Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00089243 · files monthly
3 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Massachusetts Democrats believe that every person has the right to live a full, meaningful life with equal access to opportunity, security, and inclusion.
When we empower people to organize their local communities, we can change our Commonwealth and our country for the better.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massdems.org
Heading as listed on massdems.org ↗ (opens massdems.org at this heading)
On September 13th, 2025, Massachusetts Democrats gathered at a time of the greatest Constitutional challenge in our lifetimes.
Many Americans have lost faith in our government and trust in our institutions.
Younger generations struggle to believe in a brighter future.
Far too many feel left behind, forgotten, and oppressed.
As a result, Americans have turned to a President whose impulse is not to heal divisions, but to exacerbate them.
Rather than inspire hope, he chooses to inflame resentments.
But this is no ordinary time.
Massachusetts values are Democratic values.
We believe that each of us has the right to be who we are, believe what we believe, love who we love, say what we think, and live free from fear and repression.
We stand by the contributions of African Americans, whose sacrifices and role in building this nation must never be forgotten.
We believe in addressing the affordability crisis facing so many of our families by bringing down costs and expanding economic opportunity for people wherever they live in the Commonwealth.
We support eliminating barriers to new investments in housing that is more affordable and accessible to all.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massdems.org/our-platform
Heading as listed on massdems.org/our-platform ↗ (opens massdems.org/our-platform at this heading)
We, the Democrats of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, in common purpose with the National Democratic Charter, are united in seeking for our State and our Nation, justice, equality, freedom, and a decent quality of life for all individuals in the Commonwealth.
We affirm that we can best attain these goals through being a strong, cohesive, and honest Party that is accessible to all.
The Massachusetts Democratic Party recognizes and supports the rights of all individuals, regardless of race, creed, color, national or ethnic origin, age, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation, ability, economic status, or philosophical persuasion to participate in all Party activities (or affairs) at any level of the Party structure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massdems.org/issues/issue-1
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $1.7K · 63% |
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $1K · 37% |
| All recipients | 2 | $2.7K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $1.7K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 16 payments | $171.6K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments | $163.1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEAL VICTORY FUND · 5 payments | $133K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORPORATION / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 7 payments |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,207 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.7M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 5 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $6,088,472
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,041 contributions · 78% | $2,118,143 |
| 40 contributions · 5.4% | $146,165 |
| 29 contributions · 4.5% | $122,800 |
| 21 contributions · 2.2% | $60,913 |
| 15 contributions · 1.5% | $41,500 |
Total reported disbursements $6,192,691
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$6.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $856.2K, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2010 cycleReport released Nov 18, 2013
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Massachusetts Democratic State Committee - FED Fund is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names Democratic Grassroots Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Massachusetts Democratic State Committee - FED Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $124.6K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to MARKEY VICTORY FUND · 6 payments | $63.7K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $40K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $32.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $32.3K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $26.9K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $19K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FIGHT AND WIN FUND · 1 payment | $18.4K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CLARK TRAHAN PRESSLEY VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $11.5K |
$1.1M from 81 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $43.2K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 5 payments | $33.8K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 4 payments | $27.3K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $1K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $1K |
$113.8K across 7 recipient committees, or 1.8% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $75.5K from 17 sources in all.
| 16 contributions · 1.2% |
| $31,960 |
| 4 contributions · 1.1% | $30,500 |
| 4 contributions · 0.8% | $22,333 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 327 contributions · 23% of ranked | $560,613 |
| Written instead of an employer · 94 contributions · 8.5% of ranked | $208,018 |
| 9 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $90,000 |
| 20 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $51,000 |
| 7 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $34,000 |
| 19 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $30,165 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $28,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 21 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $26,583 |
A further $116,469 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($531,732) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 325 contributions · 21% of ranked | $549,909 |
| 54 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $190,595 |
| 69 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $140,530 |
| 17 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $107,049 |
| 50 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $70,480 |
| 13 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $69,750 |
| 21 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $68,980 |
| 19 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $66,240 |
A further $93,207 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($531,732) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,043,958
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 343 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
10 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $53,948 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $189,695 |
| 22 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $143,000 |
| 108 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $119,794 |
| 14 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $110,400 |
| 1 payment · 1% of all spending | $63,895 |
| 21 payments · 1% of all spending | $60,909 |
| 15 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $54,074 |
| 9 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $53,252 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.