide for their families. Outside of that, millions of Americans keep firearms to protect their families from opportunistic burglars, criminal gangs, and random acts of violence. But most importantly, our Second Amendment exists so that we Americans can protect ourselves against a despotic, overreaching government. Our Second Amendment is the one that protects all the others. As a proud gun owner myself, I stand by our Founding documents— Our Second Amendment shall not be infringed.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brandongillforcongress.com/issues
President Trump has rebuilt American foreign policy by prioritizing peace through strength. Israel stands as a beacon of democracy and stability in the volatile Middle East. I firmly support Israel's right to defend itself against the barbaric assaults of Hamas. The international community must unequivocally denounce Hamas's terrorism and stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Israel in its fight against these threats to peace and civilization.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brandongillforcongress.com/issues
Our children deserve protection from irreversible decisions pushed by ideological agendas. Subjecting minors to life-altering surgeries for gender transition is outrageous. We adamantly oppose any practice that risks the well-being and future of our youth in the name of ideological conformity.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brandongillforcongress.com/issues
Our educational institutions have been hijacked by radical ideologies that undermine critical thinking and true academic inquiry. We will not stand idly by as cultural Marxism seeks to indoctrinate our youth. It's time to purge these corrosive ideologies from our schools and restore education to its rightful purpose of fostering open-mindedness and intellectual diversity. Parents - not radical, left-wing teachers - should determine school curriculums.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brandongillforcongress.com/issues
I am unabashedly pro-life. Every child is made in God's image and deserves the right to life. I will continue to fight to protect the unborn and support the sanctity of life.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brandongillforcongress.com/issues
91% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 58 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House Committee on the Judiciary
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Gill’s 27 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00857359
75¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($6M of $7.9M). Cash on hand went from $142.2K on Mar 31, 2025 to $2.1M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $76,519 | $62,185 | $142,157 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $208,808 | $63,609 | $287,356 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $952,883 | $471,757 | $768,482 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $744,777 | $976,777 | $536,482 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $440,562 | $351,106 | $625,938 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $675,628 | $290,652 | $1,010,914 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,118,038 | $717,439 | $1,411,512 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $3,076,678 | $2,532,944 | $1,955,246 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $645,579 | $508,490 | $2,092,335 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
11 endorsers listed on Brandon Gill’s own campaign site: 8 officials, 1 organization, 2 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
President
“It is my great honor to ENDORSE Brandon Gill for U.S. Congress in TX-26... Brandon will not let you down. Onward to VICTORY!" - President Donald Trump”
“Brandon Gill Has all the best characteristics of a Texan: Dedicated, Hardworking, and Resilient. With a deep understanding of what it means to take on the left and the corrupt mainstream media, Brandon has set himself apart from other candidates and is the best qualified to fight the radical left and their disastrous agenda in Congress. I am proud to endorse hum for TX-26 and look forward to seeing him win his race.”
“Brandon Gill represents one of the best America First candidates for Congress. America and North Texas need a fighter like Gill to slash Washington spending, secure the Southern Border, and protect conservative values from Washington elites. In Congress, Brandon Gill will live by the principle of doing what you said you would do.”
“Brandon Gill is a friend & a man I trust to be a bold, fearless fighter & champion of Conservative values. I trust Brandon will fight to secure the border. I trust Brandon will put America First & help continue the MAGA movement in North Texas. I proudly endorse Brandon & urge all voters in the district to support him.”
“I'm proudly endorsing Brandon Gill for Congress in TX-26. Congress is in desperate need of true Trump republicans, and Brandon is as good as they get. He will make a great congressman. If you live in TX-26, vote Brandon Gill!”
“I wholeheartedly endorse Brandon Gull for Texas' 26th Congressional District. Brandon possesses the necessary qualities and skills to excel in this position and works tirelessly to promote and maintain an America First Agenda.”
“When I learned Brandon Gill was running for Congress, I knew who to support in the upcoming republican primary. Brandon is MAGA all the way, and I have no doubt he will stand by our conservative principles. I hope to serve with him soon. I am proud to endorse Brandon Gill for Congress!”
“Our nation needs true conservative leaders who will fight to secure our borders and restore fiscal sanity in Washington. In TX-26 Brandon Gill is endorsed by President Trump and is the future of our conservative movement. Brandon has my complete endorsement.”
Electing strong conservative candidates to Congress.
Denton County Republican Precinct Chair
“Brandon is a breath of fresh air. He is young smart, a businessman, a rancher, and a true conservative. We need young blood, a new generation of leaders (not another politician) in Congress who will stand for our conservative principles and will always put America First. He will Fight for Texas. Brandon Is our future! I fully Endorse Brandon Gill for CD26!”
Advanced · 73,610 votes (91%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Won · 147,569 votes (60%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 52,716 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.4M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 223 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $483.8K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 15 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $401.2K.
Total reported receipts $7,939,470
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
32% of the money placed by state came from inside Texas: $443K of $1.4M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10,232 contributions · 32% | $442,997 |
| 5,361 contributions · 10% | $140,106 |
| 5,938 contributions · 10% | $137,356 |
| 1,717 contributions · 3.8% | $51,912 |
| 1,181 contributions · 3.2% | $43,565 |
| 1,617 contributions · 2.9% | $39,786 |
| 2,512 contributions · 2.8% | $39,044 |
| 1,418 contributions · 2.3% | $31,344 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 51 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 47,491 contributions · 73% of ranked | $904,674 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,269 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $48,086 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $13,800 |
| 1 contribution · 1% of ranked | $12,396 |
| 208 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $10,667 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked | $8,500 |
A further $125,537 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,087,616) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $10,500 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $2,928,014
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 3,679 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
37 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $89,611 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 50 payments · 12% of all spending | $719,068 |
| 269 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $302,477 |
| 267 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $265,683 |
| 243 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $202,000 |
| 380 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $176,005 |
| 18 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $106,713 |
| 204 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $104,630 |
| 178 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $88,508 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 47,491 contributions · 73% of ranked | $904,674 |
| 170 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $38,563 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 192 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $22,837 |
| 4 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $15,316 |
| 241 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $13,594 |
| 1 contribution · 1% of ranked | $12,396 |
| 20 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $10,813 |
| 208 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $10,667 |
A further $125,300 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,087,616) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.