Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › IN-01 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, IN-01
Representative since 2021
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
6 priorities from mrvanforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
This nation’s border is a matter of national security and Frank believes in securing the border with safe, secure and humane policies.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mrvanforcongress.com
Heading as listed on mrvanforcongress.com ↗ (opens mrvanforcongress.com at this heading)
Frank is honored to serve on the House Appropriations Committee, which is responsible for allocating funding for the federal government. In his role, Frank fights for our region’s values to ensure our federal budget is aligned with our priorities.
Frank proudly supported the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which made much needed investments in our ports, airports, waterways, roads, bridges, railways, and broadband internet. Frank has done extensive work to deliver federal funding for local infrastructure improvements throughout our region.
Frank has delivered over $100 million through federal Community Project Funding awards for projects throughout Northwest Indiana to grow our economy. Frank is proud to partner with community leaders to deliver funding for infrastructure upgrades, environmental preservation, first responders, and institutions of higher learning. Frank supported the more than $1 billion expansion and extension of the South Shore Passenger Rail Line that is now under construction, and the private sector investments are already beginning in places like Michigan City because of this historic investment in our public transportation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mrvanforcongress.com/issues
Families in Northwest Indiana are facing economic uncertainty as the price of healthcare, gas, groceries, and utility bills skyrocket. Frank is committed to finding bipartisan solutions to lower the cost of living and make life more affordable.
Frank took on Big Pharma to lower healthcare prices and make prescription drug prices more affordable with the Inflation Reduction Act. For the first time ever, Medicare is allowed to directly negotiate prescription drug prices, out-of-pocket costs for insulin are limited at $35 per month, and Medicare Part D out-of-pocket drug costs are capped at $2,000 – a proud achievement of Frank’s.
While the State of Indiana sets utility rates, the federal government has a role in expanding supply and lowering costs. Frank serves on the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water where he is holding the Department of Energy accountable for the utility rate increases in Northwest Indiana. He supports investments in wind, solar, and hydrogen, and to increase the supply of more affordable energy to reduce costs and strengthen our energy independence.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mrvanforcongress.com/issues
Frank is standing up to greedy corporations who exploit the middle-class and take advantage of workers for their own profits. In response to skyrocketing utility rates, Frank asked Energy Secretary Wright to reverse the emergency order to require NIPSCO to keep utilizing coal-fired electric generation past its retirement date. This is expected to cost more than $100 million and further increase utility costs for ratepayers. Frank continues to call on British Petroleum, an international offshore company, to return to the bargaining table and end the lockout impacting over 800 members of the United Steelworkers Local 7-1. Frank will continue to stand with working men and women in their fight for fair wages, safe working conditions, and sound retirements.
Frank is taking action to end corruption in Washington. He supports banning all stock trading by Members of Congress, because public servants are elected to serve – not get rich from insider information. Frank voted against spending $1 billion taxpayer dollars to build the White House ballroom. In response to the White House using foreign materials for construction, Frank introduced an amendment to require all steel used in construction projects at the White House to be made in America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mrvanforcongress.com/issues
Throughout Frank’s career, he has been proud to stand shoulder to shoulder with the men and women of organized labor. He knows that unions are the foundation of the strength of the Northwest Indiana economy, and it is the advocacy of unions that created a strong middle-class. As the Vice Chairman of the Congressional Steel Caucus and a member of the Congressional Labor Caucus, Frank understands the value of all members of organized labor, who are on the frontlines fighting for superior working conditions across our country. Frank is proud to support the Protecting the Right to Organize Act so that all workers have the right and ability to form a union. He has also been a steadfast supporter of expanded Buy America requirements, of Davis-Bacon wage requirements, and the use of Project Labor Agreements
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mrvanforcongress.com/issues
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Indiana was the first state in the country to institute a statewide abortion ban. Women’s access to reproductive healthcare is under attack. With federal legislation proposed to ban abortion nationwide, it’s more important than ever that we send Frank back to Congress to fight for our freedoms. Frank supports the codification of Roe v. Wade and will continue fighting to ensure that women can make their own decisions about their own bodies, their own futures, and their own economic opportunities.
Frank is an original cosponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, legislation to ensure women have access to reproductive care after Roe v. Wade was reversed.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mrvanforcongress.com/issues
94% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 39 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Mrvan’s 19 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00727529
77¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($2.4M of $3M). Cash on hand went from $238.4K on Mar 31, 2025 to $772.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $267,592 | $117,631 | $238,422 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $322,567 | $181,762 | $379,227 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $457,775 | $155,823 | $681,180 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $371,535 | $144,429 | $908,286 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $408,046 | $233,088 | $1,083,244 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 15, 2026 | $46,129 | $40,422 | $1,088,950 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $512,623 | $264,877 | $1,336,696 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $565,360 | $880,081 | $1,021,975 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $83,794 | $333,542 | $772,227 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
44 endorsers listed on Frank J. Mrvan’s own campaign site: 34 unions, 10 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 42,480 votes (80%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Won · 142,262 votes (56%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,863 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.1M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 664 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 5 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 12 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $120.1K.
Total reported receipts $3,035,422
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
43% of the money placed by state came from inside Indiana: $454.7K of $1.1M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,229 contributions · 43% | $454,706 |
| 148 contributions · 13% | $141,417 |
| 79 contributions · 12% | $126,962 |
| 48 contributions · 8.5% | $89,985 |
| 21 contributions · 3.2% | $34,137 |
| 49 contributions · 3.1% | $32,577 |
| 15 contributions · 2.5% | $26,250 |
| 58 contributions · 2.5% | $26,240 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 34 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,580 contributions · 39% of ranked | $376,175 |
| Written instead of an employer · 241 contributions · 11% of ranked | $107,545 |
| 7 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $24,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 10 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $8,550 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $7,000 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($224,755) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $19,059 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,457,051
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,029 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
40 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $184,220 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 12% of all spending | $284,616 |
| 20 payments · 7% of all spending | $164,424 |
| 21 payments · 6.3% of all spending | $148,500 |
| 27 payments · 5.2% of all spending | $123,005 |
| 19 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $76,547 |
| 19 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $66,423 |
| 13 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $62,792 |
| 8 payments · 2% of all spending | $46,596 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,429 contributions · 27% of ranked | $280,506 |
| 175 contributions · 14% of ranked | $147,964 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 149 contributions · 8.9% of ranked | $94,169 |
| 55 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $50,049 |
| 36 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $47,850 |
| 36 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $33,150 |
| 10 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $29,675 |
| 25 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $29,000 |
A further $442 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($224,755) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.