Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (nonqualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Leadership PAC affiliated with Pete Buttigieg (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00697441 · files monthly
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Win the Era is a community dedicated to fostering a new politics that brings people together in support of bold, equitable, and sustainable solutions.
We believe this defining decade presents the opportunity to make the next chapter in American life more like what it should be—more inclusive, prosperous, and decent.
Guided by our values, the Rules of the Road, we advocate for the ideas, policies and people required to win the era that must come next.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · wintheera.com/about/mission
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $770 · 0.3% |
| Democratic party committees | 50 | $250K · 98% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $5K · 2% |
| All recipients | 52 | $255.8K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Nevada | 1 | $770 |
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $50 |
$50 from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC/STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE/FEDERAL STATE PARTY ACCT · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DOLLARS FOR DEMOCRATS · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to AL PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to TN PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to TALARICO VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DOLLARS FOR DEMOCRATS · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC WV STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
$255.8K across 55 recipient committees, or 2.3% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $10.4K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 31,175 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.9M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $213.8K from 3 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $16,486,758
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5,985 contributions · 19% | $557,112 |
| 1,781 contributions · 6.8% |
Total reported disbursements $11,175,181
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$11.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.6M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Leadership PAC affiliated with Pete Buttigieg Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Win the ERA PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $196,584 |
| 1,945 contributions · 5.6% | $164,362 |
| 1,101 contributions · 4.8% | $140,550 |
| 1,301 contributions · 4.7% | $137,489 |
| 1,129 contributions · 4.1% | $118,890 |
| 1,101 contributions · 4% | $116,145 |
| 1,214 contributions · 4% | $115,784 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,322 contributions · 41% of ranked | $250,675 |
| Written instead of an employer · 70 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $20,346 |
| 4 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $15,050 |
| 35 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $7,900 |
| 5 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,100 |
| 11 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 7 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,700 |
| 28 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,500 |
A further $1,946,388 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($12,378,244) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 22,334 contributions · 70% of ranked | $1,929,240 |
| 498 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $73,103 |
| 464 contributions · 2% of ranked | $56,226 |
| 128 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $37,462 |
| 254 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $32,816 |
| 384 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $32,488 |
| 184 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $29,242 |
| 210 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $23,982 |
A further $11,373 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($12,378,244) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $11,036,642
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,049 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
159 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,412,507 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 40 payments · 24% of all spending | $2,672,080 |
| 124 payments · 12% of all spending | $1,376,867 |
| 11 payments · 9.6% of all spending | $1,070,285 |
| 17 payments · 9% of all spending | $1,001,786 |
| 108 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $589,690 |
| 14 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $540,252 |
| 12 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $411,986 |
| 19 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $391,942 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.