Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NC-10 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, NC-10
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
9 priorities from harriganforcongressnc.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
We have a duty to provide the next generation of Americans more opportunity than we have been endowed. To do this, we need reasonable, consistent, and principled leaders and policies that will usher in a new era of American exceptionalism. Our best days are yet to come, because Pat refuses to hand his children—or your children— anything less.
Economy ↗ (opens harriganforcongressnc.com at this heading)
The foundation of strong and resilient families is a strong economy. A roaring economy free from rampant inflation, present stress, and future uncertainty is only achieved when we cut the chains of senseless spending and government overreach. As Americans, we do better when we are free to make our own decisions with our hard-earned money and when government gets out of the way of the American people.
Family Safety ↗ (opens harriganforcongressnc.com at this heading)
We cannot hope to secure the bright future of tomorrow if we cannot secure our communities today. We must make respect for the rule of law a priority in our society. That starts with bringing federal law and state law into congruence and promoting personal responsibility through real consequences. And it is implemented by promoting policy and investment that adequately resources our police—not by defunding the police. And we must secure our schools.
Education ↗ (opens harriganforcongressnc.com at this heading)
There is no greater gift in life than a sound education. Unacceptably, falling test scores, grade-behind reading levels, and ideological indoctrination mark today’s public school experience for our children. We must give parents school-choice options today while elected officials at the state level revamp our public school systems. Our children’s futures cannot wait on government solutions that are distant years off.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harriganforcongressnc.com
Heading as listed on harriganforcongressnc.com ↗ (opens harriganforcongressnc.com at this heading)
The extreme base of the Democratic party and the policies of the Biden Administration wrecked an economy that was roaring in years past. Their runaway spending, out-of-control inflation, crippling grocery prices, and high taxes are ruining the lives of hardworking Americans. Now, NC-10 has a leader who knows what it’s like to sign the front of a paycheck; a business owner who employs over 50 people and knows how to stick to a budget. Pat is fighting in Washington to curb inflation, cut wasteful spending, decrease taxes, and lower energy prices.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harriganforcongressnc.com/issues
America’s energy problem is an economic crisis and a matter of national security. We must act now to become energy independent. We can no longer afford to buy oil and other resources from our enemies. We need an all-of-the-above approach to energy that aggressively puts America on the fast-track to independence. That includes domestic oil exploration, pipeline construction, fracking, nuclear energy development, solar, wind, coal, and all other forms of energy that America has proven we can produce cleanly, safely, efficiently and effectively.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harriganforcongressnc.com/issues
President Biden’s Afghanistan disaster was criminally incompetent. Here is the simple truth: When America fails to lead the world burns. The weakness that America has displayed not only creates opportunities for international conflict, but it presents serious national security threats here at home. As a Green Beret combat Veteran, Pat knows firsthand the dangers that we face inside and outside of our borders. We must reinvest in our military, and give our soldiers the tools and support they need to do their jobs. And we must reestablish America as the world’s leading superpower.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harriganforcongressnc.com/issues
Under President Joe Biden, we didn’t have a border. Without a border, we don’t have a country. Open borders are a direct threat to our national security. From gang violence to sex trafficking and drug smuggling to terrorism, the open border policy of the Biden Administration hurt all of us. Now that President Trump has been reelected to the White House, we’re making the border secure and restoring safety across the country. We owe it to our Border Patrol agents to provide them with every necessary resource. Only then can they defend themselves, truly secure our frontlines, and ensure our national security. Pat is working hand in hand with the Trump Administration to secure our border and enforce Federal law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harriganforcongressnc.com/issues
Firearms are a valuable part of our identity as Americans. From firearms, we derive our ability to hunt, defend ourselves and our families, and secure our freedoms. As a Special Forces combat Veteran and owner of one of the fastest-growing manufacturers of firearms and firearm components in the country, Pat is keenly aware of the importance of the 2nd Amendment and what it means to us as Americans. He will always fight to protect our right to keep and bear arms, believes in the fundamental right of Constitutional carry, and rejects any attempt to impose red flags on those exercising their Second Amendment rights.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harriganforcongressnc.com/issues
When we vote as residents of North Carolina, we should have to show identification and confirm our identities in a meaningful way. As the right to vote is one of the most sacred foundational responsibilities of our citizenry, we must endeavor that the result be secure and trusted—or we will have lost our country. We must pass election laws that make it easier to vote, and harder to cheat, and that push power down to the local and state levels.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harriganforcongressnc.com/issues
Pat sees conservative values as the bedrock of our nation. To uphold these ideals, he fights to protect the unborn, stands firm with parental rights, defends women’s sports, and safeguards religious freedom.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harriganforcongressnc.com/issues
The first and primary mission of the US government is to keep our citizens safe and secure. Joe Biden and the radical left abandoned that noble calling in favor of caving to the woke mob that supports them. As a Green Beret, Pat is trained to keep our people safe, and that’s what we should be doing now. He’s working alongside President Trump to crack down on violent crime, get drug traffickers and gangs off the streets, enforce immigration laws, and put fear back in the minds of criminals. Pat is standing up to politicians who want to bring casinos and gambling to our neighborhoods, which will create more crime than jobs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harriganforcongressnc.com/issues
92% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 55 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Armed Services
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Harrigan’s 30 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00802298
69¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($908.1K of $1.3M). Cash on hand went from $126.9K on Mar 31, 2025 to $463K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $146,002 | $71,918 | $126,926 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $241,101 | $150,506 | $217,521 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $160,140 | $118,099 | $259,562 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $197,149 | $112,679 | $344,032 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $79,406 | $64,820 | $358,619 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $150,178 | $68,516 | $440,280 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $107,845 | $96,850 | $451,275 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $220,870 | $55,601 | $616,544 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $15,542 | $169,108 | $462,978 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
1 endorser listed on Pat Harrigan’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 46,270 votes (88%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,378 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $556.7K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 279 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $456.4K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 8 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $86K.
Total reported receipts $1,318,233
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
42% of the money placed by state came from inside North Carolina: $231.5K of $556.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 224 contributions · 42% | $231,481 |
| 112 contributions · 9% | $50,227 |
| 66 contributions · 8.4% | $46,681 |
| 61 contributions · 6.8% | $37,896 |
| 277 contributions · 4.6% | $25,453 |
| 27 contributions · 4.5% | $25,040 |
| 143 contributions · 4.4% | $24,248 |
| 25 contributions · 4.1% | $22,816 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 38 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,027 contributions · 18% of ranked | $98,410 |
| Written instead of an employer · 25 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $31,289 |
| 4 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 6 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $14,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $11,029 |
| 4 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 7 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $9,770 |
A further $19,811 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($93,906) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $28,187 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $722,876
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,099 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
3 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $74,048 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 12% of all spending | $107,500 |
| 8 payments · 9% of all spending | $81,585 |
| 10 payments · 6.6% of all spending | $59,639 |
| 235 payments · 6.4% of all spending | $57,812 |
| 1 payment · 6.3% of all spending | $57,637 |
| 8 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $55,802 |
| 4 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $53,511 |
| 7 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $27,860 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,026 contributions · 18% of ranked | $97,410 |
| 32 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $34,550 |
| 22 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $31,931 |
| 31 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $27,540 |
| 10 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $27,500 |
| 16 contributions · 5% of ranked | $27,060 |
| 8 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $24,500 |
| 11 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $13,270 |
A further $19,811 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($93,906) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.