FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00876615 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$10K raised, $10.6K spent, $8.9K cash on hand (through Sep 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
50% from PACs and other committees · 31% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Lifepoint Health PAC - the PAC of Lifepoint Corporate Services, General Partnership & Facilities Which Are Subsidiaries of Lifepoint Health, $5K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$7K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Ata Action Pac ($2.5K) · 50% of its support to candidates of other or unresolved parties, 50% to Democrats. See where it goes
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$7K to 5 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $7,000
Other or unresolved 50%Democratic 50%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Other or unresolved
2
$3,500
$0
$3,500
50%
Democratic
3
$3,500
$0
$3,500
50%
Shown support
5
$7,000
$0
$7,000
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$7,000 in 5 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $9,950 reported receipts
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$5,00050%
Besides giving through its PAC, ATA Action pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$146.9K
Quarterly reports read
14
Bills it named
12
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Health Issuesin 13 report entries · 12 bills named
In its own words
ATA Action - Federal Legislative Priorities (119th Congress) As of Q4 2025, ATA Action continues to support and lobby for a broad portfolio of bipartisan legislation aimed at making telehealth and digital health a permanent, integrated part of care delivery in the U.S. healthcare system.
Below is a summary of the legislation we are actively engaging on: 🔹 Top Legislative Priorities Telehealth Expansion Act (H.R. 1650 / S. 763) Sponsors: Rep. Arrington (R-TX), Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV), Sen. Daines (R-MT), Sen. Cortez Masto (D-NV) → Makes permanent the ability to offer pre-deductible telehealth services under high-deductible health plans linked to HSAs.
ATA Action PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
3
$3.5K · 50%
Other or unresolved candidates
2
$3.5K · 50%
All recipients
5
$7K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
Bars drawn to $2.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Brian Schatz1 receipt, latest Sep 23, 2025Schatz for Senate · S4HI00136$2.5K
Doris Matsui1 receipt, latest Apr 17, 2026Matsui for Congress · H6CA05195$1.5K
Terri A. Sewell1 receipt, latest Mar 28, 2025Terri Sewell for Congress · H0AL07086$1K
David S. Schweikert1 receipt, latest Mar 5, 2025Friends of David Schweikert · H4AZ06045$1K
Jennifer McClellan1 receipt, latest Nov 4, 2025Mcclellan for Congress · H4VA04066$1K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
One contribution on May 5, 2025 · CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER · TRINITY HEALTH · LAS VEGAS, NV
$300
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 4 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$1,50015%
Where it came from
ATA Action PAC1 receipt, latest Sep 30, 2026 · WASHINGTON, District of Columbia$1,500
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$4004%
Total reported receipts $9,950
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $3,050 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $60
$60+
$240+
$540+
$960+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Florida1 contribution · 49%
$1,500
Massachusetts2 contributions · 41%
$1,250
Nevada1 contribution · 9.8%
$300
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Foley & Lardner1 contribution · 49% of ranked
$1,500
Harvard Medical School1 contribution · 25% of ranked
$750
CVS Health1 contribution · 16% of ranked
$500
Trinity Health1 contribution · 9.8% of ranked
$300
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($400) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Attorney1 contribution · 49% of ranked
$1,500
Executive In Residence1 contribution · 25% of ranked
$750
CMD1 contribution · 16% of ranked
$500
Chief Information Officer1 contribution · 9.8% of ranked
$300
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($400) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
ATA Action1 payment · latest Apr 30, 2025 · REIMBURSEMENT FOR PAC START UP COSTS$1,000
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$1,0249.7%
Total reported disbursements $10,597
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $8,518 itemized
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$7,00082%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$7,000
Paid to
ATA Action PAC$3,500
Matsui for Congress$1,500
Friends of David Schweikert$1,000
Sewell for Congress$1,000
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$1,00012%
Filed as
REIMBURSEMENT FOR PAC START UP COSTS$1,000
Paid to
ATA Action$1,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$5186.1%
Filed as
BANK/MERCHANT FEES$518
Paid to
Eagle Bank$518
Total itemized disbursements $8,518
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 7 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Spending over time
$10.6K spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $4.5K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
$10.6K
Jan 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$637
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$1,500
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$55
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$3,887
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$4,518
Permanent Telehealth from Home Act (H.R. 1407) Sponsors: Rep. Buchanan (R-FL), Rep. Max Miller (R-OH), Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) → Eliminates originating site and geographic restrictions for Medicare telehealth services permanently.
Audio-Only Telehealth Services Act (H.R. 1899) Sponsors: Rep. Feenstra (R-IA), Rep. Pappas (D-NH) → Makes permanent coverage of audio-only services in Medicare.
Expanded Provider Access Act (H.R. 1614) Sponsors: Rep. Kelly (R-PA), Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) → Permits therapists, audiologists, and speech-language pathologists to deliver telehealth services permanently.
TREATS Act (H.R. 1627) Sponsors: Rep. Norcross (D-NJ), Rep. Fitzpatrick (R-PA) → Permanently waives the in-person requirement for prescribing controlled substances (Schedules III-IV) via telehealth for substance use and opioid use disorders. 🔹 Additional Supported Legislation PREVENT DIABETES Act (H.R. 1523) Sponsors: Rep. DeGette (D-CO), Rep. Bilirakis (R-FL) → Expands Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program to include virtual suppliers.
Sustainable Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation in the Home Act (H.R. 783 / S. 248) Sponsors: Rep. Joyce (R-PA), Rep. Peters (D-CA), Sen. Blackburn (R-TN), Sen. Klobuchar (D-MN) → Makes permanent the option to provide cardiopulmonary rehab services at home via telehealth.
Hospice Recertification Flexibility Act (H.R. 1720) Sponsors: Rep. Carol Miller (R-WV), Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME) → Allows hospice recertification visits via telehealth beyond 180 days.
Rural Telehealth and Education Enhancement Act (H.R. 290) Sponsors: Rep. Langworthy (R-NY), Rep. Pingree (D-ME) → Reauthorizes USDAs Distance Learning and Telemedicine grant program through FY2030.
ATA Action is actively advocating for these bills through direct engagement with congressional offices, testimony, coalition coordination, and public policy campaigns.
This legislative portfolio reflects our commitment to securing permanent access to telehealth and integrating next-generation digital tools across care settings nationwide.
Telehealth Expansion Act (H.R. 1650 / S. 763) Permanent Telehealth from Home Act (H.R. 1407) Audio-Only Telehealth Services Act (H.R. 1899) Expanded Provider Access Act (H.R. 1614) TREATS Act (H.R. 1627) PREVENT DIABETES Act (H.R. 1523) Sustainable Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation in the Home Act (H.R. 783 / S. 248) Hospice Recertification Flexibility Act (H.R. 1720) Rural Telehealth and Education Enhancement Act (H.R. 290) Monitor Prescription Digital Therapeutics policy.
H.R.6994 - To amend the Controlled Substances Act to modify requirements relating to the prescription of controlled substances by means of the Internet, and for other purposes.
Education regarding DEA's final telemedicine rule.
Education about asynchronous telemedicine and letters of medical necessity in the FSA/HSA space.
Issues related to telehealth and virtual care. Medicare telehealth flexibilities, direct to patient care models, remote prescribing of controlled substances.
telehealth flexibilities, remote prescribing, digital health, virtual foodcare
CONNECT for Health Act Reintroduction ATA Action strongly supports the Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act, the most comprehensive bipartisan telehealth legislation in Congress.
The bill would permanently remove geographic and originating site restrictions, expand eligible providers, and allow patients to access care from their homes.
It represents a critical step toward ensuring telehealth remains a foundational element of modern healthcare.
Telehealth Modernization Act Reintroduction ATA Action endorses the Telehealth Modernization Act, which codifies the key Medicare telehealth flexibilities first introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The bill eliminates outdated site restrictions and empowers patients to receive care where and when they need it.
This legislation is essential to maintaining progress and providing certainty to patients, providers, and health systems.
CONNECT for Health Act Reintroduction Telehealth Modernization Act Reintroduction Promote medicare Telehealth extension in government funding legislation.
Assisting with federal engagement to support access to telehealth
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS)
Natl Economic Council (NEC)
Office of Natl Drug Control Policy (NDCP)
White House Office
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
Who did the lobbying
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $1.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Congresswomen Doris Matsui$1.5K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “ATA ACTION”, found by searching “ATA ACTION”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
House campaign committee · 1 payment
$1K
Mcclellan for CongressHouse campaign committee · Connected to MCCLELLAN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment
$1K
$7K across 5 recipient committees, or 66% of everything this committee reports spending.