Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CO-03 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CO-03
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
7 priorities from jeffhurdforcolorado.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Our open border is a national security crisis and a massive political failure.
The United States is at a crisis point. Communities across the country are being overwhelmed by illegal immigration, crime, and drugs such as fentanyl.
Our country has always been a nation of immigrants. Jeff strongly supports legal immigration and expanding opportunities for legal immigrants. But a country that can’t control its border isn’t meeting its fundamental responsibilities toward its citizens—including national security, economic security, and upholding the rule of law.
We must secure the border immediately. Border Patrol and law enforcement must be given all resources necessary to enforce the law. The federal government must also do everything in its power to work with local law enforcement to crack down on drugs and crime flowing into our country.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jeffhurdforcolorado.com/issues
Better jobs and a better economy mean healthier families and stronger communities.
If elected, Jeff’s top priority will be creating opportunities so rural Colorado economies can thrive. This includes higher-paying jobs that allow working families to support themselves.
Government plays an important role in economic development. But government is best when focused on creating conditions that allow businesses themselves to thrive. Jeff will target unnecessary mandates and regulations. Jeff will also work hard to incentivize investments from any sized company, but his primary focus will be on helping small businesses start, grow, and succeed.
When it comes to writing laws, big businesses don’t need help. If rural Colorado doesn’t have a member of Congress who cares about and understands policy, then laws and regulations get written by big business, and for big business. Jeff will fight to make sure laws and regulations treat small businesses in rural Colorado on a level playing field.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jeffhurdforcolorado.com/issues
It should be easier for working parents to raise their families.
It’s getting harder for working families to afford rural Colorado. The cost of food, transportation, and utilities keeps rising. Businesses struggle to recruit employees because of housing and childcare costs. Inflation in rural Colorado can be hard to measure[1], but those who live in rural areas experience it every day.
Jeff is open to balanced and thoughtful solutions that enable parents to work and raise their children. Pushing for jobs that let working families support themselves is key. But Jeff will also explore ways to find savings for families across rural Colorado. This includes the Child Tax Credit as well as tax credits and investments that assist parents struggling with child care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jeffhurdforcolorado.com/issues
Low cost, abundant energy is good for Colorado and good for national security.
Jeff supports the responsible development of all Colorado energy resources. This includes some of the cleanest oil and natural gas molecules in the world. It’s a win for Colorado when these resources are produced cleanly, safely, and efficiently.
Energy independence is most important. But it’s also a win for the United States when we export our energy resources: Colorado energy can substitute for higher-carbon fuels abroad, and exporting Colorado energy will protect our allies from energy blackmail from countries like Russia or China.
A believer in free markets, Jeff is open to competitively priced renewable energy and low-carbon resources. He will engage any company interested in bringing power plants, safe technologies, and well-paying jobs to southern and western Colorado.
Jeff knows permitting and regulatory reform are necessary to speed both traditional and low-carbon energy development. And with increasing demands for electricity, Colorado must do everything it can to support energy projects—particularly reliable generation that’s available on demand.
Responsible energy development means national security for America and economic security for Colorado families. It means lower gas and electric bills. It means tax and lease revenue to our communities. It means higher-paying blue-collar jobs, which in turn foster more stable families and stronger communities..
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jeffhurdforcolorado.com/issues
Protecting Colorado water requires thoughtful advocacy.
Politicians always talk about “fighting for” Colorado’s water. Yet, few are willing to work to understand how to shape the law, policy, and politics to protect Colorado’s upstream interests.
Rural Colorado has only one voice in the U.S. House of Representatives when it comes to water. Colorado needs a serious and credible leader to push water users in the lower Colorado River Basin to live within their water means. Jeff will be that voice. Separately, he’ll also push to eradicate water-guzzling and non-native plant species like the tamarisk. He’ll target specific changes to federal law permitting processes that allow development of critical Colorado water projects that benefit rural Colorado.
Most importantly, Jeff will always work closely with Colorado’s agriculture community. In making water policy decisions, Jeff will listen first—and last—to the water users who make a living from irrigating and the water providers who serve Coloradans in the 3rd Congressional District.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jeffhurdforcolorado.com/issues
Fighting for economic, social, and environmental contributions that can’t be replaced.
Jeff grew up in western Colorado and appreciates what farming and ranching mean to Colorado’s economy, its environment, and its culture. Agriculture produces the food we eat, contributes billions to our economy every year, is critical to conservation and land management, and preserves and protects our natural resources. When rural Colorado loses ranching and farmland—particularly that of legacy ranchers and farmers—it loses a core part of its identity.
The Farm Bill, along with policies relating to trade, labor, federal regulations, grazing, land use, water and wolves all impact agriculture. Jeff will work hard to protect the livelihood of farmers and ranchers throughout rural Colorado—no matter the size, and whether they’re first-generation or legacy producers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jeffhurdforcolorado.com/issues
Jeff believes that new innovations like blockchain technology and cryptocurrency have the potential to radically change our society for the better. We shouldn’t let countries like China leap ahead of American innovators. Legislation like the FIT21 bill (H.R. 4763) represents the kind of bipartisan lawmaking we need to see more of in Washington. In Congress, Jeff will fight to make sure that there are sensible regulations for advancing technologies like cryptocurrency, encouraging the innovation and job growth they bring, all while protecting the public from bad actors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jeffhurdforcolorado.com/issues
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 21 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Natural Resources
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Hurd’s 28 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00848333
95¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($3.9M of $4.2M). Cash on hand went from $553.7K on Mar 31, 2025 to $237.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $709,616 | $165,035 | $553,717 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $760,190 | $169,366 | $1,144,541 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $442,244 | $200,069 | $1,386,715 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $474,715 | $296,718 | $1,564,712 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $609,764 | $237,294 | $1,937,183 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jun 10, 2026 | $282,053 | $610,067 | $1,609,168 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $274,017 | $122,336 | $1,760,849 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $465,394 | $1,300,612 | $925,632 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $150,643 | $838,507 | $237,768 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
68 endorsers listed on Jeff Hurd’s own campaign site: 67 officials, 1 person.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Former U.S. Secretary of the Interior under President George W. Bush and former Colorado Attorney General
United States Ambassador (ret)
Former Undersecretary of Commerce and Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Under President Donald J. Trump
Former U.S. Senator for Colorado
Former Colorado Congressman, 3rd CD
Former Colorado Congressman, 3rd CD
Former Colorado Congressman, 4th CD
Former Chairman of Molson Coors Brewing Company and Miller Coors
Advanced · 62,536 votes (66%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,280 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.8M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 6 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 37 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $1.1M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 369 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $737.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $4,168,636
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
64% of the money placed by state came from inside Colorado: $1.2M of $1.8M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 870 contributions · 64% | $1,152,601 |
| 61 contributions · 5.2% | $94,093 |
| 32 contributions · 4.9% | $88,950 |
| 24 contributions · 3.7% | $66,627 |
| 40 contributions · 3.3% | $59,531 |
| 54 contributions · 2.7% | $49,560 |
| 14 contributions · 1.2% | $22,600 |
| 8 contributions · 1.2% | $22,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 38 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 358 contributions · 25% of ranked | $409,659 |
| Written instead of an employer · 136 contributions · 10% of ranked | $169,866 |
| 42 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $95,600 |
| Written instead of an employer · 30 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $90,700 |
| 25 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $69,900 |
| 27 contributions · 4% of ranked | $66,600 |
| 5 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
A further $34,296 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($91,241) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $30,612 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $2,611,017
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,792 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
60 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $254,278 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21 payments · 25% of all spending | $1,000,520 |
| 26 payments · 6.5% of all spending | $255,833 |
| 12 payments · 6.3% of all spending | $247,920 |
| 16 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $202,080 |
| 12 payments · 4% of all spending | $157,199 |
| 31 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $134,986 |
| 11 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $112,934 |
| 3 payments · 2% of all spending | $77,800 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 354 contributions · 23% of ranked | $407,759 |
| 79 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $107,989 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 35 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $101,200 |
| 25 contributions · 4% of ranked | $69,900 |
| 22 contributions · 3% of ranked | $53,000 |
| 24 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $50,431 |
| 40 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $49,991 |
| 27 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $39,000 |
A further $66,396 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($91,241) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.