Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-40 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CA-40
Representative since 1993
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
14 priorities from calvert.house.gov, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The American farmer is an integral part of country's fabric and remains an essential member of communities across the nation. Additionally, the world renowned California agriculture industry is one of the most significant contributors to our state's economic engine.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
The Constitution requires the federal government to “provide for the common defense.” The ability of the armed forces of the United States to defend our nation, deter aggressors, and win wars should deterrence fail must not be compromised. A strong military is an essential component of maintaining the prosperity and freedom of American citizens. As Chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, my top priority is the defense of our nation and way of life.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
I fully recognize that the future of America is linked to the successful education of our children. While public education has traditionally been a right and responsibility of states and local communities, federal funding and control has increased over recent years. As a result there has been a growing debate on whether federal involvement in education, and the billions in federal spending that comes with it, is actually improving educational opportunity.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
The energy challenges facing our nation continue to pose a significant burden on American families as well as our domestic economic security. To meet our energy needs, our country must take action on multiple policy fronts.
In the short term, we must reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy by increasing domestic production of American resources. In the long term, we must make significant investments that will help our country lead the world in the development and production of energy efficient and renewable energy technologies.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
In 2006, the Los Angeles Times published a story alleging Rep. Calvert had personally benefitted from a federal funding request. The story falsely stated that the request was for a freeway interchange near property Rep. Calvert owned and later sold and alleged the sale experienced a higher profit because of the federal funds obtained for the interchange.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
With premiums rising, deductibles increasing, and health care choices decreasing, American families know all too well that we must find health care solutions that increase access to care and lower costs. That's exactly why I am working with my colleagues to advance patient-centered health care solutions. Any reforms to our health care policies will continue to protect American families by ensuring people with pre-existing conditions are not denied heath care policies and allowing the coverage of dependents until they are 26 years old.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
The security of our homeland is under threat if we fail to secure the southern border and fix our broken immigration system.
First and foremost, we must have control of our border. America is a nation of immigrants, but we are a beacon of hope throughout the world because we respect and enforce the rule of law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
I understand the impact of a stagnant job market on my constituents and on hard-working Americans across the country, and am committed to working with my colleagues – on both sides of the aisle – to advance long-term, pro-growth policies that get our economy growing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
As a former small business owner, I recognize that small business is the engine of job growth in our country and the backbone of our economy. Small businesses employ more than 50 percent of the private work-force, generate half of the nation's gross domestic product and are the principal source of new jobs in the U.S. economy. The federal government's job is not to stifle the prosperity of these businesses through an onerous tax and regulatory system but to stay out of the way so that the transactions of a free market may take place.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
I have always been, and will continue to be, dedicated to working toward a solution so that all who have paid into the Social Security system will benefit fairly.
As it has become increasingly obvious that Social Security will go bankrupt without action, Congress has been working to find a solution. While we continue to work to protect and preserve Social Security for the beneficiaries now on the roles and those near retirement, we must also seek out innovative solutions for the millions of younger Americans who will one day rely on the program.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
For too long government has assumed that a percentage of an individual's income is owed to them. However, I believe that it is the government who is beholden to the people. Individuals should expect results from the hard earned money that they turn over every year to the federal government. Everyone who works hard deserves to keep the money they earn and, in turn, spend or save as they see fit. By letting the people keep more of their income, they are able to spend more on goods and services thereby contributing to a robust national economy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
The 41st Congressional District encompasses some of the fastest growing communities in the nation. As is often the case, population growth has been closely followed by increased demands on transportation infrastructure. The Inland Empire region, which consists of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, was recently bestowed the dubious distinction of having the highest commuting cost in the nation. Just last year, another study determined that residents of the city of Riverside had the unhealthiest commute in America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · calvert.house.gov/issues
Heading as listed on calvert.house.gov/issues ↗ (opens calvert.house.gov/issues at this heading)
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 17 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Calvert’s 65 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00257337
90¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($6.3M of $7.1M). Cash on hand went from $1.4M on Mar 31, 2025 to $980.4K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $1,300,682 | $188,190 | $1,374,628 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,341,320 | $218,247 | $2,497,702 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $698,996 | $251,567 | $2,945,131 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $1,152,646 | $680,894 | $3,416,882 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $751,596 | $432,257 | $3,736,222 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $469,562 | $1,848,765 | $2,357,019 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $427,667 | $1,287,685 | $1,497,001 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $700,068 | $565,896 | $1,631,173 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $207,846 | $858,629 | $980,391 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
125 endorsers listed on Ken Calvert’s own campaign site: 1 party, 93 officials, 1 union, 13 organizations, 17 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Riverside County Sheriff
Riverside County District Attorney
“I am proud to endorse Ken Calvert because he supports local law enforcement and understands the importance of maintaining law and order," said Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco. "Ken is a vocal opponent of the soft-on-crime laws backed by radical California liberals, like Will Rollins. Voters who are concerned about public safety have a clear choice in Ken Calvert." "Ken Calvert is a public safety advocate who always has the back of Riverside County law enforcement. Ken has my full support because of his proven record supporting law and order," said Riverside County District Attorney Mike Hestrin. "We need more people like Ken in office who will stand up against the soft-on-crime policies that are making California a more dangerous place for families to live.”
State Senator
State Senator
Assemblymember
Assemblymember , Chairman of Reform California
Assemblymember
Assemblymember
The Lincoln Club of Orange County
“Earning the endorsement of the Lincoln Club of Orange County is an extraordinary honor and continues to build on the momentum of my campaign in the new 40th District,” said Calvert. “This endorsement reflects my established record as a proven conservative who has consistently supported President Trump and Republican causes throughout the region, state and country. I look forward to working with the Lincoln Club of Orange County this year to win my election, pass a Voter ID initiative, and restore common sense in California.”
The Lincoln Club of Riverside County
“I am honored to receive the endorsement of the Lincoln Club of Riverside County," said Congressman Ken Calvert. "Now more than ever, Riverside County needs a proven conservative fighter who will stand up for our taxpayers, protect our small businesses, and work hand-in-hand with President Trump to secure our borders and unleash a rip-roaring economy for American families. I am committed to President Trump's America First agenda, which means prioritizing fiscal responsibility, ending regulatory overreach, securing our borders, and ensuring our national security is second to none. Together, we”
“Ken Calvert’s experience and deep-policy knowledge are a key asset for his constituency in Riverside County, CA,” said LCR President Charles T. Moran. “Currently serving as a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, Ken is primed to bring effective, dedicated and experienced leadership. Log Cabin Republicans is proud to endorse Ken in his reelection campaign to represent California’s 41st congressional district knowing that he will continue to support our military, improve our local and national economies, strengthen our borders, reform our broken immigration system, and protect individual liberties.”
Republican Candidate for Governor
“Congressman Ken Calvert has been a strong and consistent fighter for California’s job creators, entrepreneurs, and innovators for decades,” said Steve Hilton. "I’m proud to endorse him in the 40th Congressional District because we need leaders in Washington who understand how to grow our economy, bring down costs, and make life more affordable. I look forward to working with Ken as a vital partner in my effort to transform California’s business climate and put our state back in front for high-tech manufacturing.”
Ambassador
Chief Speechwriter to President Ronald Reagan
former National Security Advisor to President Donald Trump
Chairwoman, Lincoln Club of OC
Secretary, Lincoln Club of OC
Not yet called · 100% reporting · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,136 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.2M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 6 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 42 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $2.1M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 580 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.5M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $7,050,383
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
28% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $615.5K of $2.2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 776 contributions · 28% | $615,466 |
| 258 contributions · 18% | $396,750 |
| 179 contributions · 9.1% | $203,188 |
| 130 contributions · 7.6% | $168,950 |
| 81 contributions · 5.2% | $116,410 |
| 94 contributions · 5.2% | $115,718 |
| 95 contributions · 3.8% | $83,369 |
| 45 contributions · 2.9% | $63,844 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 49 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 760 contributions · 21% of ranked | $338,143 |
| 9 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $26,000 |
| 6 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 7 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 7 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $19,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $16,900 |
| 10 contributions · 1% of ranked | $16,250 |
| 6 contributions · 1% of ranked | $15,000 |
A further $115,602 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($296,280) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $46,949 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $5,328,180
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,439 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
43 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $432,227 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 payments · 40% of all spending | $2,557,369 |
| 8 payments · 12% of all spending | $755,999 |
| 38 payments · 7.4% of all spending | $467,320 |
| 6 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $208,271 |
| 28 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $148,451 |
| 2 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $95,540 |
| 12 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $76,484 |
| 18 payments · 1% of all spending | $63,277 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 867 contributions · 17% of ranked | $371,621 |
| 176 contributions · 13% of ranked | $276,739 |
| 102 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $150,050 |
| 76 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $146,400 |
| 62 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $124,916 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 21 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $51,657 |
| 27 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $41,558 |
| 44 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $38,630 |
A further $30,399 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($296,280) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.