Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › South Carolina U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate, South Carolina
Has not served in Congress
10 priorities from drannieandrews.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
I’ve sat beside parents who don’t know how they’ll pay for their child’s medication. I’ve seen hospitals close their doors and leave entire communities without care. Healthcare should be something every family can count on, not something you have to fight for.
Washington has worked to slash Medicaid, roll back ACA subsidies, and gut funding for the Department of Health and Human Services. They’ve stood by while public health experts were pushed out of government and misinformation spread faster than a virus. Families are paying the price for that neglect.
In the Senate, I’ll work to:
- Advocate for policies like a public option that expand access to affordable healthcare for all South Carolinians
- Make mental health care easier to find and afford
- Protect and expand Medicaid and Medicare
- Lower the cost of prescription drugs
- Defend and restore scientific research that leads to new cures
- Strengthen vaccine access and public-health preparedness
- Keep rural hospitals open
Everyone deserves the peace of mind that if they or their child get sick, they can see a doctor without going broke.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/healthcare-is-a-right-not-a-privilege
I do the grocery shopping for my family. I’ve watched prices climb on everything from milk to eggs to bananas, while politicians in Washington do nothing. Families are doing everything right and still falling behind, while billionaires and corporations get special treatment. That’s not ok with me.
I’ll fight to:
- End tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and corporate polluters
- Raise wages and strengthen workers’ rights
- Expand affordable child care and paid family leave
- Bring back trade policies that protect South Carolina’s jobs and farms
An economy that works for families should not be controversial. It’s just common sense.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/an-economy-that-works-for-working-people
If we want our kids to thrive, we have to give them a foundation that’s strong and safe. From early childhood through high school, families in South Carolina are doing their part, but Washington keeps short-changing our classrooms.
Washington Republicans are all for budgets that squeeze public schools while handing tax breaks to the wealthy. That means fewer teachers, bigger class sizes, and fewer opportunities for our kids, especially in rural and working-class communities.
I’ll fight to give every child a real shot by working to:
- Invest in modern classrooms, technology, and school safety
- Fully fund public schools and special education
- Expand access to affordable child care and early learning
- Raise pay for teachers and school staff
- Protect and expand free and reduced-price school meals
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/strong-schools-affordable-child-care
As a doctor and a mom, I’ve cared for women in some of the most difficult moments of their lives. I’ve seen what happens when politicians interfere with deeply personal medical decisions, and it’s devastating.
Republicans cheered on South Carolina politicians who are now pushing one of the most extreme bans in the country—one that would endanger women’s lives and criminalize doctors.
These decisions belong to women and families, not to politicians. I’ll fight to:
- Restore the protections of Roe v. Wade
- Guarantee access to contraception and infertility care
- Expand maternal health services, especially in rural communities
No woman should have to leave her state or risk her life to get medical care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/reproductive-freedom-trust-women
Public service is supposed to mean something. But Washington is full of people who forgot who they work for.
I don’t take a dime of corporate PAC money. I’m not a career politician. I’m a doctor who believes the government should serve families, not donors.
I’ll make government work for families again by:
- Banning corporate PAC and dark money
- Barring members of congress from trading stocks and getting rich off of insider information
- Supporting term limits and stronger ethics rules
- Protecting the right to vote and making elections fairer
- Standing up to anyone, in any party, who puts power over people
No one should get rich off public service. It’s supposed to be about doing what’s right.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/fighting-political-corruption
I’ve cared for children who survived shootings and met parents who didn’t get to take their child home from the hospital. Those are stories you don’t forget.
We can respect the Second Amendment and still protect our kids. That means:
- Universal background checks
- Banning weapons of war from our streets
- Safe storage laws that prevent unintentional shootings and youth suicides
- More funding for community violence prevention and mental health programs
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/an-end-to-gun-violence
We can have secure borders and still treat people with dignity. It’s not complicated; it’s just the right thing to do.
I’ll support immigration reform that:
- Strengthens border security
- Creates a fair path to citizenship for people who work hard and follow the rules
- Keeps families together and ensures due process
- Supports South Carolina’s farms, businesses, and workforce
Law and compassion can coexist. That’s what true leadership looks like.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/immigration-security-with-dignity
Technology is part of every kid’s life now, but it shouldn’t come at the cost of their safety or privacy. Big Tech shouldn’t be allowed to profit off our children.
While Washington talks tough on tech, they have done nothing to rein in the corporate power that’s exploiting kids online. I’ll actually do something about it.
I’ll fight to:
- Rein in tech companies that misuse personal data
- Establish a national digital bill of rights
- Protect kids from social media addiction and online exploitation, including getting phones out of schools
- Regulate AI and facial recognition tools that can discriminate or be abused
Technology should help families, not harm them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/protecting-kids-not-big-tech
I’ll fight to:
- End reckless, open-ended wars
- Require Congress to approve use of military force
- Put diplomacy and accountability first
- Fully support veterans and military families
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/no-more-endless-wars
Safe roads, reliable bridges, and modern infrastructure are not luxuries. Thanks to investments passed under President Biden and Secretary Pete Buttigieg, South Carolina has received billions to repair highways, replace aging bridges, expand transit, and modernize our infrastructure.
I’ll fight to make sure federal dollars actually reach our communities by working to:
- Fix and modernize South Carolina’s roads, bridges, and highways
- Expand public transit and safe sidewalks so people can get around safely
- Invest in clean energy and resilient infrastructure
- Create good-paying jobs building the future right here at home
When Washington shows up, South Carolina should feel it in every mile driven and every job created.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drannieandrews.com/issue/transportation-infrastructure-that-works
FEC filings, May 22, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00906024
93¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 8 reports ($22.5M of $24.2M). Cash on hand went from $671.9K on Jun 30, 2025 to $1.7M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,249,437 | $577,561 | $671,876 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,584,665 | $1,057,821 | $1,198,719 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $1,471,988 | $1,089,770 | $1,580,938 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $2,213,206 | $1,154,857 | $2,639,287 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 20, 2026 | $1,540,409 | $1,314,388 | $2,865,309 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $2,744,335 | $1,490,350 | $4,119,295 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $9,369,656 | $11,181,319 | $2,307,632 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $4,043,144 | $4,641,311 | $1,709,466 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
2 endorsers listed on Annie Andrews’ own campaign site: 1 official, 1 organization.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
“As a pediatrician who has spent nearly two decades in children’s hospitals, Annie Andrews knows firsthand how Washington’s failures have hurt South Carolina families. In Washington, Annie will be focused on the future, expanding affordable health care options, investing in public schools and our students, and ensuring that we have an economy where one job is enough. I am proud to endorse Annie for Senate, because South Carolina deserves a Senator who will deliver for the state, not corrupt politicians in D.C.”Former U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg”
“President Mackler: “While Lindsey Graham has spent two decades serving himself and his donors, Dr. Annie Andrews has spent nearly 20 years fighting for South Carolina’s children and families.” “While Lindsey Graham has spent two decades serving himself and his donors, Dr. Annie Andrews has spent nearly 20 years fighting for South Carolina’s children and families. As a pediatrician, she has seen firsthand how decisions made in Washington hurt families across the state — and she’s running for the U.S. Senate to fight for them. EMILYs List is proud to support her campaign and work alongside her to defeat Senator Graham.”
Advanced · 225,924 votes (62%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Lost · 898,710 votes (45%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Darline Graham leads Annie Andrews by 1.5 pointsAverage of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls
Latest poll · The New York Times/Siena University, Oct 26, 2026
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 31,626 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $4.2M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 4 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $18.9K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 70 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $253.3K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $24,216,841
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
40% of the money placed by state came from inside South Carolina: $1.7M of $4.2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10,747 contributions · 40% | $1,687,407 |
| 3,475 contributions · 11% | $445,364 |
| 1,192 contributions · 6.1% | $256,819 |
| 1,050 contributions · 4.9% | $208,022 |
| 1,118 contributions · 3% | $126,164 |
| 1,169 contributions · 2.9% | $121,961 |
| 818 contributions · 2.5% | $104,915 |
| 745 contributions · 2.3% | $97,797 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 55 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 22,735 contributions · 66% of ranked | $2,308,098 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2,023 contributions · 11% of ranked | $391,321 |
| 158 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $63,118 |
| 35 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $19,258 |
| 12 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $14,500 |
| 23 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $13,627 |
| 35 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $11,994 |
| 10 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $11,100 |
A further $21,382 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($12,500,480) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $157,777 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $11,216,917
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,268 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
49 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $300,821 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 96 payments · 23% of all spending | $5,078,353 |
| 5 payments · 13% of all spending | $3,017,059 |
| 78 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $550,630 |
| 82 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $423,560 |
| 4 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $350,000 |
| 44 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $290,056 |
| 25 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $179,119 |
| 17 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $142,513 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 21,587 contributions · 53% of ranked | $2,115,085 |
| 1,546 contributions · 10% of ranked | $407,196 |
| 745 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $200,785 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,127 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $187,359 |
| 162 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $45,878 |
| 166 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $42,793 |
| 35 contributions · 1% of ranked | $40,025 |
| 77 contributions · 1% of ranked | $38,329 |
A further $21,382 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($12,500,480) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.