Loading the public record
Loading the public record
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
All recent votes114th CongressHouse
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Recognizes: (1) law enforcement agencies and officers for protecting us and making our communities safer; and (2) the potential for the use of body-worn cameras by on-duty law enforcement officers to improve community relations, increase transparency, and protect citizens and police.
Encourages law enforcement agencies to consider the use of body-worn cameras.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, describing H.Res. 295 as passed House without amendment on Jun 10, 2015. It is not the text of the measure; a later amendment may have changed what it does.
House Jun 10, 2015
Suporting local law enforcement agencies in their continued work to serve our communities, and supporting their use of body worn cameras to promote transparency to protect both citizens and officers alike.
Passed · Two-thirds required
421 Yea 6 Nay 5 not voting · 1 present
Crossed both parties 6 of 427 voting members broke with their own party: 6 Republicans.
DemocratsRepublicansFilled: YeaRing: NayGrey: not voting or present
433 members on this roll call, from the official House record. Party majorities need at least five voting members, so an independent never counts as breaking with a party.
Signing on is not a vote: a member can cosponsor H.Res. 295 and vote against it. 6 signed when it was filed.
Organizations that named H.Res. 295 in a lobbying disclosure. Only those that cited the bill by number appear, so this is a floor, not a full list.
8 disclosures name this measure. Retrieved from LDA.gov on 2026-10-05. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.