Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00007658 · files monthly
“The South Carolina Democratic Party is committed to building a stronger, more equitable future for every South Carolinian. Guided by the values of opportunity, fairness, justice, and inclusion, we work to elect Democratic leaders who will strengthen our communities, protect fundamental rights, expand access to quality education and affordable healthcare, grow our economy, and defend the freedom to vote. Together with county parties, volunteers, elected officials, and grassroots supporters across all 46 counties, we are organizing, engaging voters, and building a Democratic movement that reflects the voices and needs of every community in South Carolina.”
Democratic Party of South Carolina, on its own site, scdp.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The purpose of the South Carolina Democratic Party is to support Democratic nominees and to win elections, but that has become increasingly difficult throughout the years.
Cycle after cycle, the Party’s inability to galvanize substantial support statewide and across legislative districts has ensured that we continue to lose ground in South Carolina.
But we cannot concede to the Republicans.
The Project Roadmap Task Force will recommend ways for the South Carolina Democratic Party to strategically implement its priorities around a Coordinated Campaign Model, Voter Engagement, Candidate Recruitment, Training, and Support for candidates at all levels, and recommend best practices for County Parties.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · scdp.org/project-roadmap
Heading as listed on scdp.org/project-roadmap ↗ (opens scdp.org/project-roadmap at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 3 payments | $950K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 30 payments | $294.4K |
| Senate campaign committee · 6 payments | $270K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments | $173.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $122.8K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $100K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $100K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORPORATION / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 1 payment |
$2.2M from 26 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC/STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $100K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $100K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $98K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $36.7K |
| 1 payment | $18.9K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $18K |
$371.7K across 6 recipient committees, or 8.7% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $305.4K from 105 sources in all.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,026 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $426.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $5,549,636
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,786 contributions · 81% | $347,417 |
| 82 contributions · 6.9% | $29,380 |
| 5 contributions · 1.7% | $7,250 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% | $5,750 |
Total reported disbursements $4,280,723
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$4.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $785.7K, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2010 cycleReport released Mar 18, 2014
2010 cycleReport released Mar 18, 2014
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Democratic Party of South Carolina is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names SC Party Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Democratic Party of South Carolina is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $50K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORPORATION · 1 payment | $40K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DOLLARS FOR DEMOCRATS · 1 payment | $30K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $20K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $19.6K |
| $4,008 |
| 13 contributions · 0.8% | $3,480 |
| 4 contributions · 0.7% | $3,004 |
| 13 contributions · 0.7% | $2,948 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 164 contributions · 17% of ranked | $40,971 |
| Written instead of an employer · 104 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $15,301 |
| 20 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $11,100 |
| 1 contribution · 4.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 14 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $6,760 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $6,000 |
A further $172,152 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($528,630) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 938 contributions · 39% of ranked | $163,856 |
| 91 contributions · 11% of ranked | $46,351 |
| 108 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $22,966 |
| 43 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $18,430 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 104 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $15,301 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $10,250 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 10 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $5,610 |
A further $7,166 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($528,630) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $442,072
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 30 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 2.3% of all spending | $100,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.3% of all spending | $100,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $98,000 |
| 21 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $60,909 |
| 2 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $36,745 |
| 1 payment · 0.4% of all spending | $18,925 |
| 1 payment · 0.4% of all spending | $18,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $9,493 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.