Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NE-01 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, NE-01
Representative since 2022
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
9 priorities from mikefloodfornebraska.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
I’m working every day to help Nebraskans keep more of their paychecks and make life more affordable. I voted to cut taxes for Nebraska families. I voted to pass No Tax on Tips, No Tax on Overtime, and No Tax on Social Security. We have more work to do, and I will continue backing policies that grow our economy and make life more affordable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikefloodfornebraska.com/getting-things-done
A secure southern border is vital to the safety of our country. I voted to pass legislation that funds Border Patrol, improves our border security technology, and fights fentanyl coming into our country. We have achieved the most secure border in 50 years. I will continue supporting policies that keep our border secure and our communities safe.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikefloodfornebraska.com/getting-things-done
I launched Nebraska Backs the Blue, a bipartisan coalition of public safety officials and community leaders dedicated to strengthening support for law enforcement and recruiting more officers to Nebraska. In Congress, I will always support the law enforcement officers who sacrifice for the safety of Nebraskans.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikefloodfornebraska.com/getting-things-done
Communist China is one of our greatest threats. The Chinese Communist Party steals our technology, spies on our military, and is buying up American farmland. I voted to invest $150 billion to strengthen our military and bolster our deterrence against China. I’ve also worked to keep Chinese technology off Nebraska cell towers and stop the CCP from purchasing our farmland. As the threat of Communist China grows, I will keep fighting to protect our national security.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikefloodfornebraska.com/getting-things-done
Our national debt will hit $40 trillion later this year. Washington’s spending is out of control, and addressing this crisis has proven to be a monstrous task. But our deficit is finally beginning to shrink. I voted for a historic rescission package to rein in Washington’s wasteful spending. I also introduced the No More D.C. Waste Act, targeted legislation going after excessive federal funding. I will keep fighting to get Washington’s excess spending under control.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikefloodfornebraska.com/getting-things-done
The cost of owning a home has become too expensive. The average age of a first-time homebuyer is now 40 – but for years, Congress has done nothing to address rising home prices. I worked with Republicans and Democrats to pass a bipartisan bill to address high housing costs. My bill cuts red tape and makes it more affordable to build new homes. It is a huge step in making the American Dream more affordable for Nebraska families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikefloodfornebraska.com/getting-things-done
I was elected by my colleagues to serve as Chair of the Main Street Caucus, a group of more than 90+ commonsense Republicans focused on delivering results. In this role, I’ve worked with President Trump and congressional leaders to advance policies that benefit Nebraskans: cutting taxes, reducing red tape, and eliminating wasteful spending.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikefloodfornebraska.com/getting-things-done
Nebraska is the best place in the world because of our communities. I have secured more than $100 million in federal funding for community projects in Nebraska. These funds will go toward improving public safety, investing in infrastructure, and making our communities an even better place to live.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikefloodfornebraska.com/getting-things-done
My job in Washington is to fight for Nebraska. When a hiring freeze at the Omaha National Weather Service office paused critical weather balloon launches, I took the issue to the White House and pushed for a fix. They addressed the staffing shortage, launches resumed, and Nebraska communities once again have the accurate forecasting they rely on to stay safe.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mikefloodfornebraska.com/getting-things-done
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 14 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Financial Services
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Flood’s 47 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00801241
77¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($2.1M of $2.8M). Cash on hand went from $362.8K on Mar 31, 2025 to $859.9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $266,954 | $124,978 | $362,759 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $493,477 | $165,646 | $690,589 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $442,381 | $113,308 | $1,019,662 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $351,555 | $175,626 | $1,195,591 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $398,074 | $184,732 | $1,408,933 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 22, 2026 | $34,991 | $108,079 | $1,335,845 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $381,477 | $156,572 | $1,560,751 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $364,023 | $702,818 | $1,221,956 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $37,928 | $399,979 | $859,905 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Advanced · 51,471 votes (100%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 580 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.3M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 813 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 7 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $156.3K.
Total reported receipts $2,770,861
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
61% of the money placed by state came from inside Nebraska: $616.9K of $1M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 476 contributions · 61% | $616,931 |
| 23 contributions · 4.6% | $46,670 |
| 35 contributions · 4% | $40,500 |
| 22 contributions · 3.5% | $35,000 |
| 30 contributions · 2.8% | $28,250 |
| 21 contributions · 2.7% | $27,500 |
| 21 contributions · 2.3% | $23,500 |
| 14 contributions · 2.1% | $21,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 43 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 90 contributions · 13% of ranked | $109,730 |
| Written instead of an employer · 25 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $31,250 |
| Written instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 3% of ranked | $24,500 |
| 9 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 9 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $11,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $10,500 |
A further $39,398 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($37,878) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $6,501 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,352,612
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 575 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
10 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $30,763 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 16% of all spending | $344,332 |
| 26 payments · 9.8% of all spending | $208,405 |
| 35 payments · 7.2% of all spending | $152,832 |
| 1 payment · 4.3% of all spending | $91,256 |
| 1 payment · 2.1% of all spending | $45,492 |
| 1 payment · 2% of all spending | $41,950 |
| 11 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $35,818 |
| 18 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $33,131 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 90 contributions · 11% of ranked | $110,230 |
| 56 contributions · 11% of ranked | $101,800 |
| 45 contributions · 7.4% of ranked | $71,355 |
| 107 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $53,600 |
| 27 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $32,750 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $28,000 |
| 15 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $27,250 |
| 20 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $23,000 |
A further $44,898 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($37,878) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.