Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › AL-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, AL-04
Representative since 1997
10 priorities from aderholtforcongress.org, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
I support expanding job opportunities into all areas of Alabama’s 4th District through low taxes, reduced regulation, common-sense trade policies and strong immigration standards.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org
Heading as listed on aderholtforcongress.org ↗ (opens aderholtforcongress.org at this heading)
With House Democrats just a few seats away from control of the U.S. House, it's ever important for solid, conservative leaders like me to hold the line against the radical left social and economic agenda.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org
Heading as listed on aderholtforcongress.org ↗ (opens aderholtforcongress.org at this heading)
I have always been a staunch pro-lifer, conservative, and fighter against the liberal’s cultural agenda. I'm proud to champion religious freedom, both at home and around the globe.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org
Heading as listed on aderholtforcongress.org ↗ (opens aderholtforcongress.org at this heading)
Robert's number one priority is rebuilding America's economy.
Over the past several years, there has been tremendous growth within the 4th District and across North Alabama. Robert is proud of the progress made in Alabama’s aerospace and defense, agriculture, and manufacturing industries -- but his work isn't finished yet.
He believes that every American deserves the opportunity to live out the American Dream. That's what he's fighting for. He is working to cut taxes even more, slash regulation, and bring jobs back to our shores. He is a strong advocate for making sure America is not dependent on importing any critical materials or products from China, Russia or other unfriendly nations.
Robert believes we need common sense energy solutions - not socialist Green New Deal policies.
Robert believes we need to expand America’s energy exploration and open the Keystone Pipeline to produce more oil and gas and reduce energy prices.
He also believes we need to support small businesses across the 4th District. He supports expanding broadband to rural areas so small businesses can compete more effectively.
He has worked to encourage companies to relocate to North Alabama to provide good jobs with good wages.
Here are some other ways Robert is fighting to rebuild our economy:
- Fought against President Biden’s Build Back Better bill - a package of socialist economic provisions that would have weakened America’s economy.
- Voted to cut taxes and slashed regulations to bring back American jobs
- Helped secure a $2 million investment to build a technical education center in Cullman, Alabama
- Worked to secure needed infrastructure projects
- Supported a bill signed by President Trump that increased the personal tax exemption by 200%
- Fought for tax cuts that kept more money in the pockets of 4 out of 5 people in his District
- Endorsed by the Business Council of Alabama
- Created the Buy America program to strengthen our steel industry and plans to expand this important program to include pharmaceuticals thus reducing our reliance on China for medical production
- Supporting American manufacturers to both decrease our dependence on foreign suppliers and increase the competitiveness of our domestic industries
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org/issues
Robert is advancing American leadership around the world.
He plays a key role in guiding and leading our government’s investment in cutting-edge technology. He’s proud to represent North Alabama when negotiating strategic investments and planning defense budgets. Robert also leads the charge to ensure our country has the most sophisticated technology at its disposal to protect the homeland. His leadership in advancing our cyber defenses, underscoring the importance of space exploration, and modernizing our military capabilities is critical to America’s global leadership.
Robert is also proud to represent communities on the cutting edge of American innovation. North Alabama hosts industry leaders in aerospace, defense contracting, rocket engines, manufacturing, and beyond -- all of which contribute to American strength.
Here are some of the ways Robert is building on America’s leadership:
- Authored the first funding for hypersonic missiles
- Worked and voted to secure an additional $25 billion to bolster our defense budget and is advocating for significant increases in coming years
- Cosponsored legislation to require the U.S. to ban import of Russian oil and gas
- Believes America should ramp up its energy exploration and production to make us energy independent
- Cosponsored legislation to require the Administration to procure essential materials from U.S.
- Fought against Biden’s effort to require women to register for a potential draft.
- Supported the creation of Space Force to ensure the US maintains superiority in space defense
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org/issues
Robert is protecting your Second Amendment rights.
Robert believes in our Constitutional right to bear arms. He wants you to be able to protect your life, your family and your property. While the far-Left is threatening to confiscate firearms, expand gun control legislation and limit our rights, he won't give in. The Second Amendment protects the American people from government overreach and tyranny -- that must not be diminished.
Throughout his time in Congress, Robert has opposed several attempts to limit our rights -- including by President Obama when he used an executive order to force down gun control measures. On the other hand, Robert has received high grades and endorsements from America's leading gun rights groups. He believes responsible gun ownership is paramount to preserving our freedom.
Here are a few ways Robert is protecting the Second Amendment:
- Supported the expansion of gun freedoms relating to the right to carry
- Endorsed by and received an “A” rating from the National Rifle Association (NRA)
- Supports judges who uphold the Second Amendment
- Given top marks by Gun Owners of America
- Received 100% rating from the National Shooting Sports Foundation
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org/issues
Robert stands with our brave men and women in law enforcement.
Robert proudly supports the courageous police officers serving across America. While the far-Left degrades their hard work and threatens to defund them, Robert is committed to defending them.
Robert believes defunding police departments is counterproductive and makes our streets more dangerous. Instead, he believes there are effective, commonsense solutions to make policing safer and better for everyone. These include building on current training and hiring programs, improving de-escalation protocols, and reforming data collection processes.
The bottom line is this: high-crime areas need more law enforcement presence, not less; defunded police departments would make our streets more dangerous, not less; and the brave men and women who keep us safe deserve more respect, not less.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org/issues
Robert is fighting to hold Russia and China accountable and bring jobs back to America.
Robert is fighting to hold Russia and China accountable. Russia for its invasion of its peaceful neighbor, Ukraine. China for its support of Russia and its threats to our allies and friendly nations in Asia.
Robert condemns Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and supported an additional $10 billion in arms and material to support Ukraine’s resistance. He also cosponsored and voted to stop all US purchases of Russian oil and gas. He supports increased sanctions on Russian and it’s government officials and prominent individuals connected to Putin’s leadership. He believes in strengthening NATO by requiring all NATO members to increase their defense budgets to a minimum of 2% of their GDP. Robert stands with Eastern European allies like Poland, Romania, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia and supports increased US forces in those nations to deter Russian aggression.
Robert believes America needs to rely less on China for any essential military, medical or security needs. He also has called for increased enforcement against China’s theft of our intellectual property. He also believes America needs to expand our manufacturing base in order to reduce imports from China. He has also condemned China’s human rights violations against Christians and other religious minorities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org/issues
Robert is Northern Alabama’s top advocate for rural broadband expansion.
Robert is working to make Alabama’s 4th Congressional Districts the number one rural broadband district in America. Robert created the ReConnect programs that procured hundred of millions of dollars for funding for rural broadband. He ensured the Trump Administration included broadband funding in COVID relief packages (and that continued in the Biden relief packages)
Robert is working with local broadband providers as well as national companies to make rural broadband a priority, and tens of thousands of homes have been wired with high-speed internet in the 4th District in the last few years.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org/issues
Robert is one of the leading Pro-Life Members of Congress.
Robert has spent over a decade protecting the most vulnerable among us, and he has led efforts to defend life and elevate abortion alternatives. Robert believes that every life is a gift from God and should be celebrated, which is why he has participated in the March for Life, supported a ban on federal health coverage that includes abortion procedures, and fought against using taxpayer dollars to fund abortions both at home and abroad. He has also used his important committee assignments to push for FDA protections for embryos and Pro-Life regulatory efforts. He will not rest until our country is free of abortion practices.
Here are some of the achievements Robert has earned for his Pro-Life work:
- ‘A’ rating on National Pro-Life Scorecard by the Susan B. Anthony List
- Endorsed and rated 100% by the National Right to Life Committee - the nation’s leading Pro-Life organization
- Serves as the Chair of the House Values Action Team
- Serves as the Co-Chair of the Congressional Adoption Caucus
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aderholtforcongress.org/issues
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 12 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Aderholt’s 22 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00313247
$1.20 has been spent for every dollar raised across 9 reports ($1.5M of $1.2M). Cash on hand went from $939.5K on Mar 31, 2025 to $719.7K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $87,869 | $115,288 | $939,477 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $153,010 | $114,246 | $978,240 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $272,553 | $203,018 | $1,047,775 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $113,972 | $100,027 | $1,061,720 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $176,231 | $399,288 | $838,663 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $28,635 | $90,823 | $776,475 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $190,396 | $217,210 | $749,660 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $207,561 | $179,156 | $778,065 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $8,361 | $66,714 | $719,712 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
1 endorser listed on Robert B. Aderholt’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 72,117 votes (78%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Won · 251,320 votes (80%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 412 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $508.4K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 285 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $582.8K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 2 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $23.2K.
Total reported receipts $1,238,586
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
71% of the money placed by state came from inside Alabama: $362.4K of $507.9K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 274 contributions · 71% | $362,405 |
| 41 contributions · 10% | $52,500 |
| 16 contributions · 2.5% | $12,806 |
| 6 contributions · 2.5% | $12,500 |
| 11 contributions · 2.4% | $12,320 |
| 13 contributions · 1.9% | $9,500 |
| 16 contributions · 1.7% | $8,810 |
| 4 contributions · 1.1% | $5,750 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 26 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 60 contributions · 8.8% of ranked | $42,525 |
| Written instead of an employer · 24 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $32,580 |
| 6 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $13,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 8 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $11,120 |
| 6 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $10,060 |
| 4 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $16,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($16,679) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
No outside spending filed
The campaign also refunded $19,628 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,252,748
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 741 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
41 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $235,583 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 19% of all spending | $277,000 |
| 19 payments · 16% of all spending | $235,899 |
| 4 payments · 9.6% of all spending | $142,367 |
| 3 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $82,162 |
| 19 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $47,600 |
| 9 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $41,167 |
| 4 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $40,004 |
| 3 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $30,808 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 29 contributions · 13% of ranked | $63,300 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 60 contributions · 8.6% of ranked | $42,525 |
| 30 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $38,260 |
| 24 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $29,060 |
| 13 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $25,720 |
| 18 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $18,000 |
| 7 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $14,450 |
| 10 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $11,990 |
A further $16,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($16,679) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.