Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › IL-12 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, IL-12
Representative since 2015
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
10 priorities from bostforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Protecting our agricultural economy is vital to the sustainability of Southern Illinois. That’s why Mike has fought to reduce regulatory burdens that strangle our farmers and ranchers.
He’s also worked to provide our producers with the tools they need to help mitigate against risk in a fiscally responsible way through the Farm Bill.
Additionally, Mike has sponsored critical legislation to help beginning farmers and ranchers access credit. He’s also voted to make major investments in rural broadband that would benefit under-served areas like Southern Illinois.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Southern Illinois has a proud heritage of coal mining and contains significant coal deposits. Recently, new technologies have developed to more efficiently produce energy from this coal with less pollution. Unfortunately, there remain those opposed to any use of fossil fuels.
Mike has consistently supported an all-of-the above energy policy that makes use of all our nation’s resources. As Southern Illinois families struggle with higher energy bills, Mike believes it’s common sense to use the resources that are proven and affordable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Mike has fought for policies that allow working families to keep more of their hard-earned money and promote economic growth.
Mike voted for Tax Reform legislation, which gives an average tax cut of over $2,200 to Southern Illinois families. He’s also voted to roll back job-killing regulations left over by the Obama Administration and and is a staunch opponent of the Biden-Pelosi socialist tax and spending plan.
Mike supports President Trump’s historic trade deals to protect our economy and American workers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Mike believes that Southern Illinoisans should have the right to make their own health care choices. That’s why he supports allowing businesses and associations to pull together their health plans to obtain larger health care premium discounts from major health insurers.
He wants to encourage more, not less competition, in the Medicare system by expanding, not shrinking, the popular Medicare Advantage program. We need to support measures that reduce costs, which will ultimately affect the price of premiums and the number of people who can afford insurance.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Money doesn’t grow on trees, but those in Washington often think it does. For too long, legislators went to Washington with a focus of “how much to spend” instead of “what to cut.” Because of that mindset, federal spending is out-of-control with growing deficits that place the burden on future generations.
Just as Americans must balance their own household budgets, Congress should be held to the same standards. Congress must make decisions that balance our federal budget in a reasonable, responsible way that leaves a country to our children and grandchildren better than the one we inherited.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Mike is unapologetically pro-life. He believes that life begins at conception and has been fighting for pro-life principles his entire adult life.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
As a U.S. Marine, Mike is committed to a strong national defense. With growing threats to U.S. interests around the world, he knows we must ensure our military is the best-trained and most advanced in the world so we meet the challenges of today and prepare for threats of tomorrow.
Mike is a strong supporter of a robust defense budget and a proud advocate for Scott Air Force Base – a vital economic engine to Southern Illinois.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Those counting on Social Security and Medicare should not have to worry about the promises that were made to them are kept. Mike opposes efforts to privatize, raise the retirement age or increase the payroll tax.
Congress must work together to prevent the financial collapse of these programs by promoting bipartisan efforts to address systemic problems and ensure its longevity for current and future generations.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
We have a constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms and it must be preserved and defended at all levels of government. Period.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Mike supports building a wall along our southern border and supports enforcing President Trump’s Remain in Mexico Policy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bostforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bostforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens bostforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 15 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Agriculture
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Bost’s 88 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00546499
70¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.1M of $1.6M). Cash on hand went from $350.1K on Mar 31, 2025 to $844.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $147,887 | $150,084 | $350,100 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $283,598 | $135,479 | $498,219 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $202,055 | $147,330 | $552,945 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $108,963 | $185,419 | $476,489 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 25, 2026 | $63,624 | $59,294 | $480,819 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $301,417 | $75,801 | $706,435 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $219,681 | $136,116 | $789,999 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $271,620 | $215,836 | $845,783 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $18,508 | $19,483 | $844,809 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
202 endorsers listed on Mike Bost’s own campaign site: 42 officials, 160 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
54th District · Senator , 54th District
55th District · Senator , 55th District
58th District · Senator , 58th District
59th District · Senator , 59th District
109th District · Representative , 109th District
114th District · Representative , 114th District
115th District · Representative , 115th District
116th District · Representative , 116th District
Alexander County Republican Central Committee Chair
Mayor of East Cape Girardeau
Alexander County EMA Director
Clark County Sheriff
Mayor of Marshall
Marshal City Councilman
Clark County Republican Central Committee Chair
Clay County Republican Central Committee Chair
No count published yet · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 545 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $994.9K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 627 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $464K.
Total reported receipts $1,617,353
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
65% of the money placed by state came from inside Illinois: $301K of $464K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 405 contributions · 65% | $300,976 |
| 24 contributions · 7.4% | $34,252 |
| 24 contributions · 4.8% | $22,250 |
| 13 contributions · 3.7% | $17,354 |
| 7 contributions · 3.7% | $17,000 |
| 19 contributions · 3.1% | $14,380 |
| 6 contributions · 2.9% | $13,500 |
| 28 contributions · 2.6% | $12,109 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 27 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 31 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $21,900 |
| 9 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $20,500 |
| 6 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $13,500 |
| 3 contributions · 3% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 6 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 11 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $8,705 |
| 3 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 3 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $7,500 |
A further $108,604 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($46,089) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $36,136 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $888,194
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,278 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
25 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $200,711 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 payments · 18% of all spending | $203,840 |
| 7 payments · 11% of all spending | $123,356 |
| 39 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $57,465 |
| 4 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $57,000 |
| 45 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $50,711 |
| 7 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $39,685 |
| 3 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $29,400 |
| 16 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $25,986 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 227 contributions · 13% of ranked | $52,487 |
| 31 contributions · 9% of ranked | $37,400 |
| 22 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $22,800 |
| 31 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $21,300 |
| 13 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $19,500 |
| 13 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $15,550 |
| 13 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $13,205 |
| 15 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $11,725 |
A further $48,617 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($46,089) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.