Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Oklahoma City, OklahomaActive
Connected organization: Democratic Grassroots Victory Fund
The Oklahoma Democratic Party (ODP) is an Oklahoma political party affiliated with the Democratic Party. It and the Oklahoma Republican Party, are the state's two major parties. The party dominated local politics in Oklahoma almost since the days of early statehood in 1907 to 1994. In national politics, the party became a dominant force beginning with the presidential election of 1932 and the Franklin D. Roosevelt political re-alignment. From 1932 to 1994, the majority of members of Congress from Oklahoma have been Democrats, and of the 28 men and women who have been elected to the office of Governor of Oklahoma, 22 have been Democrats. However, the party has fared poorly since 1994; Democrats lost five out of six congressional races that year. Since then, they have won only a handful of seats, which they no longer hold. In response, the traditionally disorganized Oklahoma Democrats moved to create a more organized state party, hiring a professional executive director in 1995. Even so, ODP continued to decline in the 2000s, losing control of both the Oklahoma House of Representatives and Senate. In the 2008 Presidential Election, Oklahoma gave one of the lowest percentage of any state's vote to Barack Obama, second only to Wyoming. Since 2004, Republicans have won every county in Presidential Elections in Oklahoma. As of January 21, 2025, there are 658,136 registered Democratic voters in Oklahoma. This marks an increase in absolute terms from 652,611 in 2024, but a relative decrease from 28.4% to 26.6% of registered voters. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00190934 · files monthly
“Engage, connect, and organize Oklahomans to elect Democrats at every level of government.”
Oklahoma Democratic Party, on its own site, okdemocrats.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
7 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Paychecks That Keep Up
Strong Public Schools
Protect Healthcare Options
Fight Government Corruption
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · okdemocrats.org/agenda
Heading as listed on okdemocrats.org/agenda ↗ (opens okdemocrats.org/agenda at this heading)
After 18 years of Republican control, rent and housing costs are skyrocketing, grocery prices are up, and healthcare is increasingly out of reach.
Oklahoma Democrats believe working families deserve leadership that will take on corporate price gouging, build more homes, lower home insurance rates, and support a raise to Oklahoma's antiquated minimum wage.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · okdemocrats.org/agenda
Heading as listed on okdemocrats.org/agenda ↗ (opens okdemocrats.org/agenda at this heading)
After a Republican-led race to 50th in education, Oklahomans are ready for a change in direction.
We oppose private school vouchers for the already wealthy and instead invest in what works: strong teachers, student literacy, smaller class sizes, and safe, supportive learning environments for every Oklahoma kid.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · okdemocrats.org/agenda
Heading as listed on okdemocrats.org/agenda ↗ (opens okdemocrats.org/agenda at this heading)
Oklahoma Democrats oppose cuts to state and federal healthcare funding.
We’re fighting to protect Medicaid expansion, expand access to rural hospitals and clinics, and invest responsibly in a system that guarantees every Oklahoman has access to affordable, quality care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · okdemocrats.org/agenda
Heading as listed on okdemocrats.org/agenda ↗ (opens okdemocrats.org/agenda at this heading)
Oklahomans deserve leaders who act with integrity, transparency, and accountability, and Oklahomans aren't seeing it from the Republican-controlled State Government.
After a constant stream of legislation attacking Oklahomans' ability to participate in their government - from making it harder to run for office, put state questions on the ballot, and even vote - its time for new leaders.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · okdemocrats.org/agenda
Heading as listed on okdemocrats.org/agenda ↗ (opens okdemocrats.org/agenda at this heading)
We, the Democrats of the State of Oklahoma, united under the banner of the oldest political party in the world, hereby rededicate ourselves to the principles which have historically sustained our party.
While recognizing the limits of government, we regard democratic government as a force for good and a source of hope.
We seek individual freedom in the framework of a just society.
Both our country and our state are in peril.
Democrats support secure, efficient, and accessible voting.
We support expanding access to absentee or mail-in ballots and oppose any effort to eliminate “no excuse” absentee voting.
We oppose efforts to abolish the JNC or alter it in ways that would further politicize our state judiciary.
The future of our state depends on innovation.
We must continue to diversify our state’s economy.
We support allowing workers with Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) to obtain driver’s licenses to more safely contribute to our state’s economy and care for their families.
Oklahoma exists on the lands of 39 sovereign Tribal Nations.
We recognize and support tribal sovereignty.
We believe Oklahoma should be inclusive for all of us, regardless of race, sex, gender identity, age, ethnicity, religion, sexuality, or ability.
Oklahoma Democrats value knowledge, scholarship, and verifiable historical truth.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · okdemocrats.org/agenda
Heading as listed on okdemocrats.org/agenda ↗ (opens okdemocrats.org/agenda at this heading)
As Democrats we believe change happens when we work together, across differences, to create a shared vision for a better future and then actively work towards making that vision a reality.
Our theory of change is grounded in the belief that systemic change requires addressing root causes and engaging in intersectional work that tackles issues of equity and justice across a variety of domains.
We believe meaningful change comes from building relationships and engaging in community organizing and advocacy efforts that center the voices of those most impacted by the issues we seek to address.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · okdemocrats.org/about
Heading as listed on okdemocrats.org/about ↗ (opens okdemocrats.org/about at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $3K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $3K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | 1 | $3K |
Bars drawn to $3K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 25 payments | $277.2K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments | $171.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,175 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $537.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $1,778,135
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,123 contributions · 96% | $518,315 |
| 15 contributions · 1.1% | $5,701 |
| 1 contribution · 0.7% | $3,500 |
| 4 contributions · 0.6% | $3,434 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% | $1,300 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% | $1,240 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% |
Total reported disbursements $1,783,067
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $162.9K, June 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2016 cycleReport released Jul 23, 2019
2012 cycleReport released Apr 5, 2016
2006 cycleReport released Aug 14, 2007
Late 12G report, 2018$7.1K assessed
Case 3557 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Oklahoma Democratic Party (ODP) is an Oklahoma political party affiliated with the Democratic Party. It and the Oklahoma Republican Party, are the state's two major parties. The party dominated local politics in Oklahoma almost since the days of early statehood in 1907 to 1994. In national politics, the party became a dominant force beginning with the presidential election of 1932 and the Franklin D. Roosevelt political re-alignment. From 1932 to 1994, the majority of members of Congress from Oklahoma have been Democrats, and of the 28 men and women who have been elected to the office of Governor of Oklahoma, 22 have been Democrats. However, the party has fared poorly since 1994; Democrats lost five out of six congressional races that year. Since then, they have won only a handful of seats, which they no longer hold. In response, the traditionally disorganized Oklahoma Democrats moved to create a more organized state party, hiring a professional executive director in 1995. Even so, ODP continued to decline in the 2000s, losing control of both the Oklahoma House of Representatives and Senate. In the 2008 Presidential Election, Oklahoma gave one of the lowest percentage of any state's vote to Barack Obama, second only to Wyoming. Since 2004, Republicans have won every county in Presidential Elections in Oklahoma. As of January 21, 2025, there are 658,136 registered Democratic voters in Oklahoma. This marks an increase in absolute terms from 652,611 in 2024, but a relative decrease from 28.4% to 26.6% of registered voters. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Oklahoma Democratic Party is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $40K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $32.4K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to SC PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $18K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $12K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$556.1K from 7 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 3 payments | $56K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 11 payments | $41K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 3 payments | $40.9K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $3K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $2K |
$142.9K across 5 recipient committees, or 8% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $100.8K from 101 sources in all.
| $1,019 |
| 7 contributions · 0.1% | $612 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 506 contributions · 23% of ranked | $101,334 |
| Written instead of an employer · 212 contributions · 21% of ranked | $91,854 |
| 4 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $23,025 |
| 8 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $14,250 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 15 contributions · 2% of ranked | $8,878 |
| 20 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $8,200 |
| 5 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $5,969 |
A further $84,855 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($207,148) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 178 contributions · 20% of ranked | $107,608 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 503 contributions · 19% of ranked | $100,977 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 651 contributions · 15% of ranked | $80,799 |
| 30 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $27,450 |
| 4 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $23,025 |
| 36 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $16,954 |
| 4 contributions · 3% of ranked | $16,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $10,207 |
A further $1,706 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($207,148) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $208,987
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 44 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $60,909 |
| 3 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $56,000 |
| 11 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $41,000 |
| 3 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $40,900 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $3,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.1% of all spending | $2,516 |
| 1 payment · 0.1% of all spending | $2,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,240 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.