Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CO-03 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, CO-03
Has not served in Congress
11 priorities from romeroforcolorado.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Affordability is at the top of my priority list. Think about all the people in our district and what matters most to them — its cost of living: housing costs, access to health care, and prices at the pump and the grocery store for that matter. Washington has been making it harder for Coloradans to make ends meet. I’m going to fight to make it easier, starting with repealing these disastrous tariffs and expanding the Family Tax Credits.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
Our farmers and ranchers are the bedrock of many of our communities and are a core part of our heritage. Many work the land that their parents and grandparents tended before them for generations. Right now, Washington is making their lives harder — not easier. That has to stop. I’ll fight for our family farms, ranches, and small agriculture businesses to strengthen rural economies for the next generation. We must pass a robust Farm Bill and keep foreign entities out of Colorado water and farmland ownership.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
Water is the key to life here in Colorado. As an elected member of my local water and sanitation district board, I see firsthand what’s at stake — from the challenges facing the Colorado River Compact, to attempts to take more water out of our home basins, and what this historic drought is doing to our water supply. We need someone in Congress who will hold the line for our district’s water resources. This is job number one.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
I’m a realist when it comes to energy. Turning an aircraft carrier takes energy and time. My approach is practical: we need to focus on using our legacy energy resources that are produced right here in CO-03 as we simultaneously press hard on the advancement and deployment of alternative energies. This transition window isn’t just pragmatic, it’s the only way we meet our ever increasing energy demand. An all-of-the-above approach is the only way we provide the reliable and affordable energy our communities need and deserve.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
I look at our public lands and I see something worth fighting for. Right now, our national forests across CD3 have seen massive reductions in field staff. That’s not a policy disagreement; that’s a crisis for our lands, our communities, and our economies that depend on these multiuse lands being protected. We need to oppose efforts to sell or transfer out public lands to private interests and support our firefighters and increase fire resilience.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
We need to make sure the people who live in and love our district — from young people to families — can stay here. Right now, they are being priced out. Whether you’re a rancher’s kid hoping to take over the business or a working family trying to put down roots, you deserve a real shot. We need to build more housing and bring down the cost of staying here. Let’s stop Wall Street behemoths from buying up homes and driving up rents, repeal outdated red tape that hinders construction, and invest in housing construction in our rural communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
The One Big Ugly Bill completely turned our health care network on its head — Medicare, Medicaid, & SNAP were decimated and people were kicked off their health plans. Rural hospitals are lifelines for both health care and jobs. When they close, communities lose. That’s a crisis. I will put healthcare at the top of my priority list. We’ve got to keep rural hospitals open and funded, allow medicare to negotiate lower drug prices, and protect women’s access to reproductive healthcare.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
Washington has failed on immigration for decades. I believe we can secure our border, uphold our values, and fix a broken system — all at the same time. That’s not a partisan position; it’s a practical one. And practical solutions are what this district deserves. Part of immigration reform needs to include a path to citizenship for long-term, law-abiding community members, and provide for more immigration judges to detain the bad guys and protect those seeking safe haven.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
I served. I took an oath at 18 years old — 43 years ago — swearing to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I earned a Bronze Star in the Gulf War. Two of my daughters have served or are serving as military officers. I know what veterans gave, and I know they deserve real, dependable support when they come home — not bureaucratic delays and budget cuts.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
Congress exists to represent the people, not to rubber-stamp whoever’s in the Oval Office. I’ll have the backbone to fight for what’s right, even at my own peril. This includes banning all federal officials from trading stocks, ending dark money in political spending, enacting term limits, and closing the revolving door between Congress and cushy lobbyist gigs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
Too many people in Western and Southern Colorado feel like DC doesn’t know they exist — let alone hear them. That has to change. As your Congressman, I’ll be accessible, responsive, and relentless about cutting through government bureaucracy to help everyday people get results. Whether it’s a veteran waiting on benefits, a family navigating a federal agency, or a small business owner fighting for answers — I’ll do the unglamorous but essential work of constituent service that too many politicians skip. No photo ops. No excuses. Just a fighter who answers the call, rolls up his sleeves, and gets to work for Colorado.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · romeroforcolorado.com/issues
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00941526
88¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($1.5M of $1.7M). Cash on hand went from $470.2K on Mar 31, 2026 to $196.1K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $505,781 | $35,555 | $470,227 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jun 10, 2026 | $183,340 | $282,069 | $371,497 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $27,455 | $314,743 | $84,208 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $823,259 | $645,072 | $262,395 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $161,257 | $227,528 | $196,124 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
10 endorsers listed on Dwayne L. Romero’s own campaign site: 4 officials, 1 union, 1 organization, 4 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Not yet called · 97% reporting · Full results ↗
Lost · 116,510 votes (47%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 308 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $319.8K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 26 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $73.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,701,091
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
67% of the money placed by state came from inside Colorado: $213K of $319.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 239 contributions · 67% | $212,983 |
| 10 contributions · 7.8% | $24,825 |
| 11 contributions · 6.7% | $21,299 |
| 12 contributions · 6% | $19,283 |
| 7 contributions · 4.1% | $13,058 |
| 4 contributions · 2.6% | $8,287 |
| 1 contribution · 1.1% | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.1% | $3,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 20 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 95 contributions · 29% of ranked | $91,841 |
| Written instead of an employer · 43 contributions · 13% of ranked | $40,698 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $2,450 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($199,602) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $3,669 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $853,943
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 204 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
8 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $29,094 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 payments · 20% of all spending | $296,208 |
| 4 payments · 11% of all spending | $160,287 |
| 5 payments · 6.9% of all spending | $103,465 |
| 16 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $43,900 |
| 1 payment · 2.3% of all spending | $35,000 |
| 4 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $28,999 |
| 3 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $21,513 |
| 3 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $20,048 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 64 contributions · 21% of ranked | $67,366 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 31 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $24,922 |
| 8 contributions · 6% of ranked | $19,283 |
| 16 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $17,000 |
| 5 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $15,427 |
| 11 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $13,896 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $8,000 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($199,602) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.