Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NC-08 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, NC-08
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
6 priorities from markharrisforcongress.org, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Mark fervently believes in the sanctity of all human life, from conception to natural end. A pivotal figure in the pro-life movement, he asserts that every life is invaluable. Mark is also a stalwart defender of traditional family values, having led the charge for the 2012 marriage amendment and consistently advocating for measures that uphold the foundations of our families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · markharrisforcongress.org/issues
Our nation's safety and sovereignty hinge upon robust border security. Mark asserts that the current state of our borders, exacerbated by Biden's weak border policies, has created unprecedented challenges for our nation. He is committed to fortifying our borders, supporting advanced technology, and rigorously enforcing our immigration laws to protect American citizens and preserve our nation's integrity.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · markharrisforcongress.org/issues
Mark, drawing inspiration from his father's WWII experiences, is unwavering in his commitment to a robust national defense. He emphasizes the need for a formidable military that deters threats, stands with allies, and above all, honors the sacrifices made by our servicemen and women, both during and after their service.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · markharrisforcongress.org/issues
While Mark firmly supports a strong public education system, he believes parents, not the Federal Government, should have the final say in how to educate their children. Whether public, private, charter, or homeschool, families should have full freedom to choose what works best for their children. Every child should have an opportunity to learn, grow, and succeed in the career path they choose. Mark will fight for policies that focus on local control, and maximum flexibility, and ensure that students have the most educational opportunities available to them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · markharrisforcongress.org/issues
A society that fails to uphold its laws emboldens those who break them. Mark firmly believes that the foundation of a safe community is the unwavering enforcement of our laws. By holding criminals accountable and championing rigorous law enforcement, Mark is dedicated to ensuring that every North Carolinian can live, work, and thrive in a secure and peaceful environment.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · markharrisforcongress.org/issues
A government that can't pay its bills is a government unworthy – and unable – to serve its people. That's why, since being elected to Congress, Mark has been a leading voice in the effort to cut the kind of excessive government spending that led to the record-high inflation we saw under the Biden Administration. He is determined to deliver legislation that will take the burden of higher costs off of American taxpayers, and is working to ensure the people of NC-08 have more take-home pay so that families can thrive again.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · markharrisforcongress.org/issues
92% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 52 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Agriculture
House Committee on Education and Workforce
House Committee on the Judiciary
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Harris’ 16 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00850404
75¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($935K of $1.2M). Cash on hand went from $154.2K on Mar 31, 2025 to $411.3K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $92,315 | $45,656 | $154,192 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $103,802 | $59,312 | $198,681 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $96,492 | $18,672 | $276,501 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $137,093 | $82,953 | $330,641 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $90,626 | $101,281 | $319,987 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $229,058 | $149,506 | $399,539 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $269,749 | $151,435 | $517,853 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $147,538 | $130,874 | $534,517 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $72,052 | $195,305 | $411,264 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 826 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $709.5K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 125 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $209.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 4 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $86.1K.
Total reported receipts $1,238,724
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
85% of the money placed by state came from inside North Carolina: $604K of $709.5K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 460 contributions · 85% | $604,019 |
| 10 contributions · 3.3% | $23,276 |
| 5 contributions · 2.8% | $20,000 |
| 54 contributions · 2.3% | $16,661 |
| 81 contributions · 2.2% | $15,708 |
| 3 contributions · 1.6% | $11,000 |
| 40 contributions · 0.6% | $4,257 |
| 4 contributions · 0.4% | $2,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 25 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 460 contributions · 23% of ranked | $162,984 |
| Written instead of an employer · 36 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $38,500 |
| 8 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $27,500 |
| 8 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $17,750 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $9,500 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($105,723) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $1,000 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $762,296
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 450 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,920 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 20 payments · 22% of all spending | $206,497 |
| 3 payments · 17% of all spending | $161,613 |
| 36 payments · 7.8% of all spending | $72,573 |
| 4 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $53,846 |
| 3 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $23,682 |
| 10 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $23,629 |
| 5 payments · 2% of all spending | $18,632 |
| 15 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $14,251 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 454 contributions · 22% of ranked | $155,184 |
| 28 contributions · 7.9% of ranked | $56,200 |
| 28 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $39,050 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 17 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $34,250 |
| 18 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $26,850 |
| 8 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $23,500 |
| 8 contributions · 3% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $14,000 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($105,723) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.