Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › SC-03 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, SC-03
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
5 priorities from sheribiggs.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The border crisis represents one of the most critical challenges facing our nation today - affecting each and every one of us, directly or indirectly, and undermining the very fabric of our society, our economy, and our national security. As our next Member of Congress, Sheri will work tirelessly to build the wall, stop the flow of illegal aliens and drugs into our country, and replace “catch-and-release” with “stop-and-deport.”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sheribiggs.com/issues
Heading as listed on sheribiggs.com/issues ↗ (opens sheribiggs.com/issues at this heading)
The Biden Administration and the career politicians’ excessive and wasteful spending have not only fueled inflation but also greatly harmed our children, grandchildren, and future generations with unconscionable debt. As our next Congresswoman, Sheri will fight for fiscal responsibility, accountability, and transparency of our hard-earned tax dollars.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sheribiggs.com/issues
Heading as listed on sheribiggs.com/issues ↗ (opens sheribiggs.com/issues at this heading)
As a Christian, Sheri believes all life is made in the image and likeness of God and it must be cherished. Like many women, Sheri faced significant challenges bringing life into this world, including multiple miscarriages and bed rest orders during her pregnancy of her son. Yet, despite the challenges, Sheri always thanked God for the beautiful creations He blessed her with. AS our Member of Congress, Sheri will use her voice and story to protect the sanctity of life and advance a true culture of life in this country.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sheribiggs.com/issues
Heading as listed on sheribiggs.com/issues ↗ (opens sheribiggs.com/issues at this heading)
Our nation is crippled by career politicians, those focused on getting and retaining titles. Our District and our nation need more political outsiders - just like President Trump - to prioritize the issues most important to the people and return the power to the American people. As our next Member of Congress, Sheri will do just that with integrity, humility, and accountability.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sheribiggs.com/issues
Heading as listed on sheribiggs.com/issues ↗ (opens sheribiggs.com/issues at this heading)
While the career politicians and bureaucrats can “magically” afford to put illegal immigrants in hotels that cost over $500 per night, there are far too many veteran needs being ignored. For generations, America has made promises to those who have made the commitment to serve. Not only has the nation failed to deliver on those promises, but the career politicians and bureaucrats don’t even care. Sheri has worn the uniform in combat and volunteers to support local veterans. That’s why, as our next Congresswoman, Sheri will fight as hard as ever to ensure those who sacrifice and have sacrificed for our nation receive the honor, dignity, respect, and care they deserve.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sheribiggs.com/issues
Heading as listed on sheribiggs.com/issues ↗ (opens sheribiggs.com/issues at this heading)
91% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 61 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
House Committee on Homeland Security
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Biggs’ 16 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00866426
86¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($609.6K of $706.8K). Cash on hand went from $110.6K on Mar 31, 2025 to $201.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $53,758 | $47,220 | $110,623 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $99,412 | $69,923 | $140,112 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $127,174 | $78,342 | $188,944 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $55,472 | $60,498 | $183,919 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $64,727 | $37,595 | $211,051 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 20, 2026 | $17,884 | $54,440 | $174,495 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $86,906 | $42,660 | $218,741 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $187,152 | $146,567 | $259,325 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $14,294 | $72,401 | $201,218 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 193 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $362.8K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 17 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $110.9K.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 65 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $83.8K.
Total reported receipts $706,779
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
60% of the money placed by state came from inside South Carolina: $50.3K of $83.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 34 contributions · 60% | $50,324 |
| 3 contributions · 11% | $9,000 |
| 2 contributions · 8.4% | $7,000 |
| 9 contributions · 5.1% | $4,250 |
| 6 contributions · 4.3% | $3,626 |
| 1 contribution · 4.2% | $3,500 |
| 3 contributions · 2.1% | $1,750 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% | $1,250 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 12 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 16 contributions · 37% of ranked | $25,285 |
| Written instead of an employer · 5 contributions · 14% of ranked | $9,291 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 4.9% of ranked | $3,300 |
| 1 contribution · 3.8% of ranked | $2,602 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $1,500 |
A further $16,102 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,191) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $7,964 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $449,976
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 318 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
24 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $2,857 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 payments · 30% of all spending | $182,868 |
| 14 payments · 7.8% of all spending | $47,408 |
| 25 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $40,662 |
| 1 payment · 3.1% of all spending | $18,900 |
| 3 payments · 3% of all spending | $18,000 |
| 9 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $16,650 |
| 37 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $15,594 |
| 4 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $13,893 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 17 contributions · 38% of ranked | $25,785 |
| 2 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $3,750 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 4.9% of ranked | $3,300 |
| 5 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $2,750 |
A further $16,602 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,191) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.