Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MN-07 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, MN-07
Representative since 2021
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
9 priorities from fischbachforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
We must protect the unborn, who have the fundamental right to life, and defend the sanctity of innocent human life at all stages from conception to natural death. As a co-chair of the House Pro-Life Caucus, I have continued to fight for policies that defend life, stop federal funding for abortion and support protections for the most vulnerable. I will continue standing up to efforts by the radical left to promote infanticide and taxpayer-funded abortions. We have achieved significant wins, such as the 2022 Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. But there is still so much work to do to change hearts and minds to understand that the pro-life community strives to protect the mother and the child. We are all made in the image of the Creator, and I will always support legislation that protects human life at all stages.
Scorecard: Michelle has a lifetime voting record of 100% with National Right to Life and an A+ rating with Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/issues
We must vigilantly defend our right to keep and bear arms. The United States Constitution is unambiguous: our right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Period. I have stood up to efforts by the radical left to abolish the Second Amendment and confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens. I will continue to defend the Constitutional right and vote to protect the right of every lawful gun owner in the United States to keep America free.
Scorecard: Michelle has a lifetime “A” rating with the National Rifle Association and the Gun Owners of America. She also has an A+ rating from the National Shooting Sports Foundation and was named to their “Dean’s List” for co-sponsoring key legislation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/issues
The first responsibility of government is to protect the rights and safety of its people. Now that the Trump administration has secured our borders, we need to support law enforcement officials at all levels to enforce our immigration laws. I continue to stand up to efforts by the radical left to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and promote sanctuary cities. The vast majority of law enforcement officers take their duty to serve and protect, not just as a job, but as a commitment to our communities. Law enforcement officers encounter everything from violent crimes to teaching children about community safety. They deserve our respect and support through programs to help recruit new officers and provide appropriate training and equipment. I have and will continue to work in Congress to protect our officers and reduce the criminal threats they face.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/issues
Religious liberty is the cornerstone of our Republic. Government should never be able to compel you to violate your religious beliefs or convictions in the workplace nor take away parental decision-making in healthcare, education or athletics. I will always stand against efforts to undermine the free exercise of religious beliefs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/issues
Farmers and ranchers are the backbone of our economy in western Minnesota. Too often, our farmers and ranchers face unnecessary challenges that hamper their ability to bring their goods to the market. I have worked to support efforts to secure good trade deals for our farmers, rebuild outdated infrastructure to create greater rural prosperity, protect and expand important tax policies, and invest in workforce development programs that prepare our workers for the jobs of tomorrow. I have regional agricultural advisory groups that meet regularly to keep me informed of changing conditions, such as labor shortages, disaster relief, and market pressures. Their direct input is vital to prioritize issues and policies that continue to support our district’s farmers and agricultural communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/issues
Minnesota’s fraud crisis grew under failed oversight, ignored warning signs, and a system that punished whistleblowers instead of listening to them. Starting in September of 2022, I led and joined multiple congressional efforts demanding answers, pressing federal agencies for documents, and forcing accountability when officials tried to dodge responsibility. I will continue to pursue the truth about where our tax dollars went and who looked the other way because this fraud scandal is about trust and fiduciary duty of government officials.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/issues
I carried the “Zero Based Budgeting” Bill while in the Minnesota State Senate, and brought that same philosophy to Washington, D.C. With Zero Based Budgeting, the budget would start from ZERO rather than the current approach of adjusting up or down from existing spending levels. Each department would need to justify the effectiveness of its programs in order to continue to receive funding for them. This approach is very similar to the work of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to understand better, not only for transparency but for accountability, what’s in the sprawling federal budget because Washington has a spending problem.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/issues
We must honor our commitment to the brave men and women of our United States military, who make great sacrifices to protect our country and keep America safe. While serving, we must make sure they have the tools they need to complete their mission. After serving, our veterans deserve to be welcomed home with honor by a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) that puts them and their families first. In Congress, I have co-sponsored bills and worked to have legislation to increase support for veterans.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/issues
We must fix our broken health care system to give American families better access to high-quality, affordable health care plans. Obamacare has been a disaster that took important health care choices away from millions of Americans, and has massively increased costs for families, despite its misleading name. I have and will continue to work to protect the promises we have made to our seniors and pass patient-centered reforms that increase competition and lower costs, without sacrificing protections for individuals with preexisting conditions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/issues
Healthcare ↗ (opens fischbachforcongress.com/record at this heading)
- Co-sponsored bill to establish requirements for Medicare Advantage plans regarding the use of prior authorization to speed up patient care for seniors. (H.R. 3514, Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act)
- Co-sponsored bill to ensure prompt and permanent Medicare coverage for innovative medical devices designated as breakthrough technologies. (H.R. 5343, Ensuring Patient Access to Critical Breakthrough Products Act) – 119
- Co-sponsored bill to amend the Social Security Act to permit Medicaid coverage for services furnished to patients in institutions for mental diseases. (H.R. 5944, Restoring Inpatient Mental Health Access Act) – 119
- Win – the Trump administration formally withdrew from the WHO on 1/22/26.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · fischbachforcongress.com/record
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 11 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Ways and Means
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Fischbach’s 52 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00717959
73¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.2M of $1.7M). Cash on hand went from $477.1K on Mar 31, 2025 to $866.4K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $152,240 | $86,211 | $477,110 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $158,285 | $107,435 | $527,959 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $288,795 | $154,656 | $662,099 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $209,587 | $104,952 | $766,734 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $178,725 | $138,562 | $806,897 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $251,741 | $155,970 | $902,668 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 22, 2026 | $46,655 | $29,500 | $919,823 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $353,145 | $357,455 | $915,512 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $33,932 | $83,082 | $866,362 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
3 endorsers listed on Michelle Fischbach’s own campaign site: 1 official, 2 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
President of the United States
The Minn Farm Bureau Political Action Committee (MFB PAC)
“One of the strengths of the Farm Bureau endorsement process is the direct connection it creates between candidates and our grassroots members,” said State PAC Committee Chair Delvin Durheim. “The candidates we’ve endorsed have shown their commitment to support agriculture in our state. We look forward to continuing to build those connections and working together on issues that matter to the future of our member’s livelihoods.” “I am honored to receive MFB PAC endorsement and am grateful for the partnership I have with the Farm Bureau,” reacted Fischbach. “They are invaluable to help me connect directly with producers across western Minnesota for timely updates on their challenges and opportunities. I am honored to receive the MFB PAC endorsement as a validation of the commitment we share to a prosperous agriculture community.”
The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)
“The candidates we endorsed have a deep understanding of the issues that matter most to Minnesota small business owners,” said Jon Boesche, NFIB Minnesota State Director. “These individuals are reliable advocates for pro-Main Street policies, and they understand what Minnesota small business owners mean to America’s economy. We look forward to working with them to create an environment where independent businesses can continue to grow and create jobs.” “On behalf of Minnesota small businesses, we are proud to endorse a slate of candidates who have demonstrated a steadfast commitment to advancing small business interests,” said Louis Bertolotti, NFIB Political Director. “Electing legislators who prioritize independent businesses will allow owners to continue to operate and grow their businesses. These candidates have pledged to build on last year’s great win for Main Street: permanency for the 20% Small Business Deduction. We look forward to continuing to work with these pro-business leaders.”
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 455 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $930K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 705 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $313.9K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 3 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 22 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $76.2K.
Total reported receipts $1,673,105
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
59% of the money placed by state came from inside Minnesota: $186.3K of $313.9K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 490 contributions · 59% | $186,321 |
| 13 contributions · 10% | $32,750 |
| 32 contributions · 7.6% | $23,785 |
| 14 contributions · 5.9% | $18,644 |
| 21 contributions · 2.8% | $8,762 |
| 13 contributions · 2.6% | $8,270 |
| 12 contributions · 2.5% | $7,790 |
| 17 contributions · 2.2% | $7,035 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 27 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 contributions · 13% of ranked | $27,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 59 contributions · 8.8% of ranked | $19,057 |
| 5 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $14,287 |
| 2 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $6,600 |
| 5 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $5,500 |
| 3 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $5,250 |
A further $96,593 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($187,237) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $1,937 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $855,029
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 511 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
7 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $50,337 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 19% of all spending | $234,123 |
| 26 payments · 9.5% of all spending | $115,473 |
| 11 payments · 8.6% of all spending | $104,391 |
| 10 payments · 8.4% of all spending | $102,181 |
| 25 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $59,646 |
| 2 payments · 4% of all spending | $48,370 |
| 20 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $41,122 |
| 20 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $17,200 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 433 contributions · 28% of ranked | $87,956 |
| 20 contributions · 12% of ranked | $37,687 |
| 10 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $11,350 |
| 12 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $9,760 |
| 27 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $8,983 |
| 9 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $7,875 |
| 7 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $7,250 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $1,787 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($187,237) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.