Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MS-03 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, MS-03
Has not served in Congress
3 priorities from michaelachiaradio.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Simply raising taxes or cutting spending does not solve our problems. We need better spending that invests in our people.
- Expand American factories, farms, and infrastructure
- Support industries that increase our global competitiveness
- Help more Americans fully participate in the economy
- Stabilize the national debt with sustainable production
- Focus on American communities, not special interests
America’s future depends on our federal government’s ability to invest in factories, farms, and infrastructure. We, as a nation, can and must produce more.
We also need to invest more in our consumer base by broadening the social safety net. An economy can only reach its maximum potential when its people have the financial security to participate fully and freely in the marketplace. For too long, public resources have been directed toward distant priorities and special interests while many Americans have been left behind.
Free markets will function best when we support them with timely public policy that helps strengthen our global competitive position.
By investing wisely in our consumers and in our productive capacities, we can put our economy back on sustainable footing over time and begin stabilizing our budget deficits and national debt in a way that will ensure economic stability for generations to come.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
We can ensure that American agriculture remains a cornerstone of our economy and a source of prosperity for generations to come.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
America’s growing need for quality healthcare gives the United States a chance to build assets that strengthen our healthcare industry.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
- Expand low-cost access to healthcare
- Reduce out-of-pocket costs and premiums
- Train more healthcare workers
- Invest in modern medical facilities
- Improve health outcomes and protect dignity in old age
Every American should have access to high quality preventive and curative healthcare at a low cost. But today, out-of-pocket expenses are an enormous financial risk and premium costs strain household budgets, thereby weakening our economy.
We must embrace the fact that, as more Americans live longer, there will be a growing need for spending on quality healthcare.
The key is to cultivate a workforce of American medical professionals and to develop long-term assets such as modern medical facilities and hospitals in the process.
These investments position America to be a global leader in healthcare delivery and they create high-quality jobs in communities across the country. Healthcare cost assistance is also one of the most effective ways to strengthen the social safety net and invest in the American consumer.
However, our main focus should always be to steadily improve health outcomes for our people and to ensure that every American can age with dignity, security, and access to the care they deserve.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
- Expand homebuilding
- Anchor rural growth with small businesses
- Increase asset ownership for Americans
- Invest in modern infrastructure
- Stabilize America’s macroeconomic trajectory
High housing costs have locked millions of Americans out of economic independence while many small towns have faded away. But addressing the forces behind these realities should not be treated as a social program, it should be seen as an opportunity for national growth and development.
If the United States is to compete in the decades ahead, we must make coordinated investments that expand our productive capacity and our communities at the same time.
By expanding USDA homebuilding programs, investing in modern infrastructure, and strengthening small producers across the agricultural value chain, we can build new towns, revitalize old ones, and create pathways to asset ownership for American families.
Together, these investments will create jobs, support businesses, and give our people the stable foundation they need to thrive. This is how we ensure the United States does not slowly decline like the great nations of the past but instead can stand in defiance against the crushing onslaught of time.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
- Improve national security and lower food inflation
- Support a more diverse mix of crops and livestock
- Lower capital barriers for small farmers
- Increase market share for small farms
- Refine production to better meet export demand
One of the most important ways we can protect America’s competitive position is to strengthen domestic food production. Many decades of inattentive policy have caused high food prices and created a more vulnerable supply chain.
Our policy should encourage farmers to grow a more diverse range of crops and livestock and allow access to value-added markets, which will unlock significant revenue opportunities. We can also provide favorable loans, qualified debt forgiveness, and expanded rental programs to help farms more easily access the specialized machinery they need to adapt in changing markets.
As profitable small farms gradually increase production nationwide, our existing large producers will use their economies of scale to stabilize food prices domestically and increase our exports.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
- Strengthen the grid through federal investment
- Upgrade aging infrastructure
- Prevent future blackouts and price spikes
- Protect against extreme weather and cyberattacks
- Create high-skill jobs in every region
A strong federal commitment to grid resilience is essential. America’s power grid is widely considered a national security risk due to its aging infrastructure, increasing electricity demands, and vulnerabilities to extreme weather.
Only the United States government has the scale, coordination, and resources to lead an effort of this magnitude. We must replace infrastructure that is decades past its designed lifespan and invest in modern transmission lines, storm-hardened equipment, and advanced cybersecurity systems that keep electricity flowing even in the face of disaster or attack.
By upgrading and securing our ability to reliably transmit energy from all sources, under any circumstances, we protect our people from outages and price shocks while also creating skilled jobs in construction, engineering, and technology.
A resilient energy grid is the foundation of economic stability and American strength.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
- Reverse policies that have increased division
- Protect critical industries from unfair competition
- Reduce the cost of trade to stabilize prices
- Cultivate America’s competitive advantages
- Attain peace through collaboration, not just strength
The strength of the United States lies in our ability to work together, both at home and with the world. Every country must protect its vital industries but maintaining cooperation between nations has never been more important.
For trade to work, the cost of exchanging must remain low. When barriers like tariffs are imposed, they disrupt this natural process by raising costs and reducing incentives to trade.
Tariffs also divert resources away from more productive uses, ultimately degrading our industrial and technological advantages. Highly effective trade policy should instead seek to achieve economic sustainability by focusing on our unique opportunities and strengths.
Real security ultimately doesn’t come from adversarial policies like tariffs and sanctions but instead from collaboration and mutual investment.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
- Improve foreign policy to reduce mass migration
- Build a sustainable, orderly immigration system
- Match new arrivals with existing infrastructure
- Maintain robust border security to protect communities
- Attract global talent
The United States can grow stronger through well-managed immigration but only if we first invest in the infrastructure to support it. Past failures in domestic and foreign policy have left our economy less prepared to handle growth, with insufficient housing, schools, and healthcare to support new arrivals.
Limited legal immigration can fuel business development, consumer spending, and innovation. But these benefits require a strong domestic foundation, which includes robust border security to protect our communities.
By pairing growth with planning, investment, and security, we can create a sustainable, orderly immigration system that strengthens our economy and ensures America remains the destination for the world’s best businesses and talent.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
- Maintain globally competitive tax rates
- Limit corporate loopholes
- Incentivize more Americans to own stock
- Use federal investment to grow production
- Avoid rapid tax increases
America needs a balanced tax plan that combines moderate ordinary income taxes with a corporate tax system that limits loopholes and remains competitive with other nations.
To help combat the excessive asset concentration that burdens our economy, our corporate tax plan should better incentivize companies to distribute cash to American citizens and, if tax rates increase, it should allow companies to avoid higher rates if they meet targets for broader stock ownership.
Material tax increases should be limited in the short term while the federal government commits significant investment to form industrial capital using debt. Our focus should be to increase real domestic production enough that it will more than offset the weakening purchasing power of our currency over time.
Importantly, our tax system is highly flexible, making it a valuable asset to the nation, but no tax system can outperform the society it serves. Our so-called merit-based system is really just a vast network of interdependence. We live better than any humans in recorded history, not solely due to individual merit but because we work together. No person transcends this fact.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
- Foster communication with China
- Compete aggressively yet cooperatively
- Promote peaceful compromise in Taiwan
- Avoid confrontational tactics
- Promote shared prosperity
Americans should not view the People’s Republic of China as an adversary. Instead, we must foster better communication, including military-to-military dialogues, and build a relationship rooted in mutual understanding and respect.
While fierce competition will likely define our relationship with China for decades, our approach should be to compete aggressively yet cooperatively. Rather than treating Taiwan as an asset of the United States, we should seek a workable compromise that protects the dignity of all parties involved.
Together, the United States and China can accomplish far more than we ever could apart, sustaining global leadership and shared prosperity for generations to come. We must advance not through confrontational tactics but by working in harmony with evolving economies around the world. Attempts to manipulate trade deals or isolate competitors will only harm us both in the long term.
When great nations unite with a shared mission of prosperity, we can ensure lasting peace and strengthen the bonds that connect us.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
Trust in our federal government has fallen to dangerously low levels, driven by partisanship and perceptions of corruption.
Restoring that trust is essential to a strong future for the United States.
Our courts must remain free from political pressure and dedicated to impartial justice. Judges should be appointed based on their commitment to judicial independence and public officials must reinforce this principle.
Just as our courts must be independent, an independent Federal Reserve allows the economy to be guided by economic realities rather than short-term political pressure.
Additionally, excessive lobbying has weakened the voice of ordinary Americans. We must impose meaningful limits on the influence of special interests.
That same principle applies to executive power. Emergency powers must be reviewed by Congress within a defined period, such as 90 days, and lawmaking must return to elected representatives rather than being shaped primarily by federal agencies.
By restoring trust in our government, we can put our people first and continue the work of forming a more perfect union.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
While most Americans picture a long-term unsheltered individual when they think of homelessness, the reality is that most people experience it temporarily due to a lost job or medical crisis.
For this reason, and for the overall health of our economy, the United States must expand rental and mortgage assistance nationwide. When families are no longer burdened by housing insecurity, more income will flow through local communities and create greater financial stability.
However, chronic homelessness also remains a persistent issue. For these individuals, stable housing must come first because the practical reality of their situation often traps them in addiction and makes it nearly impossible for them to hold a job.
The chronically homeless need a permanent residence that provides safety, for themselves and others, and the foundation needed to address mental health and addiction.
Homelessness is a solvable problem that can be addressed with coordinated investment. By making housing security a national priority, we can strengthen communities and build a more productive society.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
- Build trust and respect for police
- Limit unfairly stacked charges
- Ensure fair plea negotiations
- Expand mental health and addiction alternatives
- Support record clearing for reformed individuals
Although we have at times fallen short of our ideal as a nation of laws, where no one is above the law, we are committed to making improvements and creating a more effective justice system.
That begins with our police, who play a vital role in protecting communities. Building respect and trust between law enforcement and residents is essential. The federal government can support states with funding for accountability measures such as body-worn cameras and automated reporting systems to improve transparency and public confidence.
Justice must also be compassionate and proportional. Too often, low-income defendants are unfairly overcharged and pressured into unfavorable plea deals. Federal policy can combat these practices by setting enforceable limits on stacked charges and establishing oversight to ensure fair plea negotiations.
We must also expand mental health and addiction services as alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent offenders. Making it easier for reformed individuals to clear their records strengthens economic opportunity and community stability.
Together, these steps build a system that promotes liberty and justice for all.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · michaelachiaradio.com/issues
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00907386
82¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($185K of $224.4K). Cash on hand went from $5.6K on Sep 30, 2025 to $39.3K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $5,983 | $263 | $5,563 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $50,069 | $34,986 | $20,802 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 18, 2026 | $22,833 | $33,302 | $10,333 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $22,114 | $16,241 | $16,206 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $54,401 | $47,399 | $23,208 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $52,809 | $44,925 | $31,092 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $16,173 | $7,926 | $39,339 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
7 endorsers listed on Michael Chiaradio’s own campaign site: 5 officials, 1 union, 1 organization.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 0 votes (0%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 245 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $66.1K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The largest of the committees is listed. In all, 1 committee contribution was filed this cycle, totaling $5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $224,381
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
14% of the money placed by state came from inside Mississippi: $9.4K of $66.1K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 47 contributions · 15% | $9,635 |
| 50 contributions · 14% | $9,377 |
| 16 contributions · 12% | $8,250 |
| 10 contributions · 9.8% | $6,500 |
| 9 contributions · 7.3% | $4,850 |
| 3 contributions · 6.8% | $4,505 |
| 19 contributions · 6.6% | $4,350 |
| 7 contributions · 4.9% | $3,270 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 23 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 129 contributions · 38% of ranked | $25,094 |
| 10 contributions · 11% of ranked | $7,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 22 contributions · 8.5% of ranked | $5,602 |
| 6 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $3,350 |
| Written instead of an employer · 12 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $3,100 |
| 2 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $50 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($97,921) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $160 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $172,766
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 395 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 25 payments · 21% of all spending | $39,560 |
| 52 payments · 19% of all spending | $34,697 |
| 5 payments · 9% of all spending | $16,605 |
| 11 payments · 7.9% of all spending | $14,533 |
| 14 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $9,756 |
| 64 payments · 4% of all spending | $7,383 |
| 43 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $6,226 |
| 3 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $4,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 129 contributions · 38% of ranked | $25,094 |
| 15 contributions · 14% of ranked | $9,025 |
| 6 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $3,350 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 13 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $3,150 |
| 6 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $2,250 |
| 1 contribution · 3% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $1,500 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($97,921) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.