Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › IN-09 race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. House, IN-09Indiana
Has not served in Congress
13 priorities from timpeckforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
My Plan for Better Healthcare ↗ (opens timpeckforcongress.com/healthcare-plan at this heading)
I have a clear and specific plan to address the healthcare challenges that weigh most heavily on our community.
Healthcare is 20% of our federal budget and should not be a partisan issue; it affects us all, regardless of political affiliation. As a physician, healthtech entrepreneur, and advocate for patient-centered care, I have not only witnessed the flaws in our healthcare system but have actively worked to change it.
Like too many Americans, my own family has felt the immensely heavy impact of dementia, a condition that is fast becoming an epidemic as our baby boomers age. Navigating the complex healthcare system has become a burden, not just my loved ones but for countless families in our district. The American healthcare system should provide support and care and respect—it should be a system that we love, that we want—but somehow it always seems to do the opposite and add to the stress and confusion of being sick.
I've been in the trenches, advocating before Congress, testifying as an expert, and actively participating in coalitions pushing for better patient experiences that also saves the government and taxpayers money. We've made strides, but there's much more to be done.
We need to address the shortage of healthcare workers, especially in areas like behavioral health, where we have only one nurse practitioner serving this entire region in rural Clark County. We must protect the physician-patient relationship by removing government from our medical choices including women's reproductive health. With the fentanyl crisis and a growing mental health epidemic, we must increase access to behavioral health services. My plan involves incentivizing the healthcare workforce, utilizing innovations like telemedicine to reduce unnecessary hospitalizations, and reaching vulnerable populations in nursing homes and homecare.
Rural health is a critical part of our system that deserves investment. This includes improving broadband access, which is essential for the implementation of telemedicine and ensuring that no community is left behind.
We also need to reform how we pay for healthcare to decrease fraud, waste, and abuse. When 20 cents of every dollar the government spends goes to this single line item, even the slightest savings in our health budget could free up resources for crucial domestic needs like education and financing for small businesses and farming. This is a crucial part of my platform. A dollar misspent on healthcare doesn’t only affect healthcare—it’s a dollar that didn’t go to infrastructure, defense, or caring for our children. We must work for and demand a better quality and more efficient healthcare system because it will make a better more efficient government system too.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · timpeckforcongress.com/healthcare-plan
Hoosier seniors deserve to retire with dignity. People are owed the benefits they were promised and paid for, and Congress must act now to ensure those promises are kept.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · timpeckforcongress.com/issues-2
It is incredibly expensive to be unhealthy in this country, and it is both fiscally irresponsible and inhumane to deprive people of healthcare in America.
Congress must act to preserve a sustainable Medicare system. It is simply inhumane to leave the most vulnerable among us without access to healthcare and other necessary services.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · timpeckforcongress.com/issues-2
A secure border makes a stronger and safer America. While we should certainly deport criminals and bad actors, we must do so only after they have received the due process granted to them under law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · timpeckforcongress.com/issues-2
Abortion is healthcare. Women have the right to choose what they do with their bodies, including when, if, and how to start a family. The government does not belong in the exam room with the doctor and the patient.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · timpeckforcongress.com/issues-2
Finances shouldn’t stop someone from daring to dream. Safe and affordable housing must be available to all Hoosier families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · timpeckforcongress.com/issues-2
Climate change is an emergency. We must act now so that our children and grandchildren have clean air to breathe and safe water to drink.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · timpeckforcongress.com/issues-2
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Apr 15, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00857714
100¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($171.1K of $171.6K). Cash on hand went from $21.1K on Mar 31, 2025 to $16.8K on Apr 15, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $17,515 | $12,277 | $21,112 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $12,905 | $16,500 | $17,517 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $29,548 | $31,979 | $15,086 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $42,786 | $53,981 | $3,891 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $65,725 | $48,183 | $21,433 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 15, 2026 | $3,090 | $8,221 | $16,812 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsers named
No count published yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 251 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $137.8K.
Total reported receipts $171,570
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Apr 15, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
61% of the money placed by state came from inside Indiana: $83.5K of $137.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 183 contributions · 61% | $83,537 |
| 22 contributions · 18% | $24,350 |
| 7 contributions · 6.4% | $8,750 |
| 7 contributions · 3.7% | $5,100 |
| 8 contributions · 3.5% | $4,850 |
| 4 contributions · 2% | $2,750 |
| 3 contributions · 1.6% | $2,250 |
| 4 contributions · 0.9% | $1,200 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 17 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 121 contributions · 45% of ranked | $58,395 |
| Written instead of an employer · 17 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $7,580 |
| 3 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.8% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 8 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $4,850 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $2,812 |
A further $7,250 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($24,526) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $500 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $154,205
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Apr 15, 2026.
All 292 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
24 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $89,700 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 118 payments · 71% of all spending | $121,140 |
| 16 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $8,075 |
| 2 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $7,500 |
| 2 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $2,983 |
| 45 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $2,778 |
| 4 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $1,624 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $1,255 |
| 8 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $1,104 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 97 contributions · 37% of ranked | $49,574 |
| 13 contributions · 10% of ranked | $14,050 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 28 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $9,205 |
| 3 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 10 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $6,900 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $3,000 |
A further $3,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($24,526) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.