Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TX-18 race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. House, TX-18Texas
Representative since 2005
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Al Green’s words are not shown
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 13 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Financial Services
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Green’s 140 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00578567
$1.10 has been spent for every dollar raised across 9 reports ($1.9M of $1.7M). Cash on hand went from $459.1K on Mar 31, 2025 to $46.4K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $359,165 | $119,169 | $459,081 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $78,306 | $28,055 | $509,332 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $144,674 | $81,369 | $572,637 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $146,668 | $191,742 | $527,563 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $211,343 | $200,116 | $538,790 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $244,544 | $518,763 | $264,570 |
| PRE-RUN-OFF 2026 through May 6, 2026 | $326,115 | $264,851 | $325,834 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $214,957 | $456,040 | $84,751 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $4,630 | $42,973 | $46,408 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Lost · 42,009 votes (44%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Lost · 15,001 votes (31%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Primary March 3, 2026 · runoff May 26, 2026 · 2 polls
Each dot is a poll. A line is drawn from the third nonpartisan poll; there are 2 so far. How polls are read
Christian Menefee won by 1.8 points. No poll naming both Christian Menefee and Al Green ended in the 21 days before the vote.
| Poll | Christian Menefee | Al Green | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | 46.0% | 44.2% | Christian Menefee +1.8 |
March 3, 2026 · Result (unofficial)
Christian Menefee won by 38.7 points. The final poll had Christian Menefee +7, understating Christian Menefee's margin by 31.7 points.
| Poll | Christian Menefee | Al Green | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Houston Hobby School of Public Affairsended May 8 | 50% | 43% | Christian Menefee +7 | −31.7 |
| Median of the final polls | Christian Menefee +7 | −31.7 | ||
| Result | 69.4% | 30.6% | Christian Menefee +38.7 |
May 26, 2026 · Result (unofficial) · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote and after the first round, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated October 28, 2026 · 2 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 926 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $897.4K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Sep 30, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 25 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $72.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 1 transfer was filed this cycle, totaling $3.1K.
Total reported receipts $1,730,401
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
79% of the money placed by state came from inside Texas: $706.1K of $897.4K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 564 contributions · 79% | $706,091 |
| 122 contributions · 6% | $54,285 |
| 19 contributions · 1.6% | $14,310 |
| 23 contributions · 1.5% | $13,230 |
| 33 contributions · 1.3% | $11,970 |
| 15 contributions · 1.3% | $11,800 |
| 8 contributions · 1.1% | $9,650 |
| 13 contributions · 1% | $9,375 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 35 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 270 contributions · 19% of ranked | $145,155 |
| Written instead of an employer · 120 contributions · 19% of ranked | $141,796 |
| 9 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $11,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $11,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1% of ranked | $7,500 |
A further $97,963 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($316,584) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $76,022 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,734,532
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 622 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
2 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $541 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 16 payments · 16% of all spending | $304,400 |
| 14 payments · 15% of all spending | $289,941 |
| 8 payments · 6.4% of all spending | $121,937 |
| 5 payments · 6.4% of all spending | $121,700 |
| 1 payment · 3.8% of all spending | $71,875 |
| 8 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $51,036 |
| 8 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $50,643 |
| 4 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $45,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 94 contributions · 16% of ranked | $125,975 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 230 contributions · 14% of ranked | $113,105 |
| 53 contributions · 6% of ranked | $48,210 |
| 24 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $40,850 |
| 19 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $38,275 |
| 17 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $27,600 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 36 contributions · 3% of ranked | $23,950 |
| 10 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $21,000 |
A further $94,463 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($316,584) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.