Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00108613 · files monthly
5 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Bringing back balance, Common sense, and true indiana values.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · indems.org
Our vision for Indiana is a state led by Hoosier Democrats, where residents live in vibrant communities they are proud to call home.
Where they earn the Midwest’s highest wages, send their children to top-ranked schools, and live healthy fulfilling lives.
We believe that when Democrats are in office, good things happen for Hoosiers, so we fight every day to elect Democrats up and down the ballot in Indiana.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · indems.org/our-party
Heading as listed on indems.org ↗ (opens indems.org at this heading)
Indiana Democrats have delivered for public schools, Indiana’s ag community, and for Hoosier families – regardless of the Zip code.
This is a look at how Democrats continue to create a better future for all of Indiana.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · indems.org/where-we-stand
Indiana is a state made up of small towns across all 92 counties, and its public schools and farmers are the heartbeat of these rural communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · indems.org/democrats-deliver
Heading as listed on indems.org/where-we-stand ↗ (opens indems.org/where-we-stand at this heading) · “Publications” on indems.org/where-we-stand ↗ (opens indems.org/where-we-stand at this heading)
Democrats have delivered $250 million of guaranteed funding for broadband internet expansion opportunities across Indiana through the American Rescue Plan.
By adding another $100 million from President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better agenda, Democrats will deliver the kind of internet investment that’ll help our farmers and families be set up for long-term success.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · indems.org/democrats-deliver
Because of Indiana Democrats’ American Rescue Plan, the state’s public schools, educators, and our children now have a brighter future.
For the first time in over a decade, Indiana’s public schools received the full and total funding that’s needed to help our children succeed.
After years of hearing lip service from Indiana Republicans, Democrats delivered a pay raise to educators for their work in the classrooms.
All of this is thanks to the American Rescue Plan.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · indems.org/democrats-deliver
Indiana farmers and the state’s broader ag community is a pillar of the state’s economic and cultural identity to many Hoosiers who call this place home.
Indiana Democrats celebrate farmers and have worked tirelessly to deliver a better future for their way of life and families.
Thanks to the American Rescue Plan, more than $100 million is being used to help streamline food supply chains farmers rely on to help feed and provide for communities across Indiana and the nation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · indems.org/democrats-deliver
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $2.9K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $2.9K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana | 1 | $2.9K |
Bars drawn to $2.9K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · 2 payments | $1.3M |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 27 payments | $343.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments |
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,220 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $274K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $4,824,793
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,168 contributions · 96% | $264,108 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% | $2,200 |
| 3 contributions · 0.7% | $2,000 |
| 18 contributions · 0.6% | $1,650 |
| 2 contributions · 0.5% | $1,250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.4% | $1,000 |
| 8 contributions · 0.3% | $800 |
Total reported disbursements $4,575,204
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$4.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.5M, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2008 cycleReport released Mar 4, 2011
1980 cycleReport released Mar 29, 1982
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $166.5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 3 payments | $150K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to HOOSIER NEIGHBORS VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $45.5K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $24.9K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $20K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $17.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to THE EMPOWERMENT FUND · 2 payments | $5.3K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$2.2M from 17 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to SC PARTY VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $950K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC/STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $550K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $200K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $60K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to NV PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $50K |
| 2 payments | $49.9K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 7 payments | $28.1K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $24.9K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $12K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to THE EMPOWERMENT FUND · 10 payments | $2.9K |
| 7 payments | $2.7K |
$1.9M across 11 recipient committees, or 42% of everything this committee reports spending. A further $1.7K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $104.1K from 83 sources in all.
| $630 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 511 contributions · 27% of ranked | $72,244 |
| 4 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $16,500 |
| 10 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $15,350 |
| 1 contribution · 5.6% of ranked | $15,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 87 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $14,300 |
| 6 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $11,500 |
| 3 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $4,400 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($155,631) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 493 contributions · 20% of ranked | $54,765 |
| 16 contributions · 11% of ranked | $29,150 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 24 contributions · 8.8% of ranked | $23,729 |
| 10 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $20,210 |
| 47 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $19,430 |
| 6 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $10,100 |
| 3 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 48 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $8,880 |
A further $4,100 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($155,631) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,076,465
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 343 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
22 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $19,166 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 21% of all spending | $950,000 |
| 2 payments · 12% of all spending | $550,000 |
| 1 payment · 4.4% of all spending | $200,000 |
| 21 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $60,909 |
| 1 payment · 1.3% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.1% of all spending | $50,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $49,853 |
| 7 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $28,125 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.