Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NE-01 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, NE-01
Has not served in Congress
7 priorities from backnebraska.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
We spend twice as much on healthcare as other developed countries — yet too many Nebraskans can’t see a doctor or afford a prescription. We are the only industrialized nation without universal healthcare.
The Affordable Care Act moved us forward, but we need to go further. We can achieve universal coverage with common sense reforms
My priorities include:
- Enact a true public option to guarantee universal coverage and force insurance companies to compete by offering lower prices and better coverage
- Extend the ACA premium tax credits to lower monthly costs for millions of families.
- Restore Medicaid funding and protect rural hospitals
- Lower the Medicare eligibility age to 60
- Take on Big Pharma to lower prescription drug costs
- Protect a woman’s right to choose in Nebraska and nationwide
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · backnebraska.com/making-healthcare-affordable-accessible
Congress has failed time and again to fix our broken immigration system because of partisan gridlock. That failure has real consequences for businesses that need workers, families who live in fear of separation, and communities seeking stability and growth. I will work to repair our immigration system, uphold our values, and fight for comprehensive reform that is fair, humane, and effective.
My priorities include:
- Claw back nearly $75 billion in excess funding from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and prohibit the use of any federal funds to detain children
- Ensure strong security at the southern border while enforcing immigration laws in ways that reflect our values and are consistent with the U.S. Constitution
- Pass comprehensive immigration reform that creates a genuine pathway to citizenship and keeps families together
- Refocus Department of Homeland Security on its core mission by limiting unilateral expansions of detention facilities and restricting operations to the enforcement of immigration law
- Reform the current agriculture workforce system to better support hardworking farmworkers and family farmers, ranchers, and producers
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · backnebraska.com/smart-fair-immigration-and-a-secure-border
Nebraska’s First District is home to Offutt Air Force Base, U.S. Strategic Command, and thousands of servicemembers, veterans, and military families. National security is not abstract here — it’s personal.
With 21 years of national security experience, I am the most qualified candidate in this race to strengthen America’s security and protect our interests abroad.
My priorities include:
- Maintain a strong national defense to deter threats, protect U.S. interests, and ensure global security
- Strengthen our international alliances through principled diplomacy
- Avoid forever wars by reasserting Congressional war powers to authorize military actions and prevent unilateral presidential war-making
- Reverse harmful cuts to the VA so veterans receive the disability services, mental health care, and timely claims processing they have earned
- Expand veteran entrepreneurship programs, strengthen veteran hiring initiatives, and increase housing assistance so veterans and their families can put down roots in Nebraska
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · backnebraska.com/restoring-american-leadership-national-security
Nebraska’s prosperity depends on a strong, resilient rural economy. But political fights, reckless trade decisions, and corporate consolidation have pushed family farms to the brink and hollowed out rural communities. Protecting Nebraska’s future means strengthening the agricultural roots of our state and giving rural communities the tools to grow and prosper.
My priorities include:
- End the tariff chaos that harms farmers and raises consumer costs
- Pass a long-term, bipartisan Farm Bill that is updated to reflect the current demands of family farms
- Expand markets for biofuels, including through permanent, year-long sales of E15
- Break up agribusiness monopolies that squeeze family farms and prevent competitive markets
- Fight for fair trade policies that allow U.S. producers to compete globally
- Expand rural broadband so every community can thrive in the 21st century
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · backnebraska.com/supporting-agriculture-rural-communities
What keeps me up at night is what keeps so many Nebraska families up at night: the skyrocketing cost of living. Housing, healthcare, childcare — all slipping out of reach. And saving for the future? Nearly impossible.
We need an economy that works for the people who make it run, not just those at the top. That means tackling prices where families feel it most and rebuilding a true middle class.
My priorities include:
- Roll back tariffs that are hurting Nebraska’s farmers and driving up costs for producers and consumers
- Expand the Child Tax Credit to put more money back in families’ pockets
- Rebalance the tax code so that billionaires and corporations pay their fair share
- Cut red tape that delays housing projects and puts families in houses instead of investment firms
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · backnebraska.com/lowering-costs-restoring-the-middle-class
Washington has become a place where too many politicians serve themselves instead of the people. We need real reforms to restore trust and protect our democracy.
My priorities include:
- Enact term limits for members of Congress and the judiciary branch
- Establish mandatory retirement age for the president, members of Congress, and the judiciary
- Ban stock trading by members of Congress
- Overturn Citizens United and end dark money in politics
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · backnebraska.com/ending-washington-dysfunction
For years, Washington politicians have used the national debt as a talking point — except when it comes to endless wars or tax breaks for billionaires. The result? A crushing burden on future generations.
We’ve spent $4 trillion in the last decade on interest alone. With that money, we could have fully funded every K–12 public school for five years, connected every rural community with broadband, or rebuilt every major road and bridge.
Instead, we owe much of it to foreign creditors like China.
We can do great things for our country — but only if we stop mortgaging our kids’ futures for billionaire tax cuts.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · backnebraska.com/reining-in-our-national-debt
FEC filings, Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00925750
69¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($799.4K of $1.2M). Cash on hand went from $125.2K on Dec 31, 2025 to $355.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $157,269 | $32,078 | $125,191 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $169,905 | $85,756 | $209,340 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 22, 2026 | $27,005 | $44,177 | $192,167 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $238,054 | $139,610 | $290,611 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $441,494 | $185,639 | $546,466 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $120,885 | $312,185 | $355,166 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
27 endorsers listed on Chris Backemeyer’s own campaign site: 13 officials, 6 unions, 5 organizations, 3 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Lincoln City Councilmember
Lincoln City Councilmember
State Senator
Lincoln Public Schools Board of Education Member
Lincoln Airport Authority Board Member
Lancaster County Treasurer
Lincoln City Councilmember
U.S. Senator
“I worked at the desk next to Chris Backemeyer at the White House a decade ago and saw him serving our country in some of the highest pressure situations in national security. His experience and dedication to service are what Congress needs in this moment. I know he’ll always put Nebraska families first, and look forward to having him serve alongside me again to work for them and all Americans,” said Senator Andy Kim.”
“I couldn’t be more excited to add Chris Backemeyer to our New Dem ranks. He is running a strong, smart, and issue-focused campaign that puts Nebraska’s First District within reach in November,” said Chair of the New Democrat Action Fund Greg Stanton (AZ-04). “Nebraska voters are hungry for a pragmatic leader like Chris who is focused on driving down costs and getting things done. We are ready to help him run through the tape and win in 35 days.”
Retired Elementary School Principal
Immigration Advocate & Attorney
former Executive Director and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Lincoln and Nebraska
Advanced · 24,713 votes (57%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Lost · 108,538 votes (45%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 656 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $369.3K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 25 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $67K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,154,613
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
47% of the money placed by state came from inside Nebraska: $175.1K of $369.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 318 contributions · 47% | $175,073 |
| 67 contributions · 15% | $56,201 |
| 132 contributions · 15% | $55,022 |
| 32 contributions · 5.8% | $21,425 |
| 29 contributions · 4.2% | $15,330 |
| 5 contributions · 2.4% | $9,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% | $4,500 |
| 9 contributions · 1.1% | $4,020 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 34 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 73 contributions · 20% of ranked | $43,975 |
| 3 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 2 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 6 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $4,319 |
| 3 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $4,000 |
A further $146,605 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($199,601) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $3,778 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $609,075
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 236 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
17 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $16,808 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 payments · 44% of all spending | $348,148 |
| 9 payments · 7.4% of all spending | $59,130 |
| 16 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $46,592 |
| 34 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $23,460 |
| 8 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $20,438 |
| 30 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $15,483 |
| 2 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $11,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 230 contributions · 27% of ranked | $97,537 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 81 contributions · 13% of ranked | $47,018 |
| 46 contributions · 11% of ranked | $38,688 |
| 21 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $14,878 |
| 7 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $10,250 |
| 6 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 4 contributions · 2% of ranked | $7,350 |
A further $2,050 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($199,601) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.