Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › ID-02 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, ID-02
Representative since 1999
8 priorities from simpsonforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Securing the border and stopping illegal immigration is the most important issue facing our nation today: Joe Biden’s disastrous immigration policies have allowed millions of people to illegally cross our border, including criminals, cartels, and those on terrorist watch list. I am fighting to build the wall, add more border patrol agents, and stop Biden’s…
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issues
Joe Biden’s disastrous immigration policies have allowed millions of people to illegally cross our border, including criminals, cartels, and those on terrorist watch list. I am fighting to build the wall, add more border patrol agents, and stop Biden’s open border policies. I will stand with President Trump to finish the border wall and stop illegal immigration once and for all.
Instead of working with Congress to pursue comprehensive reforms, the Biden administration has effectively opened the border and forced states and cities to pick up the slack while the cartels continue to wreak havoc and profit from the trafficking of deadly drugs like fentanyl. The American people deserve better.
As Congress considers comprehensive reform of our nation’s immigration system, I am deeply concerned over proposals that would grant amnesty to illegal immigrants in the United States. Giving amnesty to those who have broken our nation’s immigration laws would undermine the policies that were established to regulate our borders and provide an orderly process of evaluating applications for citizenship. Such action would send a terrible message to all those who have complied with immigration laws and are still waiting approval. In addition, by rewarding those who violate United States law, we jeopardize the security and safety of our nation and greatly diminish our ability to protect our borders.
I will continue working to find the best ways to enforce our borders and set new guidelines for immigration procedures. In the past, I have cosponsored legislation to give law enforcement officers power to detain criminals who are also illegal immigrants, prohibit states from issuing driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants, expedite and fund the construction of a fence along our southern border, and prohibit access to Social Security by illegal immigrants. I have also worked closely with our farmers and ranchers that depend on guestworker labor to explore options to reforming this program. Idaho’s economy depends on agriculture labor, and without a legal means to solve this outdated system, we are doing our farmers a great disservice.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issue/immigration
Heading as listed on simpsonforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens simpsonforcongress.com/issues at this heading) · “Issues” on simpsonforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens simpsonforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Fighting for Idaho Farmers: During my time in Congress, I have made the promotion of Idaho agriculture one of my top priorities. As a member of the House Potato Caucus, House Sugar Caucus, and the Congressional Dairy Caucus, I am working with members across the aisle, and across the country, to promote and protect industries…
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issues
During my time in Congress, I have made the promotion of Idaho agriculture one of my top priorities. As a member of the House Potato Caucus, House Sugar Caucus, and the Congressional Dairy Caucus, I am working with members across the aisle, and across the country, to promote and protect industries vital to our state’s economy and way of life. We depend on agriculture to feed and clothe our nation and to help meet the needs of many around the world. In order to do so, farmers and ranchers are continually working to ensure that their operations are sustainable and efficient. A wide variety of issues, including transportation, trade agreements, taxes, energy, and environmental issues, directly impact the cost of production, and I believe that Congress should carefully consider the impact of legislation on our farmers and ranchers, working to ensure that they have the tools they need to succeed.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issue/agriculture
Opposing the Socialist Energy Takeover: While I share the concerns of many Americans about climate change, I am also concerned about the overreaching and ambiguous nature of the Green New Deal. For example, I was very concerned to hear the lead sponsor of the legislation, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) say that the plan would transition…
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issues
While I share the concerns of many Americans about climate change, I am also concerned about the overreaching and ambiguous nature of the Green New Deal. For example, I was very concerned to hear the lead sponsor of the legislation, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) say that the plan would transition off nuclear and all fossil fuels as soon as possible. I’ve said for years that I don’t believe you can seriously talk about addressing climate change without talking about nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is 100% carbon-free and currently supplies more than half of our nation’s carbon-free energy.
I am also concerned about the cost of the Green New Deal and the potential impacts on our economy if we shift away from affordable energy sources before new energy sources are ready to come online. Most economists agree that the plan lacks details to assign it a specific cost, but the price tag could be as much as 93 trillion dollars according to one source. At $93 trillion, the Green New Deal would cost more than the entire recorded spending of the US since the Constitution went into effect in 1789. Compare that to a more contemporary number, the World Bank estimates the global gross domestic product at $81 trillion. On top of that, this debt is built on a premise that insults hard-working Americans by guaranteeing a living wage even if you are “unwilling” to work. If someone is getting a deal here, it is not the taxpayers.
I recognize that there is consensus among most policymakers that we must develop clean, alternative fuels in order to curb the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted into the atmosphere. As Ranking Member of the House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee and a member of the House Interior and Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, I have long been a supporter of renewable energy, and in Idaho, we certainly understand the importance of it through geothermal in Boise and the incredible research and innovation with nuclear energy technologies at the Idaho National Lab.
Instead of creating a host of government mandates and forcing consumers to foot the bill for these regulations, I support using technology, incentives, and innovation to move our economy to more sustainable, independent energy sources. I believe that to do so we must look at all the options, including renewable energy, nuclear energy, and domestic oil production, and be realistic about how that transition can and should occur.
These are real problems, and they must be addressed in a common sense, thoughtful way. I look forward to the debate in Congress.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issue/green-new-deal-our-energy-future
Taking Care of Our Heroes: As a former member of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs and current member of the House Appropriations Committee, I am committed to making sure our nation fulfills its obligations to our nation’s veterans and fully funds the operations of the Veterans Administration. The great State of Idaho is home…
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issues
As a former member of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs and current member of the House Appropriations Committee, I am committed to making sure our nation fulfills its obligations to our nation’s veterans and fully funds the operations of the Veterans Administration. The great State of Idaho is home to thousands of men and women who have served our nation honorably both at home and abroad and who are owed a great debt of gratitude for their service. It is important that on both a state and federal level we not forget the promises made to those who have served, nor the sacrifices our nation’s veterans have made to protect the freedoms we all enjoy as Americans. While our nation must come to grips with its overspending and growing nation debt, one place where funding must not be cut nor our commitment reduced is in the area of veterans’ benefits and healthcare. I am grateful that Congress has worked to increase funding for these important programs and am committed to ensuring that progress is not lost in the future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issue/veterans
Mike Simpson knows that the only way to protect our elections from fraud and illegal votes is to uphold the constitution and require a real, photo ID for anyone who wants to vote. Whether you vote at the polls or vote at home by absentee ballot, Mike Simpson is going to make sure only legal voters vote in Idaho.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issue/obamacare-and-medicare-for-all
Heading as listed on simpsonforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens simpsonforcongress.com/issues at this heading) · “Issues” on simpsonforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens simpsonforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
The Second Amendment to the Constitution reads: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” I firmly believe this provision prohibits the federal government from denying citizens this right. Therefore, I will not…
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issues
The Second Amendment to the Constitution reads: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” I firmly believe this provision prohibits the federal government from denying citizens this right.
Therefore, I will not support bans on the ownership of firearms, or legislation that promotes or requires the rationing or taxation of firearms or ammunition. Contrary to the claims of gun control advocates, gun ownership is not the sole source of our gun-related crime problem. Illegal firearms trafficking and our “revolving door” justice system, and deficiencies in mental healthcare are significant contributing factors. I will continue to support legislation to reform our justice system to impose stiff sentences on criminals who use a gun while committing a crime. Individuals must understand that criminal behavior will not be tolerated, and will be met with grave penalties.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issue/guns
Balancing Our Spending: If there is one common theme I hear from Idahoans as I travel the state, it is their concern with the size of the federal budget and the impact our nation’s debt will have on future generations. I couldn’t agree more, and believe getting our fiscal house in order must be the…
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issues
If there is one common theme I hear from Idahoans as I travel the state, it is their concern with the size of the federal budget and the impact our nation’s debt will have on future generations. I couldn’t agree more, and believe getting our fiscal house in order must be the first priority of a Congress. That is one of the reasons why I am an original cosponsor of H.J. Res. 22, which would amend the U.S. Constitution to require a balanced budget. I also support reinstituting true pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) budget practices in Congress so that any spending increase in one area must be paid for with a spending decrease in another area. These are the kinds of budgetary practices American families and businesses have to live with every single day and there is no reason why Congress shouldn’t live by them as well.
For years, I have advocated that Congress pursue a “go big” approach to deficit reduction that would find at least $4 trillion in savings by putting all options on the table. This would include deep cuts to yearly discretionary spending, serious proposals to reform our tax system, and most importantly, lasting reforms to our mandatory spending programs.
Congress has successfully tackled one of those three challenges—reforming our tax code. Congress has also cut more than a trillion dollars in discretionary spending in the last several years. Many of these decisions were made by me and my colleagues on the House Appropriations Committee. But those two things alone will never solve our national debt crisis.
Addressing the growth of mandatory programs is the final challenge that Congress will need to tackle to address our fiscal health. It is the main driver of our debt and deficits, and it is also the most difficult to take on. Cutting or even eliminating all discretionary spending only has a small impact on the growth of government, since mandatory entitlement programs take up two-thirds of the federal budget. In FY16, mandatory spending was 69% of our total spending while all other spending that Congress controls (including the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, Justice, Health and Human Services, Energy, Interior, Transportation, State, and others) totaled 31%. If left unchecked, by 2040, those numbers will grow to 81% mandatory and 19% discretionary. To put that in historical context, in 1965 and those numbers were 34% mandatory and 66% discretionary.
Americans have spent their working lifetimes paying into these mandatory programs, and growth like this is unsustainable. The fundamentals are simply not working anymore, as only 2.9 workers pay into Social Security for every one beneficiary (as opposed to 159 workers per beneficiary when the program was set up in 1940). Social Security trustees have recently said that the Social Security trust fund will be insolvent by 2034. Every proposal that I have ever supported to update or reform these programs would preserve these benefits for current beneficiaries, and save it for future generations that are currently at risk of not receiving these benefits.
The longer we wait to address these issues, the more difficult they will be to solve. As I have said time and time again, I stand ready to work with any colleague who is willing to take on the tough issues that are busting our budgets year in and year out, which unfortunately have gone ignored for far too long.
As a member of both the House Budget Committee and the House Appropriations Committee, I will continue pushing for a balanced budget amendment, true PAYGO reform, and real budget reductions as components of a overall strategy to get our federal budget under control and set the course for aggressive economic growth.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issue/budget-spending
100% pro-life voting record: I am pro-life and committed to protecting the unborn. I oppose abortion as a means of birth control, with exceptions in instances of rape, incest, or if the life of the mother is in danger. I oppose using tax dollars to pay for abortions and have consistently voted to cut off…
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issues
I am pro-life and committed to protecting the unborn. I oppose abortion as a means of birth control, with exceptions in instances of rape, incest, or if the life of the mother is in danger. I oppose using tax dollars to pay for abortions and have consistently voted to cut off federal funding for any organization that offers or encourages abortions. I am endorsed by National Right to Life for my 100% pro-life voting record. My record of fighting for the unborn has also earned me an A+ rating with the pro-life group The Susan B. Anthony List. I will continue fighting for pro-life policies in Congress 100% of the time.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · simpsonforcongress.com/issue/protecting-life
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 22 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Simpson’s 17 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00331397
86¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.2M of $1.4M). Cash on hand went from $170K on Mar 31, 2025 to $300.6K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $163,233 | $98,406 | $170,033 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $112,601 | $99,062 | $183,572 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $310,953 | $108,517 | $386,008 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $141,686 | $98,811 | $428,883 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $113,177 | $138,340 | $403,720 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $83,075 | $64,045 | $422,750 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $193,369 | $186,760 | $429,359 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $198,532 | $343,309 | $284,582 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $92,586 | $76,577 | $300,591 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
11 endorsers listed on Michael K. Simpson’s own campaign site: 7 officials, 4 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
“Congressman Mike Simpson is a Fantastic Advocate for Idaho’s 2nd Congressional District! Mike served as the Highly Respected Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives, prior to becoming a very distinguished U.S. Congressman. In Congress, he is fighting tirelessly to Grow our Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Promote our Amazing Farmers and Ranchers, Advance MADE IN THE U.S.A., Champion American Energy DOMINANCE, Keep our now very Secure Border, SECURE, Stop Migrant Crime, Ensure LAW AND ORDER, Strengthen our Great Military/Veterans, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment. Mike Simpson has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election — HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!”
“Mike Simpson has proven over and over that he is the conservative leader we need fighting for Idaho families and Idaho values in Congress. He is a tried and true principled leader who has delivered on conservative results in Idaho and the country on important issues like balancing the budget and lowering taxes on hard-working Americans. It is an honor to co-chair his campaign.”
“As I have worked closely with Mike Simpson over the years, I have seen his integrity, his tireless work ethic, and his proven track record of delivering results on the issues that matter most to our state and our Idaho way of life. I look forward to supporting Mike’s re-election campaign, because we need Mike Simpson fighting for Idaho and our conservative values in Congress. I urge voters to join me in standing with Mike.”
Lieutenant Governor Scott Bedke
“I am pleased to co-chair and support Mike’s re-election campaign. Mike Simpson has a proven record of delivering for Idaho. He has fought for a balanced budget amendment, for lower taxes, and against wasteful government spending. We can trust Mike to continue fighting to ensure our small business owners, farmers, ranchers, producers, INL workers, and rural community members have a voice in Congress. I urge voters to join me in standing with Mike.”
Superintendent of Public Instruction Debbie Critchfield
“Education is a top priority for our communities, and having a representative who fights against federal overreach is critical. Congressman Mike Simpson has proven he is a strong advocate for Idaho’s parents and teachers by pushing back against D.C. centric policies. He believes in ‘Idaho solutions for Idaho schools,’ and that is why he has my full support for re-election. I hope you’ll join me in supporting him.”
Former Governor C.L. “Butch” Otter
“Mike is a man of integrity and has proven to be the conservative leader we need in Congress representing Idaho. Mike understands agriculture and has always fought for our farmers, ranchers and producers, especially when it comes to the overreaching EPA. He protects our gun rights, votes to lower taxes, supports a balanced budget amendment, and continues to fight the liberal policies of the far-left. We need Mike in Congress to continue to fight for Idaho families. I’m proud to endorse Congressman Mike Simpson and chair his re-election campaign.”
“Mike Simpson’s integrity, intellect, and common-sense conservative voice is exactly what’s needed in Washington. Mike is an incredible partner to the House Republican Leadership team as we fight to take back the House in 2022, and he’s raised millions of dollars for House Republicans over his career ensuring that conservatives are elected to Congress. I’m proud to support Mike because of his strong leadership in Washington. He can always be counted on to uphold the Constitution and to fight for our conservative values. He’s a Congressman Idaho can be proud of.”
National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund (NRA – PVF)
“Congressman Mike Simpson is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment in Idaho. He can always be counted on to defend pro-gun policies through his leadership on the Appropriations Committee and the NRA thanks him for his longstanding support of the right to keep and bear arms.” “I am honored to once again receive the endorsement of the National Rifle Association,” said Congressman Mike Simpson. “Now, more than ever, it is important to defend our constitutional rights, and I am proud to have the support of an organization that works hard to protect those rights.”
National Association of Home Builders
“Rep. Simpson has consistently demonstrated that he is a champion of housing and has pushed to advance policies that will help ease the nation’s housing affordability crisis, put families in homes, create jobs and spur economic growth. We are proud to endorse Rep. Simpson for re-election because he opposes needless regulatory mandates that increase housing costs, while working with home builders to provide more safe and affordable housing for hardworking American families.”
“National Right to Life is pleased to endorse you for re-election to the U.S. House. We commend you for your 100% pro-life voting record in the 117th Congress. When they go to the polls, voters who are concerned about the right to life and the protection of the vulnerable should take note that you voted for pro-life policies to safeguard the lives of unborn babies and their mothers. You oppose using tax dollars to pay for abortions, and you voted to preserve the longstanding Hyde Amendment, which bars federal tax dollars from being used for abortions in many federal programs. The Hyde Amendment has saved an estimated 2.5 million lives since its first passage in 1976. You voted against the so-called Women’s Health Protection Act, which really should be called “Abortion Without Limits Until Birth Act” because it would enshrine abortion in federal law and policies, and it would tear down pro-life protections on the state level including parental involvement and informed consent laws. This endorsement reflects your strong pro-life record and your commitment to building a culture of life in Washington and throughout our nation. We look forward to continuing to work with you to protect vulnerable members of the human family – unborn children and their mothers, the elderly, the medically dependent, and persons with disabilities – who are threatened by abortion or euthanasia.”
“The U.S. Chamber and our members are committed to supporting candidates for public office who champion job creators and the employees, families, and communities they serve. We know that strong leaders in Washington are critical to addressing economic challenges, accelerating our recovery, and promoting opportunity. Rep. Mike Simpson has demonstrated a commitment to supporting free enterprise and the American business community through pro-growth solutions, and he has earned the political support of the business community. The U.S. Chamber is proud to endorse Rep. Simpson, and we look forward”
Advanced · 63,448 votes (63%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 390 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $757K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 378 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $504.6K.
Total reported receipts $1,409,212
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
30% of the money placed by state came from inside Idaho: $152.2K of $504.6K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 114 contributions · 30% | $152,150 |
| 32 contributions · 16% | $81,250 |
| 74 contributions · 14% | $69,550 |
| 73 contributions · 11% | $54,050 |
| 27 contributions · 5.2% | $26,350 |
| 10 contributions · 3.3% | $16,600 |
| 5 contributions · 3% | $15,000 |
| 6 contributions · 2.8% | $14,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 22 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 40 contributions · 21% of ranked | $103,600 |
| Written instead of an employer · 30 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $46,750 |
| 4 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 11 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $11,600 |
| 9 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $9,750 |
| 4 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $9,300 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $300 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,248) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
No outside spending filed
The campaign also refunded $300 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $868,299
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 670 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
33 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $199,682 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 payments · 11% of all spending | $130,915 |
| 17 payments · 11% of all spending | $130,789 |
| 2 payments · 11% of all spending | $130,000 |
| 18 payments · 7.6% of all spending | $92,673 |
| 16 payments · 6% of all spending | $73,000 |
| 18 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $39,292 |
| 21 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $30,846 |
| 7 payments · 2% of all spending | $23,992 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 40 contributions · 21% of ranked | $103,600 |
| 58 contributions · 13% of ranked | $66,350 |
| 25 contributions · 8.6% of ranked | $43,250 |
| 20 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $28,750 |
| 17 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $20,750 |
| 19 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $19,850 |
| 25 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $17,750 |
| 17 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $15,750 |
A further $300 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,248) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.