Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00178038 · files monthly
“The New Hampshire Democratic Party is fighting for policies that support strong, healthy, and resilient communities and families, and a strong economy with opportunities for all.”
New Hampshire Democratic Party, on its own site, nhdp.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
4 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
New Hampshire’s greatest strength comes from the opportunities we create for everyone.
We work hard, help each other out, and build diverse communities where everyone can belong and thrive.
But today our state faces serious challenges ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
rising costs, barriers to opportunity, and restoring trust that our government will answer to the people it serves.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading) · “Our Platform” on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
A strong economy is built from the ground up.
New Hampshire thrives when everyone can afford to live here and businesses have the tools to grow and compete.
Economic strength does not come from alienating New Hampshire from our neighboring communities.
It does not come from passing costs from the state to local property taxpayers.
It does not come from starving public budgets.
Those policies raise property taxes and weaken our communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
New Hampshire’s child care shortage is pushing people out of the workforce. Access to safe, affordable child care is essential for working families and a strong economy. When families can find reliable care for their children, parents can participate fully in the workforce, businesses can grow, and children enter school ready to learn.
Affordable child care should be within reach for every family. We support policies that reduce the financial burden on working parents and expand access to high-quality care across the state.
Early learning helps children succeed. Investments in early educational programs make sure that our children enter school prepared to thrive.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
A strong New Hampshire depends on good jobs with wages that keep pace with the cost
of housing, child care, health care, and education.
Our entire state prospers when workers
bargain collectively, earn competitive wages, work in safe conditions, have access to
appropriate job training, and enjoy real opportunities to advance.
The right to organize and bargain collectively must be protected.
Wages should reflect the real cost of living. Overtime protections and pay equity
Every worker deserves to retire with dignity and security.
Access to training, apprenticeships, and higher education prepares Granite
Staters for skilled trades and emerging industries.
Immigrants strengthen our workforce and economy, contributing across
industries that support communities throughout the state.
Fiscal responsibility means balanced budgets, honest accounting, and sustainable revenue
The state and local communities work best as partners not
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
Free and fair elections are the foundation of public trust and accountable government.
Every voter must be able to participate safely and have confidence in the election outcome.
Democracy works best when our elected officials reflect the full diversity of our communities, and we will actively recruit, train, and support candidates from underrepresented communities, including people of color, LGBTQ+ people, people with disabilities, immigrants, young people, and other historically marginalized groups, so that all Granite Staters see themselves represented in public office.
Redistricting must be fair and equitable, free from partisan gerrymandering.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
Individual and collective safety is essential to Granite Staters’ happiness and wellbeing across our communities.
All residents deserve equitable treatment and response, regardless of who or where they are.
The safety of children, individuals, and families is a fundamental function of government and the responsibility of everyone. This includes protecting people from domestic and sexual violence.
We support a high quality public safety workforce–law enforcement, firefighters, and EMS personnel–through safe working conditions, proper training and staffing, and good retirement benefits.
We support the due process rights of all individuals, regardless of citizenship.
We support local communities having the final say in all efforts to site federal detainment and incarceration facilities.
We believe in responsible gun ownership. This includes universal background checks and the right of communities to restrict guns in certain public places.
Cannabis should be legalized, regulated, and equitably enforced.
We support full, fair, and timely access to our courts and the state’s provision of adequate legal counsel for people who cannot afford it.
We oppose the reinstatement of the death penalty consistent with part 1, article 18 of the New Hampshire Constitution which states, “the true design of all punishments being to reform, not to exterminate mankind.”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
New Hampshire derives strength from the contributions of its diverse populations.
Our communities grow and thrive when everyone is valued and participates fully in civic, economic, and community life.
We oppose bigotry, racism, religious intolerance, religious indoctrination, ableism, xenophobia, scapegoating, and any other conduct that harms communities, polarizes our residents, and forces individuals to live life in the shadows.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
We affirm the dignity, equality, and full civil rights of all LGBTQ+ people in every aspect of life.
People who identify as LGBTQ+ deserve the same rights and opportunities as everybody else in all aspects of life and society, including education, health care and insurance coverage, participation in sports, public facilities, and career opportunities.
We recognize and respect transgender people for who they are; transgender women are women, and transgender men are men.
We believe that health care decisions for LGBTQ+ people belong to patients, their families, and their medical professionals — not politicians.
We support the privacy, safety, and well-being of LGBTQ+ people of all ages, especially youth, who may face rejection and discrimination and are at an increased risk of suicide and self harm.
We support equal protection under the law for LGBTQ+ people, including the right to travel. We reject discrimination, harassment, and threats based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
We recognize that sex and gender are complex and diverse and exist on a spectrum. We respect the many natural variations that exist within the human experience.
We believe every young person deserves to feel safe, supported, and included in school and in their community. Building inclusive communities strengthens New Hampshire for everyone.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
We value people experiencing disability – visible or invisible.
Everyone must be afforded access to high-quality education, housing, and competitive, integrated employment in a safe and welcoming work environment.
We strive to guarantee access to community based services to those with disabilities in order that they may thrive in their communities.
We support accessible public transportation and rural mobility options, ensuring that people with disabilities can reliably access employment, health care, education, and civic life, no matter where they live in the state.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
Immigration is foundational to our state’s growth and essential to a thriving economy, vibrant culture, and an engaged society.
We welcome and value all individuals and families who settle lawfully in our state and choose to make New Hampshire their home.
All immigrants should be treated with dignity and respect.
We reject the inhumane warehousing and mass detention of immigrants in our state.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/our-platform ↗ (opens nhdp.org/our-platform at this heading)
For more than 200 years, Democrats have represented the interests of working families, fighting for equal opportunities and justice for all Americans.
Our party was founded on the conviction that wealth and privilege shouldn’t be an entitlement to rule and the belief that the values of hardworking families are the values that should guide us.
We didn’t become the most prosperous country in the world by rewarding greed and recklessness or by letting those with the most influence write their own rules.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nhdp.org/about-our-party
Heading as listed on nhdp.org/about-our-party ↗ (opens nhdp.org/about-our-party at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 28 payments | $950.5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 26 payments | $280.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $199K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments | $156.4K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $40K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $33.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $32K |
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $240K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 8 payments | $47.3K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $37.5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $26.9K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $23.2K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $2.9K |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 623 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $771.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 5 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
The 8 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $56.1K from 8 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $5,621,727
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 409 contributions · 50% | $384,053 |
| 78 contributions · 14% | $107,725 |
| 5 contributions · 14% | $105,250 |
| 12 contributions · 5% | $38,220 |
| 29 contributions · 4.8% | $37,355 |
Total reported disbursements $5,566,457
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $2,000 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$5.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $717.9K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
1994 cycleReport released Mar 27, 1997
1990 cycleReport released Feb 8, 1993
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
New Hampshire Democratic Party is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names DNC State Party Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
New Hampshire Democratic Party is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $25K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $20K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $10K |
$1.9M from 44 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment |
| $938 |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $226 |
$379K across 8 recipient committees, or 6.8% of everything this committee reports spending.
| 15 contributions · 3.9% | $30,264 |
| 18 contributions · 2% | $15,502 |
| 6 contributions · 1.9% | $15,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 339 contributions · 41% of ranked | $306,478 |
| Written instead of an employer · 10 contributions · 11% of ranked | $79,433 |
| Written instead of an employer · 48 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $39,050 |
| 2 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $35,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $35,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $17,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $18,050 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($260,060) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 318 contributions · 33% of ranked | $251,790 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 29 contributions · 16% of ranked | $119,871 |
| 5 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $37,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $35,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $35,000 |
| 22 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $22,150 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 2% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 6 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $11,073 |
A further $15,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($260,060) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $793,549
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 241 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $10,000 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $240,000 |
| 19 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $72,791 |
| 21 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $67,380 |
| 2 payments · 1% of all spending | $54,067 |
| 3 payments · 1% of all spending | $53,333 |
| 8 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $47,250 |
| 1 payment · 0.7% of all spending | $37,500 |
| 2 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $26,917 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.