Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Chicago, IllinoisActive
Connected organization: Dnc/state Party Victory Fund
The Democratic Party of Illinois is the affiliate of the Democratic Party in the U.S. state of Illinois. It is the oldest extant state party in Illinois and one of just two recognized parties in the state, along with the Republican Party. It is currently the dominant party in the state, controlling the majority of Illinois's U.S. House seats, both U.S. Senate seats, both houses of the state legislature, and the governorship. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00167015 · files monthly
3 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The Democratic Party of Illinois is dedicated to electing Democrats at all levels across Illinois while building the most active, inclusive, and diverse party possible.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ildems.com
Democrats are working for every family across Illinois—in Springfield, Washington, and beyond.
We’re focused on creating good jobs, building vibrant communities, expanding access to affordable healthcare, protecting our environment, safeguarding democracy, and ensuring quality education for all.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ildems.com
Heading as listed on ildems.com ↗ (opens ildems.com at this heading)
Heading as listed on ildems.com ↗ (opens ildems.com at this heading)
In Springfield, Washington, and all across our state, we are dedicated to growing good-paying jobs, investing in our communities, delivering high-quality education for all, protecting our environment, safeguarding democracy, expanding access to affordable healthcare, enhancing public safety, defending reproductive choice, and more.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ildems.com/our-party/our-fight
As the party of inclusion, we are committed to serving every community in Illinois and fighting against injustice and inequity wherever it persists.
The Democratic Party of Illinois stands as the voice of Democratic values, providing support and infrastructure to nominees and local organizations, while bridging efforts with the national party.
We are dedicated to transparency, high ethical standards, and empowering Democrats to create meaningful change together.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ildems.com/our-party/our-fight
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $2K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $2K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Illinois | 1 | $2K |
Bars drawn to $2K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $550K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 20 payments | $409.8K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to RUIZ VICTORY FUND · 1 payment |
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $750.3K from 201 sources in all.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 645 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $394.9K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $9,150,981
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 606 contributions · 95% | $376,390 |
| 7 contributions · 1.6% | $6,400 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% | $5,000 |
| 5 contributions · 0.4% | $1,700 |
| 4 contributions · 0.4% | $1,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% | $750 |
Total reported disbursements $8,519,016
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$8.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2010 cycleReport released Nov 5, 2014
2010 cycleReport released Nov 5, 2014
1998 cycleReport released May 29, 2001
1994 cycleReport released Feb 19, 1998
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Democratic Party of Illinois is the affiliate of the Democratic Party in the U.S. state of Illinois. It is the oldest extant state party in Illinois and one of just two recognized parties in the state, along with the Republican Party. It is currently the dominant party in the state, controlling the majority of Illinois's U.S. House seats, both U.S. Senate seats, both houses of the state legislature, and the governorship. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Democratic Party of Illinois is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $250K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 36 payments | $238.2K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $191K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORPORATION / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $150K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments | $118.7K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to SC PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $100K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SEEC VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $73K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $40K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 9 payments | $29.4K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS · 1 payment | $25K |
$2.4M from 62 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 26 payments | $218.9K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 9 payments | $49.3K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $9.5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $8.8K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2K |
| 1 payment | $1.4K |
| 1 payment | $363 |
$297.8K across 10 recipient committees, or 3.5% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 9 are shown. A further $500 was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 1 contribution · 0.2% |
| $600 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 272 contributions · 22% of ranked | $84,488 |
| Written instead of an employer · 45 contributions · 8.5% of ranked | $32,075 |
| 2 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $12,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $15,912 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($124,715) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 43 contributions · 23% of ranked | $86,658 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 232 contributions · 22% of ranked | $81,733 |
| 3 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $20,250 |
| 10 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $10,800 |
| 1 contribution · 2.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 7 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $9,750 |
| 16 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $9,250 |
A further $15,912 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($124,715) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $588,656
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 493 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
12 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $11,457 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 26 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $218,880 |
| 23 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $74,496 |
| 21 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $60,909 |
| 9 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $49,313 |
| 8 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $33,500 |
| 11 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $27,500 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 110 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $19,052 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.