Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › WA-06 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, WA-06
Representative since 2025
6 priorities from electemilyrandall.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
We must make a just and fair transition away from fossil fuels and invest in clean energy jobs and infrastructure.
The United States has a responsibility to be a leader and innovate new ways for countries to accelerate their transitions to a more green and clean economy.
I will work closely with labor and industry to find ways for workers to gain new skills and transition to the jobs that our changing economy and environment needs. I am committed to building an economy that is sustainable, and that protects those among us most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. We must focus on renewable energy, and climate-neutral industry that protects not only today’s economy, but the ability for our grandchildren to live and work as well.
We know that the communities that will be most impacted by climate change are the ones with the least means to survive it. This is why I have been a leader in ensuring a just transition to a greener transportation system and adapting our electrical grid to the needs of a greener economy.
In Congress, I will build on my success in Washington State and expand these advancements across the country.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electemilyrandall.com/issues/fighting-climate-change
I believe in an economy that works from the middle class out–not trickle down–putting working families at the center of economic policies. I believe in equal pay for equal work, a tax structure that requires big business to pay its fair share, and in creating good jobs by investing in small and mid-sized businesses. I believe in the importance of driving technological innovation and economic growth, including through blockchain technology and the digital asset industry. I believe in removing the barriers to economic freedom and opportunity for our most marginalized communities such as communities of color, LGBTQ folks, and the disability community.
In our country today, there is too much wealth in too few hands. We can build a better future for all of us by strengthening the middle class, by giving folks the opportunity to earn a good wage and benefits, keep their lights on and food on their table, and have money in their pockets. We can create more jobs and grow our economy through comprehensive regulatory frameworks that encourage innovation while protecting consumers.
In Congress, I will work across the aisle to make sure that working class families like mine are able to earn a decent living where we can put food on the table, pay our bills, and breathe a little easier toward the end of the month.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electemilyrandall.com/issues/lowering-costs-for-families
We are at a critical moment for our democracy, and protecting the right to vote for Americans is crucial. This starts with ensuring that all eligible voters have access to the ballot box. I will continue to fight to remove barriers to voting and ensure every citizen’s voice is heard.
Washington’s 6th District deserves a champion who will work as hard for them, as they work for their families. For too long, too many in Congress have placed partisan politics and corporate special interests above The People and that needs to end.
As a member of Congress, I will be dedicated to lifting up the voices of Americans–not special interests. I am a part of the community I am running to represent–I see my constituents at the grocery store, and one thing that I consistently hear is that they appreciate the stand I’ve taken against taking corporate PAC money since I started running for office. They know where I stand, and it’s with them, not corporate special interests.
In Congress, I will continue to fight hard to safeguard and defend the right to vote for all eligible voters, and to ensure that those who are most impacted by legislation have a say in that legislation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electemilyrandall.com/issues/defending-democracy
No one should go bankrupt to pay for lifesaving or palliative care. My family was only able to afford critical care for my younger sister when she was with us because, in addition to my dad’s government employee health insurance, Olivia qualified for Medicaid. I want to ensure that every family has these same opportunities for their loved ones. As a member of Congress, I will work hard to protect and strengthen the ACA, increase the flexibility of Medicaid dollars so that states like Washington can continue expanding coverage, bring down the out of pocket cost on medication, and invest in staffing critical healthcare positions and infrastructure so people have more than just theoretical access to the care they need.
I have been a leader in Washington in expanding access to healthcare providers and ensuring that people have more than just theoretical access to essential healthcare including comprehensive reproductive healthcare and gender affirming care.
I know firsthand just how devastating healthcare costs can be to working class families and no one should go bankrupt to pay for lifesaving or palliative care which is why I sponsored the legislation creating Washington’s Universal Healthcare Commission.
In Congress, I will fight to ensure healthcare, including mental health care and reproductive healthcare, is affordable, accessible, and culturally-relevant for patients.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electemilyrandall.com/issues/enhancing-healthcare
After graduating from my local high school, I became the first in my family to graduate from college — I understand and believe in the value of quality education to level the playing field. As the Senate Chair of the Higher Education and Workforce Development Committee, I have focused on opening doors wider for all students, and ensuring that whichever path a student chooses is well supported. We’ve made Washington State one of the most affordable states in which to go to college, while also strengthening our apprenticeship and career training system. I’ve also passed policies that help increase diversity in medical school admissions, ensure patients receive affordable and culturally competent care, and worked to expand the Latino Centers for Health at University of Washington.
I believe in equal access to good schools and well-compensated teachers no matter our zip-code or family background. Every student deserves a quality education from pre-K to post-high school. And that post-high school path might be college and it might be an apprenticeship, but it should prepare students for tomorrow’s job market without saddling them with insurmountable debt.
In Congress, I will support efforts to make all educational pathways affordable and accessible to all students.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electemilyrandall.com/issues/improving-education
From passing Reproductive Health Access for All in 2019, to working to ensure student health plans covered abortion care, to ending cost sharing, to preserving access to mifepristone, I have been a leader on reproductive health policy in Washington – and have worked in coalition with reproductive justice partners. I will continue that work – as a coalition builder and a policy maker – in DC.
In Washington state, I have been one of the top abortion rights and reproductive rights advocates. I have sponsored legislation to block religious hospital mergers that lead to reduced reproductive healthcare and gender affirming care access; extend postpartum healthcare coverage support birthing parents for a full year after giving birth; expand the types of healthcare professionals who can perform abortions require all health plans to cover reproductive healthcare and contraception; and many other pieces of legislation expanding access to healthcare generally and reproductive freedom specifically.
I work closely with reproductive care providers and advocates to find more ways to expand and protect access to this essential aspect of basic healthcare – including regulating CPCs/fake clinics in 2024! I am proud to have a 100% lifetime pro-choice voting record.
In Congress, 6th District voters can be sure that I will fight as hard for abortion rights as I do in Washington State.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electemilyrandall.com/issues/abortion
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 14 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Natural Resources
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Randall’s 14 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00857094
90¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.3M of $1.4M). Cash on hand went from $152K on Mar 31, 2025 to $168.7K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $170,013 | $45,858 | $152,027 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $203,182 | $227,211 | $127,998 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $199,543 | $137,929 | $189,612 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $183,484 | $180,553 | $192,543 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $191,963 | $181,306 | $203,200 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $227,236 | $196,697 | $233,739 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $19,826 | $11,933 | $241,631 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $199,132 | $231,199 | $209,564 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $28,388 | $69,287 | $168,665 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
19 endorsers listed on Emily Randall’s own campaign site: 4 parties, 1 official, 4 unions, 10 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Planned Parenthood Action Fund
“Earning the endorsement of Planned Parenthood Action Fund in this congressional campaign means so much to me,” said Randall. “My political career began at Planned Parenthood – and as a legislator I have partnered with Planned Parenthood in my work to strengthen abortion access in Washington state. Planned Parenthood Action Fund knows that we need reproductive champions in Congress to fight for our right to make our own decisions about our bodies, our families, and our futures. “Planned Parenthood Action Fund is committed to helping elect reproductive health care champions, and we know that Emily Randall will be that champion for Washington’s 6th Congressional District,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Action Fund. “As a truly effective advocate for health care access, Emily will bring the same tenacity to Washington, DC that we have seen from her as a legislator in Washington state. We are excited to support her campaign to join Washington state’s Congressional delegation.”
Advanced · 132,805 votes (59%) · 1 of 5 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3,403 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $555.8K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 178 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $395.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 1 transfer was filed this cycle, totaling $1.6K.
Total reported receipts $1,422,767
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
86% of the money placed by state came from inside Washington: $480.5K of $555.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,249 contributions · 86% | $480,468 |
| 21 contributions · 4% | $22,100 |
| 16 contributions · 3.8% | $20,925 |
| 42 contributions · 2.1% | $11,641 |
| 8 contributions · 1.1% | $6,250 |
| 25 contributions · 1% | $5,775 |
| 2 contributions · 0.5% | $2,750 |
| 18 contributions · 0.4% | $2,050 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 18 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,493 contributions · 61% of ranked | $335,524 |
| Written instead of an employer · 114 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $30,202 |
| 6 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $10,100 |
| 2 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $5,800 |
| 17 contributions · 1% of ranked | $5,750 |
| 6 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $425 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($267,142) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $10,146 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,031,721
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 947 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
49 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $107,784 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 53 payments · 14% of all spending | $174,559 |
| 20 payments · 12% of all spending | $156,192 |
| 93 payments · 12% of all spending | $150,780 |
| 7 payments · 12% of all spending | $147,500 |
| 42 payments · 7.8% of all spending | $99,825 |
| 19 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $44,118 |
| 6 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $35,000 |
| 13 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $29,050 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,295 contributions · 44% of ranked | $243,610 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 194 contributions · 16% of ranked | $91,464 |
| 43 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $27,211 |
| 24 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $13,800 |
| 12 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $12,150 |
| 35 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $9,850 |
| 5 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $9,334 |
| 46 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $8,890 |
A further $425 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($267,142) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.