Loading the public record
Loading the public record
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
All recent votes113th CongressHouse
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on April 9, 2013. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Preventing Greater Uncertainty in Labor-Management Relations Act - Requires the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to cease all activity that requires a quorum of Board members. Prohibits the Board from appointing any personnel nor implementing, administering, or enforcing any decision, rule, vote, or other action decided, undertaken, adopted, issued, or finalized on or after January 4, 2012, that requires a quorum of the Board members.
Terminates the requirements of this Act upon: (1) confirmation of all Board members constituting a quorum with the advice and consent of the Senate, (2) a decision by the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of Board appointments made in January 2012, or (3) the adjournment sine die of the first session of the 113th Congress.
Prohibits, in the event of this Act's termination, the appointment, or implementation, administration, or enforcement of any Board action occurring on or after January 4, 2012, that requires authorization by not less than a quorum of the Board members, unless and until the action is considered and acted upon by a Board constituting a quorum, or the Supreme Court issues a decision on the constitutionality of the Board appointments made in January 2012.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, describing H.R. 1120 as passed House amended on Apr 12, 2013. It is not the text of the measure; a later amendment may have changed what it does.
Apr 12, 2013Each bar: ✓ Yea from the bottom, ✕ Nay aboveApr 12, 2013
House Apr 12, 2013 · the primary vote
Preventing Greater Uncertainty in Labor-Management Relations Act
Passed
219 Yea 209 Nay 4 not voting
Party-line vote 10 of 428 voting members broke with their own party: 10 Republicans.
DemocratsRepublicansFilled: YeaRing: NayGrey: not voting or present
432 members on this roll call, from the official House record. Party majorities need at least five voting members, so an independent never counts as breaking with a party.
Signing on is not a vote: a member can cosponsor H.R. 1120 and vote against it. 12 signed when it was filed.
Organizations that named H.R. 1120 in a lobbying disclosure. Only those that cited the bill by number appear, so this is a floor, not a full list.
331 disclosures name this measure. Retrieved from LDA.gov on 2026-10-05. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.