Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MS-03 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, MS-03
Representative since 2019
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
5 priorities from michaelguest.ms, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
As a Christian and follower of the Word of God, I believe God’s Covenant to Abraham grants overarching legitimacy to the nation of Israel and it is the duty of all Judeo-Christian nations to support the continued prosperity of Israel. Since its founding, Israel has remained a close ally of the United States and the history of relations between the two nations is one of friendship and comradery. Our strong bond with Israel is cemented in a strong foundation of shared values, morals, and beliefs, and it is in the best interest of the United States and Israel to extend our harmonious relationship into the future as an example of strong fellowship between nations.
America looks to the inspirational history of Israel as an example of the economic, political, and social stability democracy can bring to a country. Israel’s economic, diplomatic, and cultural success in the face of a constant barrage of enemy attack and subterfuge serves as a beacon of hope for the advancement of peace throughout all nations. As a contemporary in the effort for stability and prosperity in the Middle East, Israel has served alongside the United States as a steadfast ally. The United States, in return, has provided financial, military, and diplomatic support to Israel in order to further our shared goals.
If elected to Congress, I will support measures that will strengthen the bond between the United States and Israel and I will lend my voice in Congress to assert the continued support of the United States to Israel as one of our strongest foreign policy agendas.
In short, our shared history and commitment to strong, continued relations with the nation of Israel can be summed up by President Reagan’s statements at the National Conference of Christians and Jews on March 23, 1982, “Since the rebirth of the State of Israel, there has been an ironclad bond between that democracy and this one … America has never flinched from its commitment to the State of Israel–a commitment which remains unshakable.”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelguest.ms/stand-with-israel
Peace in the Middle East requires a strong presence from the United States and its allies, and no ally has been more stalwartly in the advancement of democracy and order in the Middle East than Israel. In the face of the ever constant threat of Islamic terrorism at home and abroad, it is always in the interest of the United States to support Israeli military, counter-insurgency, and counter-terrorism efforts. In an effort to advance our own national security and the security of our allies, I support efforts of the United States to arm and equip Israel with the necessary defenses to protect their resources and, most importantly, the lives of their citizens. If elected to Congress, I will support policies that increase the
ability of Israel to defend itself. Pro-Israeli policy is paramount in our efforts to protect our interests overseas, therefore I support the authorization of U.S. security assistance for Israel as outlined in the 2016 U.S.-Israel Memorandum of Understanding, extending authorization of loan guarantees to Israel, a joint assessment between the U.S. and Israel of the type and amount of munitions needed by Israeli forces to defend itself against terrorist groups, and all other provisions outlined in the United States-Israel Security Assistance Authorization Act of 2018.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelguest.ms/stand-with-israel
Due to its continued sponsorship of terrorism, aggressive military actions towards citizens in Syria and the backing of Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad, and its continued violation of human rights against its own citizens through judicial repression, Iran should be considered an aggressive enemy of the U.S. and its allies and their development of nuclear weapons should be prevented at all costs. Despite efforts of previous administrations to curb Iran’s threat to the U.S. and Israel in the “Iran Nuclear Deal,” Iran continues to test ballistic missiles which violate U.N. prohibitions and many are skeptical whether or not Iran is honoring the provisions set forth in the agreement to prohibit Iran’s development of nuclear weapons. Furthermore, the agreement does not restrict Iran’s ability to manufacture nuclear weapons after the provisions expire.
Therefore, I support further sanctions designed to hinder Iran’s testing of ballistic missiles, halt the state’s sponsorship of terrorism and terrorist activities, and deter further violations of human rights by Iran against its own citizens and the citizens of other countries.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelguest.ms/stand-with-israel
The call for an International economic boycott of Israeli goods is a thinly veiled attempt to delegitimize Israel and the continued targeting of Israeli goods and products is unsound and irrational. Not only is economic prosperity in Israel is a boon to the global economy, but strong business development is key in mending cultural divisions and creating peace in the region. Israel continues to prosper as one of the most diverse countries in the world and the underlying goals of the boycott on Israel are counterintuitive to their own defined purposes of creating harmony in the region.
If elected, I will support the Israeli Anti-Boycott Act and other Anti-Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) legislation. Policies that reiterate Congress’s opposition to BDS activities and strive to end commercial activities with the sole intent of harming Israel’s economy are needed to protect Israeli business owners and further stabilization efforts in the region.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelguest.ms/stand-with-israel
Peace will be realized in the Middle East through the efforts of the nations in the region, not through impositions of third parties such as the United Nations. As a sovereign nation, Israel has the sole right to decisions about it’s long term security and must be present, along with the Palestinian Authority, at the negotiating table for any peace-making provisions to be considered legitimate. Furthermore, the Palestinian Authority must cease its involvement with terrorist organizations and demonstrate its commitment to peace in Israel. It is the responsibility of the United States to use its veto power in the United Nations Assembly to block any efforts made by the international community to impose peace on Israel or mitigate the efforts of Israel and the Palestinian Authority to create peace on their own terms.
If elected, I will continue to publicly iterate my support of a peace process framework developed through negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and I openly reject any form of an imposed solution upon the state of Israel from the international community.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelguest.ms/stand-with-israel
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 14 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
House Committee on Homeland Security
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Guest’s 43 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00665752
75¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($820.6K of $1.1M). Cash on hand went from $542.6K on Mar 31, 2025 to $780.1K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $61,068 | $29,815 | $542,599 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $68,694 | $111,810 | $499,483 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $377,946 | $54,117 | $823,313 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $90,544 | $96,889 | $816,968 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 18, 2026 | $26,594 | $27,913 | $815,649 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $137,934 | $11,654 | $941,930 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $59,980 | $39,394 | $962,515 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $193,252 | $104,157 | $1,051,610 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $73,331 | $344,883 | $780,058 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Advanced · 0 votes (0%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 347 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $401.6K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 246 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $472.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,089,344
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
62% of the money placed by state came from inside Mississippi: $250.2K of $401.6K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 217 contributions · 62% | $250,170 |
| 46 contributions · 11% | $45,622 |
| 35 contributions · 7.5% | $30,000 |
| 7 contributions · 5.1% | $20,500 |
| 5 contributions · 3.7% | $15,041 |
| 3 contributions · 1.9% | $7,500 |
| 6 contributions · 1.5% | $6,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% | $5,041 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 22 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 contributions · 7% of ranked | $28,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 32 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $21,862 |
| 6 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $21,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 26 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $19,080 |
| 4 contributions · 2% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $1,250 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($7,434) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $1,000 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $708,087
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 309 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $875 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 29 payments · 46% of all spending | $381,323 |
| 8 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $39,710 |
| 2 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $35,000 |
| 1 payment · 3.9% of all spending | $32,157 |
| 22 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $21,288 |
| 4 payments · 2% of all spending | $16,808 |
| 3 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $14,100 |
| 11 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $13,826 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 contributions · 12% of ranked | $49,348 |
| 29 contributions · 12% of ranked | $46,750 |
| 31 contributions · 8.9% of ranked | $35,541 |
| 18 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $35,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 24 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $18,330 |
| 15 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $13,041 |
| 6 contributions · 3% of ranked | $12,041 |
| 14 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $11,750 |
A further $1,250 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($7,434) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.