Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-27 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, CA-27
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
12 priorities from georgewhitesides.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
George went to Washington to make it work for working families in the Antelope Valley, Santa Clarita, and the San Fernando Valley — not just the wealthy and well-connected. He’s stood up for what’s right and pushed back when Washington gets it wrong. He’s fought to protect health coverage for seniors, children, and people with disabilities, keep food on the table for working families, invest in the research and innovation that creates good local jobs, and stand up against ICE’s abuse of power.
But when the Republican majority advanced a budget that would cut Medicaid for hundreds of thousands of Californians, reduce food assistance for families already stretched thin, defund the scientific research that drives our local aerospace economy, and dramatically increase funding for ICE, George voted no.
George believes that Washington should work for the people it represents. That’s why he sold his personal stock holdings after taking office to remove any potential conflicts of interest, and is leading the fight to root out corruption in Washington and ban congressional stock trading altogether.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
In his first year in Congress, George hit the ground running, helping pass legislation that will create thousands of new aerospace jobs in our area. George also advocated for greater support for our community colleges, working with Antelope Valley College and College of the Canyons to make sure students are prepared for the modern workforce and can grow their skills in the defense and tech economy.
As the CEO of Virgin Galactic, George helped create hundreds of good, mortgage-paying jobs in our area. He knows firsthand how to harness this district’s diverse strengths to cultivate a thriving economy that benefits residents and businesses alike. Together, George knows we can grow local jobs and reduce the hours commuting down to Los Angeles, implement accelerator programs to support the development of small and mid-sized businesses in the district, and prioritize infrastructure projects to enhance our region’s competitiveness and attract new businesses.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
We’re all feeling the effects of inflation and higher costs of living. George is fighting day in and day out to lower your healthcare, housing, gas, and grocery bills. George has spent his career solving problems and has reached across the aisle to work on getting housing and fire insurance costs under control, cut taxes for homeowners, lower health care and prescription drug costs, invest in an all-of-the above energy plan to reduce gas and energy prices, cut taxes for the middle class by expanding the SALT deduction, and protect Social Security and Medicare.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
Everyone should have the right to make their own healthcare decisions, including those related to reproductive health and abortion access, free from government interference. George is a cosponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would codify Roe v. Wade, and supports access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare services.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
George thinks that it is unacceptable that members of Congress can still trade individual stocks while in office – that’s why he is leading the charge to ban congressional stock trading. When he became a member of Congress, he was the first new member to get rid of any individual stock holdings, to remove even the potential for a conflict of interest. He is also working to ban government officials from betting on world events that they may have insider knowledge of, to make sure that elected officials are focused on representing their communities, not padding their own pockets.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
From his first day in office, George has been fighting to protect our communities from catastrophic wildfires. He’s led the charge on reducing fuels in wildland areas, increasing resources for firefighters on the frontlines, and utilizing new technologies to detect and track fires faster. He’s also working to make it easier for families to undertake fire-resistant home improvements.
As a co-founder of Megafire Action, the first policy organization dedicated to solving our nation’s megafire crisis, George is deeply committed to safeguarding our communities from catastrophic wildfires and addressing the home fire insurance crisis. George recognizes the urgent need for proactive measures to mitigate fire risks and protect homeowners while ensuring the stability of the insurance market. This entails investing in wildfire prevention and response efforts and giving our firefighters the tools and funding they need to carry out this critical work.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
George is grateful every day for the folks who work to protect our communities. In Congress, George has brought back millions in federal funding for local law enforcement, so they can invest in new technology and enhance public safety. By collaborating with local law enforcement agencies, community leaders, and stakeholders, we can develop tailored strategies that address the challenges facing the Antelope Valley, Santa Clarita, and the San Fernando Valley, and create safer neighborhoods for all residents.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
Our immigration system is broken. We need leaders in Congress who will put politics aside to actually fix the problem, not just play political games. That means finally securing our border with investments in advanced technology, hiring more border patrol agents and immigration judges, upgrading ports of entry, and building physical infrastructure where it makes sense. George has spent his career solving problems, and in Congress he will work with anyone – regardless of party – to improve border security and fix our immigration system in a way that strengthens our economy and is true to our history as a nation of immigrants.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
We need a transformational ‘Apollo-like’ housing program in America and in our district. We have to cut taxes for homeowners and crack down on predatory landlords, while ensuring that there’s enough housing in our district. George understands the importance of mixed-income neighborhoods and supports both public and private investment in affordable housing initiatives to ensure that individuals and families of all backgrounds have access to safe, stable, and affordable housing opportunities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
As the father of two ‘tweens,’ George recognizes the urgent need to address the crisis in teenage mental health that has been exacerbated by social media use. While technology has provided incredible opportunities for connection and communication, it has also introduced huge new challenges, including online safety risks, cyberbullying, and the proliferation of deepfake AI-generated imagery.
In Congress, George is working on a multi-faceted approach that combines innovation with responsible regulation. This includes investing in research to better understand the impact of social media on adolescent mental health, partnering with technology companies to develop and implement robust online safety measures, and promoting digital literacy programs in schools to empower students to navigate the online world safely and responsibly.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
George is committed to addressing the crisis situations at the Aliso Canyon natural gas storage facility and the Chiquita Canyon landfill. These environmental hazards pose significant risks to public health, air quality, and the surrounding ecosystems. George supports immediate measures to reduce emissions, and believes in fostering sustainable waste management solutions.
George introduced a bill to provide tax relief to those impacted by Chiquita Canyon, and has repeatedly pushed the EPA to investigate and hold the landfill accountable for the health hazards they have caused.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
In Congress, George has prioritized policies that spur innovation and support small businesses and local innovators. George is advocating to provide tax incentives and grants to small businesses and startups, fostering an environment that encourages entrepreneurship and creativity. Additionally, George is pushing for increased investment in research and development across various industries to drive technological advancements and economic growth. George supports responsible cryptocurrency regulations that protect consumers while fostering innovation and competition in the digital asset space, and establish a framework to support American leadership in this growing sector. This includes measures to ensure transparency and promote the development of blockchain technologies that benefit society as a whole. By creating a supportive and forward-thinking regulatory framework, we can unleash the potential of American innovation and continue to lead in the global economy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · georgewhitesides.com/policies
93% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 43 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Armed Services
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Whitesides’ 26 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00834028
59¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($2.7M of $4.5M). Cash on hand went from $866.6K on Mar 31, 2025 to $2.2M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $758,846 | $218,969 | $866,611 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $882,080 | $293,940 | $1,454,751 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $811,635 | $198,563 | $2,067,823 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $514,936 | $269,315 | $2,313,444 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $421,155 | $239,880 | $2,494,719 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $147,502 | $320,654 | $2,321,567 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $427,376 | $194,026 | $2,554,917 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $476,257 | $762,279 | $2,268,895 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $72,910 | $168,147 | $2,173,658 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
64 endorsers listed on George Whitesides’ own campaign site: 2 parties, 31 officials, 12 unions, 19 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
United States Senator
United States Senator
United States Senator
Speaker Emerita
House Democratic Whip
House Democratic Caucus Chair
California Congressional Delegation Chair
California’s 24th Congressional District
Advanced · 62,214 votes (41%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Won · 139,294 votes (57%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 5,277 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.5M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 422 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $736.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 11 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 26 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $444.1K.
Total reported receipts $4,512,697
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
54% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $1.3M of $2.5M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,802 contributions · 54% | $1,339,054 |
| 237 contributions · 11% | $277,309 |
| 268 contributions · 8.1% | $201,192 |
| 66 contributions · 2.9% | $71,956 |
| 65 contributions · 2.7% | $68,041 |
| 46 contributions · 2.7% | $67,208 |
| 79 contributions · 2.6% | $65,700 |
| 90 contributions · 2.6% | $63,725 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 39 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 3,011 contributions · 39% of ranked | $845,379 |
| Written instead of an employer · 560 contributions · 13% of ranked | $279,689 |
| 91 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $16,200 |
| 4 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 13 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $12,250 |
| 3 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $10,500 |
A further $50,987 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($415,253) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $57,837 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,805,992
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,569 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
76 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $260,101 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 109 payments · 12% of all spending | $310,870 |
| 72 payments · 10% of all spending | $274,536 |
| 4 payments · 7.8% of all spending | $207,000 |
| 56 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $143,322 |
| 14 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $136,879 |
| 206 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $88,657 |
| 16 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $75,630 |
| 6 payments · 2% of all spending | $53,285 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,656 contributions · 27% of ranked | $646,159 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 351 contributions · 8% of ranked | $193,170 |
| 97 contributions · 7.7% of ranked | $187,003 |
| 167 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $159,624 |
| 40 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $55,668 |
| 20 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $51,650 |
| 22 contributions · 2% of ranked | $48,955 |
| 39 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $44,480 |
A further $50,987 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($415,253) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.