Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › OK-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, OK-04
Representative since 2003
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
9 priorities from tomcoleforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Tom believes that every American should feel secure about our elections system. That’s why he’s supported the SAVE and SAVE American Act, which mandates voter ID across the country and the requirement of being an American citizen if you are going to vote in our elections. He also sponsored legislation to prevent private entities from influencing elections by using private grants to county election boards (Zucker bucks) to drive out turnout and partisan districts.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tomcoleforcongress.com/issues/securing-our-elections
Tom has an A rating with the NRA and has been proud to stand strong for our second amendment rights. Tom has been invaluable, fighting against the Far-Left’s agenda in the House of Representatives to weaken the God-given and constitutionally protected right of every American to be able to protect themselves and their families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tomcoleforcongress.com/issues/preserving-our-second-amendment
Oklahomans know very well the importance that the state plays in keeping our nation safe. From protecting our military installations from cuts and continuing to work to add missions, to continually winning pay raises for our military men and women, Tom fights every day for those in uniform and the state of Oklahoma.
Tom also believes in keeping defense spending prioritized to meet the ever-increasing threats of near-peer adversaries in China and Russia. Tom will work every day to make sure we have a military that is the best equipped and best led in the world.
Furthermore, Tom also opposed the disastrous Iran Deal which has led to President Trump’s decision to strike Iran and degrade their ability to threaten the United States and their neighbors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tomcoleforcongress.com/issues/national-security
Tom successfully fought to end the oil export ban and continues to fight for American Energy Independence and Oklahoma’s economy by standing up to Far-Left Democrats who want to put hardworking Oklahomans out of work and place an estimated $65,000 per family tax burden on families with the Green New Deal.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tomcoleforcongress.com/issues/energyindependence
Tom has a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee, An A+ Rating from the Susan B. Anthony List, and has always fought to protect the unborn. Even before videos uncovered the heinous actions of Planned Parenthood, Tom took action to completely eliminate federal funding for family planning that funds groups such as Planned Parenthood. Tom also cosponsored the Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2015 and helped secure passage of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which bans abortion after 20 weeks. Tom also cosponsored the Health Care Conscience Rights Act, which protects individual’s religious liberties and allows companies such as Hobby Lobby to refuse to participate in healthcare plans that fund abortion.
Currently, Tom, with other House Republicans, are standing strong with the Trump Administration in protecting the Hyde Amendment which has prevented taxpayer funding of Abortion for decades.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tomcoleforcongress.com/issues/protecting-the-unborn
Tom has been a fiscal hawk while voting for the structural changes needed to tackle our debt and deficit. Tom opposed Biden era trillion dollar debt bombs like the American Rescue Plan, and voted for the first substantive reforms to Medicaid and SNAP in years as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill saving the taxpayers trillions of dollars over the next several years. He also supported the incredibly important rescissions package eliminating woke wasteful spending under Biden’s USAID and public broadcasting, saving taxpayers billions.
As Chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee, Tom has been a champion for taxpayers in cutting waste, identifying fraud, and prioritizing the funding of critical functions of our government for the American people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tomcoleforcongress.com/issues/debt-and-spending
Tom has long been a strong supporter of our veterans. The son of an Air Force veteran, he has been honored by the Oklahoma Veterans Council and the VFW of Oklahoma for his work to advance the care and quality of life for Oklahoma veterans and their families. When reports emerged of severe mismanagement at the Department of Veterans Affairs, Tom helped win an additional 10% increase in funding for veterans’ health and services and has continued to deliver historic funding and oversight for our nation’s best.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tomcoleforcongress.com/issues/veterans
Tom has always believed that border security is the most important component of our immigration policy. Tom voted in favor of the One Big Beautiful Bill which rushed historic resources to President Trump and helped deliver the most secure border in our nation’s history.
The Biden administration’s crisis on the border, combined with the Far-Left Democrats government shutdown theater only indicate the fight is not over on securing the border and Tom will always stand with the American people for a safe and secure border.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tomcoleforcongress.com/issues/securingourborder
Tom continues to fight for policies that allow the private sector to flourish. The best way for government to create jobs is to get out of the way and let American ingenuity and entrepreneurship thrive. Far too often, there is a disconnect between Washington bureaucrats and the real world, leading to job-stifling regulations that provide little, if any, benefit to Americans. Oklahomans know how to get our economy growing again. It takes a smaller, less intrusive government, cutting burdensome red tape, lowering taxes and stopping out-of-control spending and that’s what Tom is fighting for every day in Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tomcoleforcongress.com/issues/growing-the-economy
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 19 times in the 119th Congress.
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Cole’s 45 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00379735
86¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($3.7M of $4.3M). Cash on hand went from $2M on Mar 31, 2025 to $2.4M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $753,119 | $489,780 | $2,043,612 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $882,477 | $425,668 | $2,500,421 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $543,635 | $447,130 | $2,596,926 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $265,800 | $361,940 | $2,500,786 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $765,576 | $470,702 | $2,795,660 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 27, 2026 | $381,775 | $604,160 | $2,573,275 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $235,510 | $209,052 | $2,599,733 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $382,079 | $350,781 | $2,631,031 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $71,710 | $332,347 | $2,370,395 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
1 endorser listed on Tom Cole’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
“Congressman Tom Cole is a Tremendous Champion for Oklahoma’s 4th Congressional District! As the Chairman of the POWERFUL House Appropriations Committee, Tom knows the America First Policies required to Create GREAT Jobs, Cut Taxes and Regulations, and Champion our Nation’s Golden Age. He is fighting tirelessly to Advance American Energy DOMINANCE, Keep our now very Secure Border, SECURE, Strengthen our Military/Veterans, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment. Tom Cole has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election – HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN!”
Advanced · 52,694 votes (71%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,574 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.9M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 756 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.8M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 5 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $149.2K.
Total reported receipts $4,281,681
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
31% of the money placed by state came from inside Oklahoma: $602.4K of $1.9M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 727 contributions · 31% | $602,376 |
| 164 contributions · 13% | $257,150 |
| 135 contributions · 12% | $231,078 |
| 104 contributions · 9% | $172,617 |
| 36 contributions · 4.4% | $85,733 |
| 62 contributions · 4.4% | $84,940 |
| 46 contributions · 4.3% | $82,975 |
| 23 contributions · 4% | $77,400 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 41 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 535 contributions · 10% of ranked | $163,940 |
| 56 contributions · 9.6% of ranked | $154,150 |
| Written instead of an employer · 126 contributions · 9% of ranked | $144,596 |
| 30 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $35,000 |
| 34 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $34,100 |
| Written instead of an employer · 11 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $31,100 |
| 6 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $24,500 |
| 5 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $22,500 |
A further $3,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($118,886) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $3,902 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $3,337,729
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 464 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 15 payments · 24% of all spending | $889,196 |
| 3 payments · 14% of all spending | $499,608 |
| 8 payments · 10% of all spending | $384,716 |
| 18 payments · 10% of all spending | $369,421 |
| 39 payments · 7.1% of all spending | $262,292 |
| 2 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $165,050 |
| 43 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $103,662 |
| 7 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $96,231 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 66 contributions · 9.8% of ranked | $187,250 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 533 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $165,592 |
| 57 contributions · 8.3% of ranked | $157,650 |
| 65 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $137,758 |
| 57 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $88,350 |
| 82 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $68,949 |
| 27 contributions · 3% of ranked | $57,150 |
| 31 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $49,400 |
A further $1,816 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($118,886) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.