Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › OR-05 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, OR-05
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
8 priorities from janellebynum.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Too many Oregonians are being priced out of their communities or are unable to afford a home. That’s why, in Congress, Janelle has worked with both parties on efforts to lower the cost of housing, including introducing legislation to tackle housing shortages, workforce gaps, and affordability barriers while expanding pathways to homeownership and addressing youth homelessness. She’ll continue fighting to make homeownership a reality for all Oregonians.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janellebynum.com/issues/lowering-the-cost-of-housing
Heading as listed on janellebynum.com/issues ↗ (opens janellebynum.com/issues at this heading)
Our country doesn’t thrive unless our local economies thrive, and that means creating good jobs close to home, supporting small businesses, and bringing down the cost of living. In the State House, Janelle championed these issues, leading the passage of the Oregon CHIPS Act, the most pro-business, pro-worker, pro-Oregon collaboration in history. She brought that same focus to Congress to ensure that we’re improving Oregon’s business environment, supporting local businesses and rural economies, and bringing down costs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janellebynum.com/issues/strengthening-the-economy
Heading as listed on janellebynum.com/issues ↗ (opens janellebynum.com/issues at this heading)
Education is our greatest equalizer – Janelle knows this firsthand as the daughter of public school teachers and mom of four children. She believes that every child deserves access to a high-quality education that meets their needs. In Congress, she introduced legislation to invest in our students from kindergarten through college or trade school by equipping schools with resources, supporting educators, and expanding access to mental health and special education services.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janellebynum.com/issues/improving-education-access
Heading as listed on janellebynum.com/issues ↗ (opens janellebynum.com/issues at this heading)
President Trump and his Administration have raised costs, thrown our economy into chaos, and trampled on our democracy and ideals. Janelle has been outspoken against this Administration’s state sponsored terror, their attempted takeover of Oregon, and their ill-advised economic policies that sent costs skyrocketing. She’ll always stand up and fight for Oregonians.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janellebynum.com/issues/fighting-back-against-cruelty
Heading as listed on janellebynum.com/issues ↗ (opens janellebynum.com/issues at this heading)
The effects of climate change are felt close to home with brutal summers and the threat of wildfires year-round. Janelle knows it’s critical to tackle the climate crisis right away – for our environment, for our health, and for our economy. She is supporting efforts to generate more clean energy – which creates good jobs – transition away from fossil fuels, and protect our communities, property, and land from wildfires.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janellebynum.com/issues/taking-climate-action
Heading as listed on janellebynum.com/issues ↗ (opens janellebynum.com/issues at this heading)
No person should be a medical emergency away from bankruptcy, but sadly that happens all too often in our country. In the Oregon state legislature, Janelle worked to expand access to health care and mental health services so everyday Oregonians don’t have to choose between putting food on the table or a trip to the hospital. In Congress, she stood up against Republicans’ attempts to cut healthcare for millions of Oregonians. She also fought to protect Medicare, expand Medicaid, and lower the cost of prescription drug prices.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janellebynum.com/issues/lowering-cost-of-healthcare
Heading as listed on janellebynum.com/issues ↗ (opens janellebynum.com/issues at this heading)
As a mom, Janelle wants our daughters and sons to have the same rights she grew up with, but Republican extremists think politicians should be able to make health care decisions for women. They won’t stop until they pass a national abortion ban. In Congress, she is fighting to defend reproductive rights and codify Roe v. Wade at the federal level.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janellebynum.com/issues/protecting-reproductive-rights
Heading as listed on janellebynum.com/issues ↗ (opens janellebynum.com/issues at this heading)
Homelessness is one of the greatest social and economic challenges of our lifetime, and it’s critical we get people off our streets. As a state legislator, Janelle helped pass measures to prevent homelessness, increase shelter capacity, and expand mental health services. In Congress, she is continuing the work to end homelessness in our communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janellebynum.com/issues/ending-homelessness
Heading as listed on janellebynum.com/issues ↗ (opens janellebynum.com/issues at this heading)
96% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 25 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Financial Services
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Bynum’s 24 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00843425
55¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($2.6M of $4.7M). Cash on hand went from $328.4K on Mar 31, 2025 to $2.2M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $372,821 | $89,543 | $328,411 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $708,020 | $178,986 | $857,444 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $697,101 | $163,944 | $1,390,601 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $505,717 | $136,122 | $1,760,196 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $752,805 | $227,206 | $2,285,795 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $96,117 | $138,259 | $2,243,653 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $627,631 | $155,423 | $2,715,860 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $857,090 | $1,245,201 | $2,327,750 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $120,030 | $271,799 | $2,175,981 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Advanced · 56,868 votes (83%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4,509 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.7M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 760 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.3M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 10 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 26 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $442.5K.
Total reported receipts $4,737,332
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
34% of the money placed by state came from inside Oregon: $576K of $1.7M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,622 contributions · 34% | $575,952 |
| 546 contributions · 20% | $345,710 |
| 141 contributions · 8.5% | $144,119 |
| 132 contributions · 7.6% | $128,410 |
| 188 contributions · 5.7% | $95,603 |
| 227 contributions · 3.6% | $60,214 |
| 85 contributions · 1.8% | $31,092 |
| 47 contributions · 1.7% | $27,893 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 45 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,951 contributions · 56% of ranked | $852,279 |
| Written instead of an employer · 284 contributions · 9.2% of ranked | $141,481 |
| 6 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $12,000 |
| 5 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $11,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $11,000 |
| 6 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 6 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 12 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $7,928 |
A further $5,674 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($602,540) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $16,018 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,348,593
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,134 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
53 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $46,274 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 9.7% of all spending | $252,539 |
| 23 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $112,441 |
| 62 payments · 4% of all spending | $103,446 |
| 2 payments · 3% of all spending | $77,176 |
| 93 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $68,661 |
| 2 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $63,275 |
| 17 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $48,718 |
| 12 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $47,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,559 contributions · 43% of ranked | $706,947 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 398 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $154,189 |
| 198 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $111,011 |
| 37 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $53,220 |
| 23 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $34,416 |
| 33 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $24,166 |
| 45 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $23,335 |
| 66 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $22,985 |
A further $5,674 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($602,540) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.