Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-09 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, CA-09
Representative since 2019
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
11 priorities from harderforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Josh knows the price of everything from gas to rent to groceries is way too high right now and our families can’t afford it. Josh is leading the fight to cut the cost of prescription drugs like insulin, repeal the gas taxes in both Washington and Sacramento, and get housing costs under control.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Health care is personal for Josh. His brother was born prematurely and the hospital left his family with a hundred page medical bill. Josh knows the health care system is broken. It’s too hard to find care and too expensive to get the care you need. At the same time, Insurance executives are getting rich while our families have to choose between prescriptions and putting gas in the tank. Josh supports measures to get costs down including a $35 per month cap on insulin. He’s also working to bring more doctors to the Valley so people can get care more quickly and closer to home.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Josh has a jobs-first vision of turning our Valley into a thriving economic center. He knows that right now too many people are stuck in traffic driving to good-paying jobs hours from home. And too many young people are leaving the Valley because they don’t believe we have enough opportunities. That’s why he’s working to bring high paying jobs in fields like ag-tech, IT, and clean energy home to our community, and why he’s fighting for trade deals that put our products and workers at the center, as opposed to being ripped off by foreign competitors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Politicians have let the homelessness crisis spiral out of control. Josh knows it is an emergency and he supports urgent programs to get people off the streets and into support services. Josh’s landmark homelessness plan includes tackling the root causes of homelessness by investing in mental health and substance abuse services and providing job training to get people back on their feet.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Josh is incredibly concerned with rising crime rates in our community. Like every parent, he wants to walk around with his daughter at night knowing they’re safe in their neighborhood. Josh is proud to stand with our law enforcement officers and give them the tools they need to keep us safe. This year he brought home millions in federal dollars to fund a special task force to fight methamphetamine and fentanyl trafficking in the Valley and hire new police officers, buy new police cars, and stand up state of the art public safety equipment. Because of that work, he has been endorsed by the largest law enforcement organization in the state.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Our community has had the same politicians yelling at each other about the same problems forever and nothing ever gets fixed. Corruption and inaction have become the norm. Josh is part of a new generation who believes we need to do things differently. Josh is the author of the Ban Corporate PACs Act because his vote can’t be bought and he believes no one should be able to auction their vote to the highest bidder. He is fighting to stop pay raises and special privileges for politicians. And he is a leader on reforming campaign finance so elected officials put families, not corporations, first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Both of Josh’s grandfathers and one of his great uncles served in uniform. They defused bombs on the beaches of Normandy and fought in the South Pacific to defend our freedom. Josh understands the sacrifices our military men and women make and he knows our veterans don’t always get the benefits they’ve earned when they return home. One of Josh’s proudest moments was when his bill providing health care to 30,000 Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent Orange was signed into law. Josh won’t stop fighting until every single one of our veterans have the benefits they’ve earned.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Josh knows our country draws its strength from our diversity. Here in the Valley over 10,000 Dreamers are stuck in the shadows. Josh is a proud co-sponsor of the DREAM Act and believes they must have a pathway to citizenship. He also believes we can’t just stop there – Josh is a vocal advocate for real, comprehensive immigration reform to give immigrants and their families the protections they need to participate fully in our community. Josh also knows strong border security and enhanced technology are vital for protecting our country from drug smugglers and human traffickers. He believes both border security and immigration reform are important pieces to our country’s success.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Water has been a critical issue for our community since Josh’s great great grandfather began farming in Manteca more than 150 years ago. Josh knows water is the lifeblood of the Valley. That’s why he’s fighting to stop the Delta Tunnel water grab that would ship our Valley’s water to Los Angeles, work alongside Republicans and Democrats to build new water storage projects, and protect the Delta. Farmers and ranchers across the Valley support Josh because he’s delivered on his word to protect and preserve our water.
“The Delta is the lifeblood for the valley and everything we do. It’s our economy’s livelihood. For too long, politicians in Sacramento and Washington have haggled over our water crisis instead of working to solve it. Unlike them, I’ll always protect our water and stand tall against anyone trying to ship it away.”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Josh is a proud product of Valley public schools and is incredibly grateful for the great education he received. Like so many parents in our community, Josh is deeply concerned about what the pandemic has done to our kids. That’s why he spoke out early and often to get kids back in classrooms once it was safe and he’s working hard to direct more funding for our kids’ mental health. Josh is also a strong proponent of trade and skills education so every kid can graduate with a career ahead of them whether they plan on going to college or not.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
Josh believes climate change is an existential threat to our way of life. Catastrophic wildfires. Historic droughts. Polluted air and water. That’s why Josh introduced the FARM Act, a landmark climate change bill that supports Valley farmers in the fight against climate change. The bill is one of the only bills in Congress backed by both the leading environmental and agricultural groups.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · harderforcongress.com/issues
94% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 38 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Harder’s 112 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00639146
31¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.4M of $4.5M). Cash on hand went from $2.3M on Mar 31, 2025 to $4.8M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $734,686 | $145,298 | $2,278,219 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $814,632 | $192,567 | $2,900,285 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $702,382 | $181,113 | $3,421,554 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $498,206 | $151,801 | $3,767,958 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $374,017 | $186,294 | $3,955,682 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $590,583 | $118,988 | $4,427,277 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $369,022 | $56,811 | $4,739,488 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $363,269 | $343,513 | $4,759,245 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $43,604 | $20,157 | $4,782,692 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Advanced · 79,946 votes (61%) · 1 of 5 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 5,051 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.6M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 304 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $573.2K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 5 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 17 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $141.5K.
Total reported receipts $4,490,401
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
80% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $2M of $2.6M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,485 contributions · 80% | $2,042,032 |
| 82 contributions · 4.2% | $106,695 |
| 111 contributions · 3.2% | $82,200 |
| 26 contributions · 1.3% | $33,843 |
| 32 contributions · 1.3% | $33,400 |
| 40 contributions · 1.3% | $32,325 |
| 20 contributions · 1.2% | $30,875 |
| 39 contributions · 1% | $25,900 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 38 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,968 contributions · 50% of ranked | $1,147,785 |
| Written instead of an employer · 457 contributions · 12% of ranked | $267,783 |
| 44 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $30,500 |
| 18 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $28,150 |
| 7 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $16,650 |
| 5 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 12 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 5 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $14,363 |
A further $42,693 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($423,535) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $57,368 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,003,731
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 907 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
45 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $108,704 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 61 payments · 15% of all spending | $204,678 |
| 73 payments · 12% of all spending | $163,012 |
| 31 payments · 7.8% of all spending | $109,589 |
| 102 payments · 6.5% of all spending | $91,297 |
| 8 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $52,193 |
| 20 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $46,038 |
| 10 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $38,529 |
| 7 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $33,650 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,645 contributions · 38% of ranked | $933,747 |
| 263 contributions · 8.2% of ranked | $204,528 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 314 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $185,538 |
| 25 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $57,500 |
| 175 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $55,967 |
| 26 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $53,875 |
| 64 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $46,276 |
| 55 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $31,325 |
A further $42,693 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($423,535) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.