Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MD-03 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, MD-03
Representative since 2025
11 priorities from elfrethformaryland.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Sarah was raised in a working-class, union household – and she is fighting to make sure the voices of families like the one she grew up in are heard in the halls of Congress. She has worked to lower costs for Maryland families by revoking the President’s reckless, price-raising tariffs. She has fought to expand access to affordable child care, reduce the burden of student loans, build more housing, and rollback BG&E utility rate increases. As a first-time home owner and young professional with student loans, these economic issues aren’t abstract – they are personal to Sarah. In Congress, she is committed to tackling the affordability crisis head-on and making sure families in the Third District don’t just get by, but get ahead.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
Sarah understands that protecting the Bay isn’t just the right thing to do for our environment. It’s the right thing to do for our economy and the thousands of Marylanders who earn their living on the Chesapeake Bay. On the House Natural Resources Committee, Sarah is fighting for a clean energy future, tackling rising tides by helping our neighbors become more resilient to climate change, and expanding access to the Bay for generations to come. Her first bipartisan legislation to pass the House floor independently was the MAWS Act, which tackles invasive blue catfish and saves keystone Maryland species like blue crabs, oysters, and rockfish.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
After President Trump sent undertrained ICE agents into our communities with masks, guns, and no respect for due process, Sarah fought for oversight and accountability. She stood with Howard County in blocking a new ICE facility in Elkridge, has conducted oversight of the Baltimore ICE holding facility, and has refused to fund a DHS and ICE that has been weaponized by this President.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
A daughter to two civil servants and the proud representative for the over 45,000 federal employees – and two to three times that number in contractors – who call the Third District home, Sarah has introduced and co-sponsored dozens of bills to strengthen protections for hardworking civil servants. The very first bill Sarah introduced in Congress was the first bipartisan piece of legislation to protect the future of the civil service from DOGE.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
On March 26th, 2024, the devastating collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge into the Patapsco River changed the lives and livelihoods of so many here in Maryland. We tragically lost six Marylanders who were simply doing their jobs: Alejandro, Dorlian, Maynor, Carlos, Miguel, and José.
Baltimore’s economic reality also changed instantly. The Port generates 15,300 direct jobs and supports another 140,000 – it’s a critical supply chain artery with economic implications far beyond Maryland. Sarah knows we must invest in the Port, support the workers and businesses affected by the collapse, and mitigate the disaster’s environmental impact. Sarah continues to work tirelessly with her colleagues in the Maryland Delegation to rebuild the bridge.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
As one of the youngest women serving in Congress, Sarah is a champion for reproductive justice. She believes that health care decisions should be made between you and your doctor – not extreme elected officials or judges. In the Maryland Senate, Sarah proudly voted to expand access to reproductive healthcare and co-sponsored a constitutional amendment to enshrine reproductive freedom as a fundamental right in Maryland’s Constitution. On Capitol Hill, Sarah is fighting to codify the protections once afforded by Roe v. Wade and ensure every Marylander has the freedom they deserve.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
Sarah believes everyone deserves access to affordable, quality health care. Her record reflects a commonsense approach: lower costs, expand access, improve quality of care, and protect science-based decision making. In Congress, Sarah has been on the frontlines fighting against extreme cuts to Medicaid in the Big Ugly Law and Republican attempts to weaken the Affordable Care Act. A cosponsor of Medicare for All, Sarah is committed to building a health care system that doesn’t leave anyone behind.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
For years, Maryland’s Third Congressional District was represented by Congressman John Sarbanes, a giant in the fight to protect and strengthen our democratic institutions. A cosponsor of the For The People Act and the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act, Sarah is committed to build on his historic legacy to protect voting rights, election integrity and security, campaign finance, and government ethics. Sarah has proudly pushed for a ban on Congressional stock trading to ensure our elected officials are working in your best interest – not the interest of their stock portfolio.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
As the daughter and granddaughter of Army, Navy, and Air Force veterans, Sarah is dedicated to supporting our brave servicemembers and veterans. On the House Armed Services Committee, she has made sure we honor the sacrifice of our men and women in uniform with not just words – but with actions. Sarah has secured funding for mental health services and expanding access to military medical facilities, like Walter Reed, so our veterans can receive the care they have earned.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
A very proud graduate of public schools – and a former Towson University professor – Sarah understands the difference that a good education can make and has been a leading champion for Maryland families and educators. Sarah has worked closely with educators and families to bring more federal funds to Maryland classrooms, including special education.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
Here in the Third District, we’ve seen the tragic impact of gun violence firsthand. In the Maryland Senate, Sarah worked to rebuild and keep our communities safe – and since coming to Congress, she has proudly supported commonsense gun safety legislation to close loopholes, ensure proper background checks, and ban assault weapons. Sarah believes that Congress has a responsibility to address the gun violence epidemic in our country – because no one should be scared to attend their home of worship and no parent should be scared to send their kids to school.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · elfrethformaryland.com/issues
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 12 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Armed Services
House Committee on Natural Resources
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Elfreth’s 17 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00855353
85¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.2M of $1.4M). Cash on hand went from $103.5K on Mar 31, 2025 to $240.9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $151,277 | $78,537 | $103,479 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $166,636 | $86,522 | $183,593 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $227,740 | $119,119 | $292,213 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $138,678 | $71,252 | $359,639 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $271,523 | $226,445 | $404,716 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jun 3, 2026 | $108,035 | $198,056 | $314,695 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $77,629 | $56,498 | $335,826 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $228,321 | $332,921 | $231,226 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $60,156 | $50,495 | $240,887 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
25 endorsers listed on Sarah Elfreth’s own campaign site: 8 unions, 17 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 50,374 votes (75%) · 1 of 5 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,089 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $611.1K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 330 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $552.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,429,993
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
78% of the money placed by state came from inside Maryland: $479.3K of $611.1K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 919 contributions · 78% | $479,319 |
| 49 contributions · 6.9% | $42,296 |
| 42 contributions · 6.3% | $38,202 |
| 13 contributions · 4.2% | $25,750 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% | $4,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.5% | $3,250 |
| 3 contributions · 0.3% | $1,750 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 20 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 430 contributions · 24% of ranked | $137,498 |
| Written instead of an employer · 85 contributions · 8.5% of ranked | $49,090 |
| Written instead of an employer · 62 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $29,936 |
| 10 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $10,952 |
| 4 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $10,300 |
| 14 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $9,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($78,568) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $20,515 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $863,658
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 727 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
42 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $88,802 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 100 payments · 9.9% of all spending | $120,376 |
| 31 payments · 9.8% of all spending | $119,454 |
| 6 payments · 9.1% of all spending | $111,000 |
| 7 payments · 7.1% of all spending | $86,432 |
| 19 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $74,891 |
| 17 payments · 5.7% of all spending | $70,002 |
| 5 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $45,088 |
| 2 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $39,126 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 430 contributions · 23% of ranked | $137,498 |
| 48 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $44,090 |
| 29 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $43,652 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 59 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $28,856 |
| 39 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $22,225 |
| 13 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $16,502 |
| 10 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $14,400 |
| 5 contributions · 2% of ranked | $12,000 |
A further $9,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($78,568) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.