Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MI-03 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, MI-03
Representative since 2023
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
9 priorities from hillaryscholten.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The American healthcare system features some of the world’s greatest advancements in technology and pharmaceutical research, but for too many the system is broken. Nobody should have to rely on charity or a kickstarter for cancer treatment. No parent should have to make the choice of putting food on the table or paying for a prescription for their child.
In Congress, I am hard at work to find common-sense solutions to bring down the costs of healthcare and lower the cost of prescription drugs. I support policies that will ban insurance companies from raising rates on people when they get sick, denying people coverage for having a pre-existing condition or dropping them when they get sick. I am committed to preventing insurance companies from increasing premiums and deductibles while reducing coverage. I will continue to fight for paid family and medical leave, so when someone is sick, they stay home and keep us all safe. I vote to cap the cost of critical prescription drugs and insulin, and I defend the Affordable Care Act and work every day to expand on it.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · hillaryscholten.com/priorities
As a woman, a mother, and a person of deep faith, I approach the issue of reproductive healthcare and freedom with the utmost reverence, thoughtfulness, and respect for the issues involved. That’s why I fundamentally believe that the choice of when and how to become a mother, or how to handle a complicated or life-threatening pregnancy belongs with women themselves, and not detached politicians. I will always protect a woman’s right to choose.
For the first time in our lifetimes we have watched the Supreme Court take rights away. Now that Roe v. Wade has been overturned, we’re seeing every day exactly what that right protected for the last 50 years– a 10-year-old rape victim being denied the healthcare her doctors recommend, women forced to go into sepsis with a miscarriage, individuals with autoimmune disorders not being able to access the gold standard medication they need. In Michigan, in particular, our healthcare is uniquely vulnerable. Over the last year we’ve gone through a whiplash of watching our protections be taken away, and then reinstated in the courts here in Michigan.
Protecting reproductive health care choices is fundamentally a matter of privacy and freedom from government control. It is a kitchen table issue, a worker’s rights issue, a child welfare issue, and a healthcare worker protection issue. As the first mom and woman to ever represent this district in Congress, I promise that I will always be a steadfast supporter of a woman’s God-given ability to make her own healthcare decisions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · hillaryscholten.com/priorities
We can – and we must – continue fighting to create well-paying jobs with good benefits in West Michigan. As Americans are getting squeezed with higher prices, we need to do everything we can to put money back in Michiganders’ pockets.
That means we need to lower the cost of prescription drugs so people can keep more of their paychecks. We need to invest in renewable energy – and tap our nation’s oil reserves right now – to bring down the cost of energy. We need to invest in Michigan’s semiconductor manufacturing capability and stand up to China when they threaten our global supply chain, so we can control costs by making things in Michigan.
Building an economy that works for everyone means investing in the small businesses that fuel our West Michigan economy, especially as they work to recover from the devastating impact of COVID-19. It means investing in our infrastructure, making sure Michigan gets its fair share of road money, and fixing our roads the right way. And it means fighting for fair wages and the right for workers to collectively bargain.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · hillaryscholten.com/priorities
My mom was a special education teacher in Grand Rapids Public Schools – growing up, I saw what a good, public education could mean, especially for families struggling to get by. As a mom of two school-aged kids myself now, I see firsthand every day how important it is that we refocus our efforts to build up our classrooms. These last three years have left some kids an entire grade level (or more) behind and our teachers strained.
That’s why I will never stop working to strengthen Michigan public schools to make sure our students are prepared and ready to engage in a 21st-century economy. I will always work to make sure our highly skilled and talented educators are compensated fairly and get the support they need to equip our kids with the fundamentals they need to be successful. I support opportunities for learning from pre-k to affordable college for those who wish to attend. I prioritize creating and expanding job training, apprenticeship programs, and skilled trade programs so that Michiganders who don’t go to college can get the skills they need to work hard and get a good paying job.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · hillaryscholten.com/priorities
As the daughter of a public school teacher and local newspaperman, I don’t have to look far to see a generation of Michiganders who worked a lifetime paying into Social Security and Medicare expecting the benefits to be there when they needed them. We have to live up to that promise. I oppose efforts to raise the retirement age, or to cut or privatize our social safety net. Instead, I advocate for making these programs more efficient by cracking down on waste, fraud, and abuse, and letting Medicare negotiate the cost of drug prices.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · hillaryscholten.com/priorities
Part of what makes Michigan so great is our Great Lakes, great outdoors, and beautiful natural resources. I come from a long line of conservationists, and we are a camping, hiking, and fishing family. Being good stewards of the environment means both creating jobs and keeping our state – and our families – safe from dangerous pollution. In Congress, protecting our drinking water from PFAS and other toxic chemicals is a top priority. I am fighting to curb climate change before it’s too late, and I stand firmly in defense of our Great Lakes. I am proud to lead the charge to invest in a new energy economy with tax credits for renewable energy innovations to create good paying jobs while reducing our reliance on foreign oil and lowering the cost of energy for all of us.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · hillaryscholten.com/priorities
Every Michigander knows that our roads are a danger to our safety and a strain on our pocketbooks. In Congress, I am working to get the standards and weight limits for our Michigan roads in line with the rest of the country; advocate for Michigan’s fair share of road funding from the federal government; make sure the roads get fixed the right way, with the right materials. The first time.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · hillaryscholten.com/priorities
The right to vote and the integrity of our elections–the very foundations of our democracy–are under attack. It has never been of greater consequence that we stand up against these attacks by passing federal legislation to secure our democracy and defend the right to vote, including: ending voter suppression and expanding vote-by-mail and early-vote nationwide; ending partisan gerrymandering; and protecting against attempts to subvert or overturn the results of our elections.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · hillaryscholten.com/priorities
I believe that the primary role of a Member of Congress is to represent the American people. While the vast majority of Americans support common-sense gun reform measures, we continue to see no action from Republican leaders. Our elected officials have the power to take action — it’s time they use it.
As a mother of two young boys, I won’t accept this new normal of active shooter drills in our schools and senseless gun violence in our country. I’m proud to have been recognized by Moms Demand Action as a Gun Sense Candidate for my commitment to common-sense gun safety reforms like universal background checks, safe gun storage laws, and red flag laws.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · hillaryscholten.com/priorities
94% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 41 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Small Business
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Scholten’s 62 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00711317
61¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.9M of $3M). Cash on hand went from $500.8K on Mar 31, 2025 to $1.5M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $320,257 | $169,204 | $500,768 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $363,294 | $130,391 | $733,671 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $402,323 | $169,509 | $966,486 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $391,941 | $258,394 | $1,100,033 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $404,222 | $299,425 | $1,204,830 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $405,521 | $214,546 | $1,395,805 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $41,564 | $80,796 | $1,356,573 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $610,552 | $448,723 | $1,518,402 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $94,764 | $81,394 | $1,531,772 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4,822 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.4M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 482 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $885.8K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 4 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 7 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $57.1K.
Total reported receipts $3,034,438
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
60% of the money placed by state came from inside Michigan: $832.1K of $1.4M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,029 contributions · 60% | $832,065 |
| 92 contributions · 6.5% | $89,994 |
| 66 contributions · 5.7% | $79,260 |
| 150 contributions · 5.6% | $76,810 |
| 74 contributions · 4.9% | $67,595 |
| 113 contributions · 3.2% | $43,430 |
| 54 contributions · 2.8% | $38,176 |
| 48 contributions · 2.1% | $28,900 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 37 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 3,255 contributions · 50% of ranked | $644,113 |
| Written instead of an employer · 154 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $86,740 |
| 36 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $28,625 |
| 23 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $18,600 |
| 13 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $12,100 |
| 4 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $9,500 |
| 7 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 2 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $14,820 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($208,905) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $20,047 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,375,021
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,325 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
69 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $265,296 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 140 payments · 20% of all spending | $378,540 |
| 5 payments · 9.7% of all spending | $180,020 |
| 46 payments · 8.5% of all spending | $158,003 |
| 54 payments · 8.3% of all spending | $153,757 |
| 92 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $45,490 |
| 23 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $41,211 |
| 1 payment · 2% of all spending | $37,500 |
| 12 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $30,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 3,029 contributions · 41% of ranked | $549,503 |
| 212 contributions · 10% of ranked | $140,067 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 233 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $98,310 |
| 108 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $36,943 |
| 30 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $28,340 |
| 13 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $24,700 |
| 34 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $20,442 |
| 45 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $19,530 |
A further $14,820 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($208,905) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.