Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › VA-10 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, VA-10
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
8 priorities from suhasforvirginia.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Suhas is a small business owner and he understands that small businesses are the backbone of our economy. Virginia's 10th Congressional District is home to tens of thousands of federal civil servants and contractors, and Suhas will protect those jobs so that our community can continue to thrive.
In the Virginia General Assembly, State Senator Subramanyam has successfully passed legislation that brought down rising costs. For example:
- HB 528: Refunded over $300 Million to Virginia ratepayers in overcharges by the electric utility corporation (Chief Patron)
- HB 1832: Prevented a 40% toll hike on the Dulles Greenway Toll Road (Chief Patron)
- HB 2007: Requires transparency in drug pricing (Chief Co-Patron)
In Congress, Suhas will continue to deliver real results to grow our economy and create jobs. He supports manufacturing in the United States, investing in America's infrastructure, and continuing to strengthen the middle class.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suhasforvirginia.com/issues
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs was a devastating blow to women across the country and their ability to make their own health care decisions. In light of this, Suhas believes that Congress must prioritize making sure everyone, no matter their zip code, has access to affordable, reliable, and safe reproductive health care.
In the Virginia legislature, Suhas sponsored a constitutional amendment that would protect reproductive freedom in Virginia, and fought to protect women's health choices . He will always support the right to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and a woman’s bodily autonomy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suhasforvirginia.com/issues
Suhas and his wife have two young daughters who go to school in our community. Their school has armed security and bulletproof windows, and kids across our community do active shooter drills. This reality shouldn’t be our new normal.
In the legislature, Suhas has actively supported common sense gun safety laws, and he proudly pushed several measures which passed the General Assembly just this year, two of which were signed by a Republican Governor.
Suhas believes we can achieve serious progress on this issue while respecting the Second Amendment, and without undermining the rights of responsible gun owners.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suhasforvirginia.com/issues
Ashburn, VA – Today, Senator Suhas Subramanyam, Obama White House Alumnus and Candidate for Virginia’s 10th Congressional District, responded to Governor Youngkin’s signing and vetoes of critical gun violence prevention bills that he was the Patron or Chief Co-Patron on in the Senate.
“Passing common sense gun violence prevention measures will make people safer and save lives across the Commonwealth,” said Senator Subramanyam. “I want my two girls to live in a future where they feel safe in their schools instead of needing armed security, active shooter drills, and bulletproof windows.”
“While I’m glad we got some critical reforms signed in to law, we must do better. I am not giving up on passing common sense legislation to protect families like ours in the future. I am used to taking on tough fights, and will continue to stand up to anyone who gets in the way of making a positive difference for Virginia families.”
Three of Subramanyam’s critical bills were vetoed:
- Chief Patron for SB 273 - establishes a five-day waiting period for firearm purchases
- Chief Co-Patron for SB 2 - prohibits importation, sale, manufacture, or purchase of automatic weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices
- Chief Co-Patron for SB 99 - prohibits automatic weapons from being carried in public
Two of Subramanyam’s bills were signed in to law:
- Chief Co-Patron for SB 100 - prohibits manufacturing undetectable firearms (signed in to law with amendments)
- Chief Co-Patron for SB 210 - prohibits sale of devices to make weapons automatic
Subramanyam is the primary author of SB 273, which would establish a 5 day firearm purchase waiting period for any gun purchased in the Commonwealth of Virginia, intended to disrupt impulsive self-harm or acts of violence. Subramanyam’s bill passed the Senate a day after activist David Hogg visited the Virginia legislature to promote gun violence prevention.
Firearm purchase waiting periods are a top priority of several leading gun violence prevention organizations, including Everytown, Giffords, Moms Demand Action, and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Firearm purchase waiting periods are opposed by the National Rifle Association.
Senator Subramanyam is committed to breaking the stronghold the NRA and gun manufacturers have had over elected officials, instead siding with the majority of Virginians who want sensible gun control reforms that protect our communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suhasforvirginia.com/press-and-media/key-gun-violence-prevention-bills-from-senator-subramanyam-vetoed-by-gun-lobby-backed-governor
Suhas believes we are facing a climate emergency that poses a grave threat to the future of our planet. Experts report that natural disasters have cost the United States more than $450 billion over the past three years, and are projected to cost $54 trillion globally by 2040. Those numbers fail to convey the devastation from lives lost, and the impacts on communities displaced by increasing climate crises. Suhas cannot imagine leaving his daughters with a world that is less habitable and more unstable because of a problem that we have the resources and knowledge to tackle now.
As a Senator and Delegate, he has advanced a bold agenda to promote the environment and conservation, all while creating jobs and promoting economic opportunity for small businesses.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suhasforvirginia.com/issues
With the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, our democracy has suffered under the weight of unlimited corporate influence in our politics. Suhas proudly signed the Big Money Out VA pledge to limit the influence of corporate money in our politics.
Suhas will continue to advocate for campaign finance reform. He also supports preventing Members of Congress from trading individual stocks and will be a strong advocate for preventing corruption in politics.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suhasforvirginia.com/issues
Suhas believes that our democracy is under attack. From the events on January 6th, 2021, which threatened to stop the certification of our presidential election, to attacks on the right to vote, it is more critical than ever to safeguard our fragile democratic institutions.
Suhas and his family made America their home because of the strength of our pluralistic democracy. As extremists work to erode American democracy, he is adamant that we must do all we can to protect our nation’s fundamental ideal that we have a voice in our government.
He will continue to fight against restrictive voter ID laws that are designed to suppress the vote, protect early voting to ensure greater access to the polls, and combat political gerrymandering so that voters choose who represents them, not the other way around.
He will also support legislation to reform our campaign finance laws to ensure middle-class families are not drowned out by money that corrupts our elections.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suhasforvirginia.com/issues
Suhas believes that we lower the cost of health care and expand access to those who can't afford it. He fought for transparency in prescription drug pricing and won, and he will continue to support the ability of Medicare to negotiate drug prices. Suhas will stand up to Big Pharma and work to end the chronic disease epidemic.
We also need to recognize the urgency of the mental health crisis and work together to pass meaningful legislation to help the most vulnerable among us. In Congress, I will take steps to expand access to mental health care providers and advocate for increasing research into preventative steps for our communities to support their neighbors.
As our loved ones get older, we also need to confront the issue of rising home-based, long-term care. Middle-class families should not have to exhaust their savings to provide care for elderly, sick, or disabled loved ones.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suhasforvirginia.com/issues
For more than a hundred years, America has been at the forefront of technological change. These emerging fields bring great opportunities, but without proper regulation, they can bring significant risk. We need an approach that allows American innovation to flourish, but protects consumers and business and makes clear what the rules are. Emerging technologies also have significant implications for national security, and policy makers need to be cognizant of these implications.
Blockchain technology solves an important problem in the digital and physical economy: trust. An immutable public ledger has already shown itself to be a valuable technology in areas ranging from shipping around the world all the way down to a new way of doing finance. Congress must take the lead in pushing forward responsible and stable regulation of blockchain technologies to allow this technology to flourish.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) – AI has the potential to fuel our economic growth for the coming decades but also presents a host of potential downsides, from classroom cheating all the way up to job loss and significant economic and political disruption. It is important that Congress and regulators create an environment that allows for innovation to flourish while also having clear rules for the road and ensuring strong consumer protections to prevent this technology from being abused.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suhasforvirginia.com/issues
96% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 25 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Subramanyam’s 48 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00856963
62¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.1M of $1.7M). Cash on hand went from $133.3K on Mar 31, 2025 to $746K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $119,563 | $77,130 | $133,266 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $159,939 | $89,959 | $203,246 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $191,705 | $97,074 | $297,876 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $271,388 | $106,831 | $462,433 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $249,284 | $105,151 | $606,566 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $161,347 | $158,649 | $609,264 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $17,219 | $43,671 | $582,812 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $399,985 | $335,831 | $646,966 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $137,373 | $38,306 | $746,033 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
5 endorsers listed on Suhas Subramanyam’s own campaign site: 4 officials, 1 organization.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
former VA-10 Representative
“In Congress, Congressman Subramanyam has hit the ground running to deliver results for Virginians. He has championed legislation to address the affordability crisis in the Commonwealth — including the high costs of housing, healthcare, and child care — and has stood up for federal workers in the face of the President’s attacks. I look forward to working with Suhas to improve the lives of all Virginians, and I am proud to endorse his re-election campaign,” Governor Spanberger said. Rep. Subramanyam said, “I am honored to receive Governor Abigail Spanberger’s endorsement. In the coming months, our campaign will reach out to Virginia voters to share our vision for the future–lowering costs, protecting federal workers, and holding President Trump accountable. I am excited to work with the Governor to do just that.”
“Former Rep. Jennifer Wexton said, “I’m excited to endorse Suhas in his re-election campaign. Suhas has been working nonstop for our district, delivering millions of dollars back to constituents and funding important local community projects. He has done an exceptional job assisting constituents in times of need and uplifting their voices. I know he will continue to do a great job when Democrats win a majority in the next Congress.” Wexton flipped the 10th Congressional District from red to blue in 2018 and served in Congress until 2025.”
“Americans are being squeezed by a broken system where corruption drives up costs and puts special interests ahead of working families,” said Brian Lemek, Executive Director of Defend The Vote. “Suhas understands that rooting out corruption and making our democracy work for the people is key to lowering costs. He is leading the fight to take on special interests and deliver real results. We’re proud to support him.” Rep. Subramanyam said, “In Congress, I have fought against attacks on our democracy, combated corruption and demanded increased government transparency and accountability. I will continue to protect our democracy and appreciate the support from Defend the Vote.”
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,044 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $689.2K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 215 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $435.9K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 2 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $50.4K.
Total reported receipts $1,707,804
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
61% of the money placed by state came from inside Virginia: $419.7K of $685.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 787 contributions · 61% | $419,691 |
| 62 contributions · 8.7% | $59,469 |
| 37 contributions · 5.7% | $39,352 |
| 31 contributions · 5.4% | $37,253 |
| 23 contributions · 4.5% | $30,650 |
| 32 contributions · 4.1% | $28,185 |
| 22 contributions · 3% | $20,800 |
| 11 contributions · 1.9% | $13,050 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 24 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 421 contributions · 25% of ranked | $160,762 |
| Written instead of an employer · 61 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $50,288 |
| Written instead of an employer · 27 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $14,992 |
| 4 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $9,854 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $16,912 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($123,103) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $8,594 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $685,716
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 702 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $136 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 17 payments · 8.3% of all spending | $87,500 |
| 35 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $76,553 |
| 31 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $58,368 |
| 78 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $56,729 |
| 17 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $40,087 |
| 2 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $32,210 |
| 18 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $28,677 |
| 9 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $27,696 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 446 contributions · 25% of ranked | $170,697 |
| 34 contributions · 6% of ranked | $41,301 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 23 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $39,051 |
| 22 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $32,050 |
| 30 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $31,354 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 33 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $18,592 |
| 17 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $15,135 |
| 5 contributions · 2% of ranked | $14,000 |
A further $3,477 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($123,103) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.