Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TN-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, TN-04
Representative since 2011
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
11 priorities from scottdesjarlais.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Congressman DesJarlais is a firm supporter of an amendment to the Constitution that would require a balanced budget each year. Hard working, law abiding citizens have to live within their means each year and they should expect their government to do the same.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
The economy works best when people and businesses get to keep more of their money and government gets out of the way. Entrepreneurs and hard-working Americans should be rewarded and not punished for their achievements. Our government must live within its means and not burden future generations with debts they cannot hope to pay. Our national debt is a tremendous drag on our economy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
Congressman DesJarlais believes that hard working American should keep more of their earnings rather than send it to Washington for unnecessary spending. He supports tax reductions and simplifications for middle class Americans and job creators. He also supports a reduction in costly, burdensome government regulations that do nothing but increase costs of farmers and small businesses.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
Americans experience the best healthcare at affordable prices when big insurance and big government aren’t meddlesome middlemen interfering in the doctor patient relationship. ObamaCare is not the answer to providing better medical care or reducing costs, but rather amplifies the problems with our current system. We can have an immediate impact on improving healthcare by removing state-by-state restrictions and encouraging national competition among insurers, implementing meaningful tort reform, and creating incentives for the use of healthcare savings account so consumers are better informed and have a financial stake in managing their health.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
As a member of the House Committee on Armed Services, Scott DesJarlais believes in maintaining a strong national defense, protecting American interests both home and abroad, and providing the necessary resources to our men and women who have volunteered to serve. Our military must always be a top priority of the Congress.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
We have an abundance of natural and technological resources in our country and should not be held hostage by foreign energy suppliers or by regulatory agencies in Washington. The process for oil exploration should be streamlined and expedited while we open up more regions of our country for domestic production. Our energy producers should not be overburdened with regulations that drive up prices and limit supply. An “all of the above” responsible approach should utilize our domestic oil and gas supplies, nuclear energy capabilities, coal and hydroelectric production as well as renewable energy efforts.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
Scott DesJarlais believes farmers deserve to have congressional attention paid to the important role they play in providing food sources to this country and the rest of the world. Too often, the Farm Bill – legislation designed to protect and nurture the interests of the agricultural community – has been utilized by liberal special interests in Washington to cover non-agricultural interests at the expense of the farming community. As a member of the House Agriculture Committee, Congressman DesJarlais is consistently recognized as a supporter of returning the committee to a focus on the needs of farmers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
Illegal immigration burdens taxpayers, compromises national security, increases criminal activity, and erodes the significance of being an American citizen. We must secure our border with physical barriers to illegal entry and devote resources to enforcing current immigration law, which includes partnering with state and local law enforcement organizations.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
People and organizations of every political background and persuasion agree on the fiscal reality that Medicare will be broke in ten years. Social Security funds, which were originally designated to be untouchable except for beneficiaries, have been raided year after year by short-sighted politicians of every description. If these programs are not reformed, our present day leadership will have irresponsibly failed to address one of the most crucial challenges faced in our lifetime for our country’s peace and prosperity. We must phase in incremental solutions to give younger generations an opportunity to participate in these programs and to secure their futures, while keeping the promises made to our current seniors 55 and older.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
The right to bear arms is a constitutionally protected right and we will fight to make sure those rights are not eroded. Congressman DesJarlais has an “A” rating from the National Rifle Association (NRA) and will always vote to protect those cherished rights.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
Those who serve and have served in our armed forces should be treated with respect, dignity, and be afforded the resources commiserate with the sacrifices they have made. The promises made to them should be kept and always prioritized.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scottdesjarlais.com/issues
Heading as listed on scottdesjarlais.com/issues ↗ (opens scottdesjarlais.com/issues at this heading)
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 14 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Agriculture
House Committee on Armed Services
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of DesJarlais’ 18 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00464073
76¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($508.2K of $667.2K). Cash on hand went from $396.3K on Mar 31, 2025 to $525K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $63,100 | $32,824 | $396,295 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $62,655 | $46,332 | $412,618 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $94,064 | $46,509 | $460,173 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $93,774 | $38,909 | $515,038 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $67,325 | $152,449 | $429,914 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $143,895 | $49,212 | $524,597 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 17, 2026 | $12,030 | $41,501 | $495,126 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $98,303 | $70,624 | $522,805 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $32,035 | $29,806 | $525,034 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Endorsements we could not read
Advanced · 39,491 votes (66%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 164 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $383K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 138 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $211.8K.
Total reported receipts $667,181
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
31% of the money placed by state came from inside Tennessee: $65.5K of $211.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 36 contributions · 32% | $67,500 |
| 49 contributions · 31% | $65,510 |
| 17 contributions · 13% | $27,500 |
| 8 contributions · 5.2% | $11,000 |
| 3 contributions · 4.2% | $9,000 |
| 3 contributions · 3.5% | $7,500 |
| 8 contributions · 3.1% | $6,500 |
| 3 contributions · 2.8% | $6,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 13 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 15 contributions · 11% of ranked | $23,825 |
| Written instead of an employer · 12 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $14,150 |
| Written instead of an employer · 5 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $13,500 |
| 2 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $6,600 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,890) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $428,806
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 307 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
8 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,758 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 20% of all spending | $100,000 |
| 23 payments · 11% of all spending | $56,259 |
| 26 payments · 8.8% of all spending | $44,738 |
| 17 payments · 5% of all spending | $25,500 |
| 2 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $23,640 |
| 9 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $23,481 |
| 2 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $17,820 |
| 7 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $17,286 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 13 contributions · 11% of ranked | $23,250 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 14 contributions · 11% of ranked | $22,325 |
| 6 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $14,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 5 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $13,500 |
| 8 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $13,500 |
| 5 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 7 contributions · 5% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $7,600 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,890) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.